Saturday, April 5, 2025

Season 41 Jeopardy Update: A Cluster of Champions Greets Us This Month

 

Having watched Jeopardy for more than thirty years (that concept frightens me as well) I have become aware of certain patterns that occasionally appear but that recent viewers might be less aware of. These include the phenomena that might be called a ‘cluster of champions’. More likely due to coincidence and luck then the rise of super-champions in the past decade they have history of appearing slightly more frequently.

A cluster is basically when a quick succession of qualifiers for the Tournament of Champions arise during a short period of time, usually one following the other or at the most the day after one has been defeated. They happened very rarely during the first twenty years of the show, mainly because it was very difficult for a succession of four or five game winners to occur. It did happen, of course but rarely more than once a season at most.

It happened more frequently after Ken Jennings appearance and then began to officially start become more often during the next few years. The first one of real significance came during the 2011-2012 season when Jason Keller, David Leach and Dan McShane all qualified for the Tournament of Champions in the course of a month. Jason won 9 games, Dave won 6 and Dan won four.

We saw a similar cluster the following season when Keith Whitener won seven games, was defeated by Paul Nelson who won 5 and then two days after he was beaten, Jason Shore won four. In the midst of this was the 2012 Teachers Tournament which was won by Colby Burnett, so you could argue four players qualified for the 2013 TOC in less than six weeks.

The arrival of the super-champions began in Season 30 and began to draw considerably more attention but the clusters were often as common. In the 2014-2015 season, Michael Bilow, Kerry Greene and Alex Jacob all qualified for the 2015 TOC pretty much consecutively and two days after Alex was defeated Greg Seroka would have a seven game streak and win $180,401. During the 2017-2018 season Gilbert Collins, Rachel Lindgren and Ryan Fenster would all win five games in during January of that year. Clusters were not as noticeable during Season 38 considering all of the super-champions but they did happen. Christine Whelchel, Margaret Shelton and Maureen O’Neill all won four games consecutively and Ryan Long’s sixteen game streak gave way to Eric Ahasic’s six game streak and Megan Wachspress’ six game streak

Defining clusters has been slightly more difficult with the rise of Second Chance Tournament, Champions Wild Card and allowing three game winners, which has its own issue. However in the last month of Season 41, it’s pretty clear we have just gone through another cluster of Jeopardy champions, none of whom are super champions but all of whom will likely be formidable in the 2026 Tournament of Champions.

The same week that Laura Faddah’s run came to an end Alex DeFrank managed the impressive one day total of $42,401 in his first victory. The next day he came from behind to win in Final Jeopardy and by Thursday had won $102,400 – more than Laura had won in eight games. But on that day he ran into Cameron Berry who absolutely ran away with it by the end of Double Jeopardy and won with $24,600.

Cameron’s run lasted one day as he then ran into Josh Weikert, a politics professor from College Pennsylvania. In what was a difficult battle Josh emerged the victor winning $23,601. He then went on to win every game the following week finishing it with 100,202.

Then on Monday he ran into Bryce Wargin and Allison Willard. This was a tight match from beginning to end. Josh was leading at the end of the Jeopardy round and at the end of Double Jeopardy even though Bryce and Allison found all the Daily Doubles and were never far behind him. At the end of Double Jeopardy all three had impressive totals: Josh led with $15,000, Bryce was next with $12,400 and Allison had a very impressive $11,400.

The Final Jeopardy category was COMMUNICATION. “Invented by a student in 1824, this system has a total of 64 combinations. Allison couldn’t come up with an answer. Bryce could: “What is Braille?” As Ken pointed out “Six dots, 2 to the 6th.) Bryce bet $3400 and moved into the lead.

It came down to Josh. He wrote down Semafore, crossed it out and wrote: “What is Morse Code?” (That was my guess as well.” It cost him $9801 and Bryce became the new champion with $15,400. (It’s almost certain Allison will be invited back in the next Second Chance Tournament, considering how she played she’s more than worthy.)

Bryce then won the next three games during the week, always in the lead at the end of Double Jeopardy. He had gotten three Final Jeopardys correct and the fourth incorrect but because no one else did, he kept the title. He’d already won $70,199.

Yesterday with a win automatically punching his ticket to the Tournament of Champions he faced Guy Branum and Mike Dawson. It was a close match in the Jeopardy round but at the end of it Bryce was in third with $3400 to Guy’s $6800 and Mike’s $5800.

Bryce found the first Daily Double on his first pick and naturally risked everything in LITERATURE. “A Simple Habana Melody by Oscar Hjuelos focuses on the rumba, but this other 5-letter dance is in the title of his best known work.” I knew it but he didn’t. He guessed: “What is the tango?” It was the mambo (The Mambo Kings Play Songs of Love) He dropped to zero and spent the rest of the round in third place, finishing with $5600 to Guy’s $10,800 and Mike’s $15,000.

Whatever chance he had depended on Final Jeopardy. The category was THE NOBEL PRIZES. “Only one man and one woman have won Nobel Prizes in 2 different categories, with this category in common.” Bryce’s response was the wrong one: “What is physics?” It cost him all but a dollar. It didn’t matter because both Guy and Mike knew the right category: chemistry. (Ken told us: Madame Curie won in Chemistry & physics; the other, Linus Pauling, chemistry and peace.”) Mike became the new winner with $21,601.

Bryce’s $70,199 and four wins will be sufficient to get him to the Tournament of Champions this year. It remains to be seen whether this cluster will continue to grow much in the same way the one that took up most of regular play in Season 40 did. As for possible qualifiers for the next Second Chance Tournament, there are a couple of obvious ones in this cluster (along with Allison who like I said is a sure thing) :

Brett Aresco: Led Alex at the end of Double Jeopardy in his second appearance but was defeated when he got Final Jeopardy wrong.

Geraldine Rodriguez: Only player to get Final Jeopardy correct but was too far behind to benefit from it in Josh’s second win.

Melanie Hirsch: Was ahead of Josh at the end of the Double Jeopardy round of his fourth appearance. All three players got Final Jeopardy wrong; Josh’s wager was small enough to leave him the last man standing.

Alfred Wallace: Made a remarkable recovery to nearly overtake Bryce in the Double Jeopardy round of his fourth win having got six of the first seven clues correct. He responded incorrectly on the second Daily Double and could never get close enough again.

There may be more from the rest of the seventeen games that were played but these are by the far more deserving ones in my opinion. (The last several months have done much for me to reevaluate by opinion on the Second Chance Tournament overall.)

I’ll be back when the next player qualifies for the Tournament of Champions or at the end of April whichever comes first. (You never know with Jeopardy.)

 

Friday, April 4, 2025

Homicide Rewatch: The Last of the Watermen

 

Written by Henry Bromell & Tom Fontana

Directed by Richard Pearce

 

This is a stumble for Homicide, not just for Season 3 but for much of the series overall. This is unfortunate in some ways, better than others.

This episode might be some combination of one draft or too much network interference from a very good episode and a part of me is inclined to think it’s the latter. Even at this stage in its run Homicide has already proven that it is willing to shake up the format of the procedural. We saw in ‘Night of the Dead Living’ in Season 1 and in Bop Gun in Season 2. Indeed during the third season the writers will do at least two other major shakeups to the formula that will rank among the highpoints of the series. And it’s not like the show hasn’t been hinting at it with every character at some point in the run, wariness with the job has already become second nature to the detectives and you can imagine a moment like this becoming simply too much for one of the detectives and they just decide they need a break from the action.

It also helps that so far in the series we know relatively little about all of the detectives’s personal lives and what we know is fairly depressing. We’ve spent two seasons dealing with the fallout from Bolander’s divorce and his efforts to find love again and we’ve just witnessed how truly toxic Felton’s marriage has been. And considering that too this point we know fairly little about Howard’s personal life despite what she tells us, looking into where she came from might not be the worst idea. It might seem a little cliched by today’s standards -  a female detective so sick of the job she takes personal lime mid-case – but up until this point Kay has been seen basically as the adult in the partnership she has with Felton. And given everything that’s happened to her so far this season: playing a buffer between Beau and his wife, the repercussions of Crosetti’s suicide – it would be normal for anyone to need a break. Besides Howard has prided herself on being one of the boys to this point and there’s something very masculine about how she talks about the neighborhood she’s in involving the smell of crap and urban decay. So there’s merit to taking a break.

There’s also a rough draft of a good idea of Howard’s return to what appears to be the home of oystermen, which seem to be the blue collar routes of where she came from. It’s also clear she hasn’t been back home to her small town in  a long time; she’s stunned to learn that her father has retired from working the oyster boat, meaning she hasn’t even talked to him in a while. (Considering her relationship with her sister seems to be much closer this is telling.) And a lot of the discussion between her and her father Wesley is incredibly awkward. It’s clear he has only the most basic perception of what she does: “I don’t shoot people. I catch people who shoot people” she tells him. It’s clear in their interactions in the episode Wesley has never truly known what to make of his daughter and doesn’t seem able to connect the same way. We see her visit her grave of her mother, who we learned from an early episode died of breast cancer very young.

We also get a glimpse of her personal life in her first love Chick, who’s still on the water and who tells her very bluntly that both his job and the town itself are dying out. (This is a theme that will come into play that will come in Season 2 of The Wire which takes place on Baltimore’s waterfront.) The job of being an oysterman is being regulated to death by environmentalists, represented by Dr. Bradley. Here, perhaps more clearly then any other episode in the career of Simon as a writer, we see the conflict between the death of work and the government regulation. We see the ripple effects on a small town and how there doesn’t seem to be a good answer between environmentalism and blue collar jobs. Bradley has no good answers either and there’s just anger behind.

All of this has the benchmarks of a deep, interesting episode but I get the feeler that either Fontana or NBC wasn’t comfortable enough to see Kay Howard just living out her version of “you can’t go home again.’ So naturally after Howard sees the anger at a local bar, she’s awakened at her house at 2 AM to be called in by the sheriff to tell her that Bradley is dead, clearly murdered. Worse this is the first murder in six years in her town, so naturally the sheriff asks for her help.

All of the trademark naturalism of Homicide – the murder is committed by the most likely suspect and the truth leaves a wreck – can’t hide the fact that this is more the trappings of Murder, She Wrote (which was still on the air in 1994) and Kay Howard is a much younger Jessica Fletcher. The fact that Fontana chooses to do this with his most prominent female character (at this point) also works against it. The show was on stronger ground last season with See No Evil and it dealt with it more directly; the fact that the writers don’t feel confident enough to grant the same grace to Howard shows their own flaw.

And the final minutes really hurt as well as we see Howard return to the office, apparently refreshed and joking around after a vacation where a man was killed, she had to help participate in the arrest of a friend and her own brother was quietly complicit. I have a reason why there might be more to it than that (I’ll get to it at the end) but it doesn’t look particularly good.

What hurts the most is that this is an episode where the ‘B’ story is so much stronger than the one involving Howard as the lead. The episode follows the murder at the start where Felton and Howard have been called into investigate the murder of a seventy year old woman who has been beaten, stabbed to death, and has had her tongue cut out and stuffed back in her mouth. Howard is disgusted by this and cuts out but Felton is the primary and he needs a partner. Gee decided to team with Pembleton.

This leads to a story that is filled both with enormous tension and humor, sometimes interchangeably. We already know how much Felton and Frank despise each other from a distance and now they’re working in close proximity. This leads to some superb moments from both of them. Felton says he wants to close this case because he hasn’t had a murder in some time. Pembleton says he just closed the Griswold case. Felton looks at Frank. That was a killing.

“Kenny Griswold was a smoke hound with a rap sheet as long as your arm. His death, like his life, was meaningless. Audrey Resnick was a sweet old woman who was killed in what should have been the safety of her own home. That’s a waste of life.”

It’s worth noting this is the first time we’ve heard Felton sound passionate about any murder on the job. But Frank takes offense: “Who are we to judge a person’s life?” Felton asks him if the death shocks him. Pembleton acknowledges Resnick’s death does as well as several other horrible ones:

I’m also shocked by the death of Kenny Griswold, a worthless smoke hound. Because Felton where I come from every life has meaning. “

Then as he walks off: “Even yours, Felton.”

We see Frank spend much of the episode trying to focus, to a ridiculous extent as to why Audrey’s tongue was cut out and stuffed in her mouth. This is an oddity for Frank who doesn’t usually focus as much on the why as the who. Felton actually figures out on the basics: he gets evidence that Audrey’s grandson Artie was living with her, they find a knife with blood on it and his fingerprints are on it. All they have to do is find Artie.

This leads to another tension filled and hysterical scene where Felton and Pembleton go to Artie’s hang out on a half court and in the process start playing a pickup basketball game. Very quickly this stops being a team sport and a one-on-one between the two detectives, as the teens increasingly look on in exasperation and leave with the ball – to the irritation of Frank.

Finally they manage to run down Artie Resnick, who confesses immediately. He doesn’t have a reason for doing it and when Frank asks why he cut out his grandmother’s tongue he just says, “She talked too much.” Frank seems almost disappointed; Felton just shoves him in the car. It’s always fun watching Braugher and Baldwin play off each other; it’s more fun to see Felton’s approach more accurate than Pembleton’s.

I’ve always thought it was off when Kay comes back after everything she’s been through on her ‘vacation’ seeming refreshed. Years later I wonder about that moment before she comes back in the door. Kay has a blank look on her face when she enters the room and the moment Gee talks to her, she starts engaging in small talk, bantering with the detectives. When Beau who was annoyed by what happened asks her if her vacation was good she just says: “It was fine” and is non-committal. Perhaps Fontana and Bromell are suggested that there are two Kay Howards, the one with a personal life and the job one and she needs to make clear that the two never mesh. Her experience back home made it clear she belongs in Baltimore but she’ll never admit she’s was wrong either. So she says everything’s fine and catches the next call.

Homicide learns from its mistakes and while it will probe the detectives personal lives repeatedly to better effect, it will never make the same effort to have the two intersect the same way they do in Last of the Watermen. That’s the best you can saw about this flawed but interesting episode. Like the characters they try to learn from their mistakes.

 

NOTES FROM THE BOARD

“Detective Munch’: In a brilliant opening teaser we see Giardello going to the laundromat on a Sunday and finding Munch there. Munch turns out to be just as annoying being friendly as he is at work and Giardello ends up walking away from him to read the paper. We also hear Munch strenuously arguing with Lewis about having a TV at the bar as Lewis and Bayliss argue they need something there to enjoy sports. “Why not just add nock hockey?” Munch said exasperated. Bayliss asks what that is.

FIRST APPEARANCE OF: M.E. Alyssa Dyer, played by Harlee McBride (aka Mrs. Richard Belzer!) McBride was a former Playboy Playmate, known to (ahem) some viewers for her work in the 1970s film Young Lady Chatterley. Her character would appear on a semi-regular basis from this point until the end of the series.

Also in her first speaking role is Kristin Rohde as Officer Sally Rogers. Rohde will appear repeatedly as one of the beat  cops on the scene in many of the murders the squad is called too. By the time Homicide came to an end Fontana had cast her in a larger and more significant role as C.O Claire Howell on OZ. She would go on to start in various roles in Law and Order SVU and Criminal Intent. Tragically she passed away in December of 2016 at the age of 52.

STREAMING NOTE: The Peacock broadcast once again cuts out the music for this episode. The major song that plays in the episode is Counting Crows ‘Raining in Baltimore.” I don’t recognize the song that plays in the Peacock version. This is another major cut that is not present on the DVD and may not be present on Amazon. This time I think it hurts the episode: the melancholy tone of the song as Kay goes back home really does set up what we are about to see.

 

 

Thursday, April 3, 2025

OZ Looked At The Horrors of Our Criminal Justice System Before It Was Hip

 

 

There’s a part of me who wonders if everybody was so enraptured by the brilliance of The Sopranos that no one bothered to ask the very obvious questions about it in the aftermath of all the shows on HBO that followed up. By and large female critics like Emily Nussbaum chose to ignore it when it was on the air and it’s only a quarter of a century after the fact that the questions are being raised at all – though tellingly not to David Chase himself even a quarter of a century later.

Because the real reason The Sopranos is an outlier among not just great television but every series HBO itself did in the immediate aftermath and well past it is frankly just how much of an argument for how much it epitomizes the worst parts of our history and today. As I’ve written before on numerous occasions the Soprano families, both criminal and by blood, were entirely and completely dominated by white cis males. The New Jersey and New York the Soprano family was a part of didn’t seem to have a single African-American, LatinX or Asian people in it: there was never at any point in the six seasons it was on the air that there was a single regular who was a person of color. This sticks out like a sore thumb with the next three HBO dramas that were to follow The Sopranos: what does it say that Deadwood had roles of more depth for minorities during three seasons than The Sopranos ever did? As I’ve mentioned before the female characters were little more than there to show how they reacted off Tony than anything else (Six Feet Under from the start did more to let its female regulars expand from the roles of mother, daughter and girlfriend) and the series was more homophobic and unwilling to show range than any of the dramas of that period and well past it. (There was no Omar Little of any kind in Jersey.)

Chase can argue about the story of humanity he was trying to tell about how given the opportunity people will take the easiest choices possible but that falls apart when the vast majority of your characters are white males who  by definition in the world have more choices then the rest of us. It’s even harder to make that choice about humanity when all around you are white people in suburbia who by definition seem to have made one of their choices to stay away from the ‘real world’ as possible.

That may be one of the biggest reasons that OZ was never really considered being as groundbreaking – or perhaps tellingly, more critically acclaimed – as The Sopranos was. Ironically when Tom Fontana was given the choice to make his project for HBO, he decided to make a series where almost everyone we met from the start to the finish was in a place when they had no choices at all. We’re told that very clearly by Diane Wittelsey in the first five minutes (“We will tell you when to eat.” When to sleep. When to piss. Follow the rules.”)  McManus (Terry Kinney) uses Em City as an experimental wing in an effort to build a better life for his inmates and from the start we see he is considered a joke by the majority of the staff and only tolerated by Leo Glynn (Ernie Hudson). Kareem Said when he enters Em City and is told that he will be treated as an equal says humorously: “How ironic. To finally be treated as an equal and I do not have the freedom to enjoy it.”

Fontana also made it very clear from the start of the show to the very end to make as difficult as possible for the viewer to have any sympathy for the prisoners. Every time he introduced one of the prisoners, he would show us in great detail what they had done to get there and with few exceptions it was always an act of horrible, graphic violence. Then he would have his narrator Augustus Hill made it clear what it was like. Oz is where I live. Where I will die. Where most of us will die” he tells us in the first minute of the show. And this is a mission statement Fontana keeps for nearly every regular we meet: the only way to leave Oz is in a body bag.

And Fontana made no effort to skimp on how horrible this was in the Pilot: we see an incoming inmate get stabbed in the first two minutes, we witness (not graphically) a rape and assault of one we’ve just met, there is a beating of one inmate, a suffocation of another and by the end of the episode the character we’ve been led to thing will be the lead is doused in gasoline and burned alive. If anything Fontana kept doubling down on that whenever he had a chance to, and he never let us forget just how horrible the crimes committed were every inmate we met, making it harder to feel anything resembling sympathy for many.

OZ was also, perhaps even more The Wire would be a few years later, an indictment of the criminal justice system in all his horrors. This could also have been a reason why so many critics reacted poorly to it. To that point in television, police procedurals had illustrated the cops as unequivocally the heroes and the people they locked up unequivocally the villains. (It’s worth noting with a few key exceptions, much of today’s procedurals still lean very hard on that definition.)  Fontana had tried on a few occasions on his previous show Homicide to give humanity to some of the killers that were arrested in Baltimore but he and his writers were still sympathetic to the detectives more than the criminals. OZ asked a lot of its audience: not just to try and empathize with drug dealers, rapists and killers but to argue that they were worthy of being treated with dignity, if not sympathy. And it did so, it’s worth noting, without bothering to show any efforts to reform or rehabilitate many of these same criminals: OZ made it very clear that these men were just as violent and brutal locked up as they were on the outside. (Orange is the New Black, for all its brilliance, couldn’t help but be more sympathetic to the prisoners then it was to their crimes.)

The series made its most direct attempt to argue this in its first season, focusing almost all of its action in Em City. (Later seasons would spend more time in some of the other cell blocks at Oswald.) This unfolded through two parallel storylines, one focused from without, one from within.

The outside was the actions of Governor Jim Devlin (Zeljko Ivanek), who was essentially the real villain of OZ. Devlin was apparently elected governor on a tough on crime policy and the effects were constantly being felt throughout Oswald. In the first episode smoking is banned in the prison; in the second, conjugals are. Not long after Oz brings the death penalty back and Devlin makes it very clear he wants Jefferson Keane (Leon) to be tried and executed under this standard. As Sister Pete points out Keane is being executed because he is an African-American male and that is done to quell the mob. (Perhaps in aware of this in the second season we will meet Shirley Bellinger, the first woman to be sentenced to death in nearly a hundred fifty years.)

It’s worth noting we constantly hear news reports about Devlin and how he is facing corruption charges, is being accused of infidelity and has made it clear he won’t resign even if he’s impeached. Ivanek does some of his work as an actor playing Devlin as loathsome, corrupt and without a single sense of humanity. He constantly compares himself to Zeus and untouchable. Fontana’s sickest joke of the series is that Devlin is right, in the course of the series he survives an assassination attempt, is reelected governor (and makes it clear that the shooting probably helped him) and by the end of the series arranges for the man who did the most to get him elected to be killed in order to protect himself. This comes out at the end of the series but by that point McManus is cynical enough to believe he’ll still wiggle out of it.

Every time Devlin shows up at Oswald or  on television, he makes it very clear that he doesn’t view the prisoners as human beings. Devlin at one point makes it clear to McManus that this view is held by his constituents and the public at large. The sad truth is the position is also held by most of the guards, the staff and probably the warden. Only a relative few see them as human being and they are often punished for that.

When Said shows up he makes it clear in his first interaction of what he’s planning: “We can take this prison at any time,” he tells Glynn and McManus cheerfully. Glynn says: “You can take it but can you hold it?” Said smiles. “That remains to be seen.” It’s clear from the start Said intends to unify his Muslim brethren (another radical idea in 1990s television) and makes it clear of his own attempts. When he is threatened by Jefferson Keene, he orders one of his new followers to hit him again and again until he bleeds. Keane is struck by this.

He will eventually convert to Islam but not long after his actions come back to haunt him and he ends up being sentenced to death row. Said serves as his spiritual adviser  during this period. In a truly powerful moment he walks with Keane towards his final resting place: “Death is not to be feared.” When Keane says he doesn’t have his kufi, Said hands him his.

It’s clear throughout the season that Said is trying to mobilize the prison to his side. This becomes the clearest in the penultimate episode when after one of his followers betrays him he orders him shunned. Not long after he commits suicide and Said uses the opportunity to stage a press conference to suggest there are questions about his death. Glynn calls for a media blackout. (“Why is blackout such a negative term?” Said jests. “You can get whiteout in a little bottle.”) During this period McManus aims a shot at the Muslims telling them they can not use their religious apparel, such as mats or beads. Said is the first to hand his kufi over. “This is a meaningless gesture,” he assures them.

What’s striking is throughout this entire season (and for several seasons afterward) Said is constantly arguing a path of non-violent resistance and it is working among his brethren and impressing his followers. He intends by the end of the season to stage the riot but in one of those great ironies, it happens without him.

By this point the inmates of Em City have been boiling for what may have been months. In addition to everything else the recent murder of a guard and a weapons raid has led to much of their privileges being taken away and so many random beatings by guards that most of the guards are on suspension. Everyone knows something is coming but it starts by accident: two inmates start a fight over a game of checkers and it starts to spread. One of the inmates overpowers a guard. Within minutes the remaining guard have been grabbed, and Father Mukada (B.D. Wong) has been taken prisoner. Chaos has all but overridden, the inmates have taken control of the doors and McManus’s office and are throwing furniture everywhere. At that point Said takes control, pulls out a gun (which he was given during the last episode) and fires a shot in the air. “Now let’s get organized!”

Within a very short time the inmates have barricaded the doors and are moving the hostages around. Glynn has shutdown every cell block and he and McManus (who was out of his unit at the time) run to Em City. He demands to know if there’s anyone we can talk too. Said’s name is shouted. Everyone starts chanting Said’s name. “What is this about?” “If you have to ask Glynn, we have a long day ahead of!” he says as he dons his prayer beads to a shout of reverence.

By this point we know most of the leaders of the riot Said, Miguel Alvarez (Kirk Acevedo) leader of the Latinos, Scott Ross (Steve Gevedon) who controls the Aryans and the bikers, Simon Adebisi (Adewale Akinnouye-Agbaje) leader of the gangsters and Ryan O’Reilly (Dean Winters) who has no power but has spent the season manipulated the prisoners as well as Said has into a position of influence. Said takes a position of delegating responsibility but its hard to no how much control he really has. However, he manages to get them to work together on a list of demands.

We are told in later seasons the riot lasts three days but because the entire series is set indoors we have no clear idea of the passage of time. What we do know is that soon enough Devlin shows up and makes it very clear of his law and order type doctrine. He makes it clear he’s going public and calls in the National Guard. Not long after the rioters ask for food, something Devlin scoffs at but Glynn overrules. McManus agrees to go in with in order to find out about the hostages. “You’re even dumber than I thought,” Devlin says dismissively.

McManus does go in and sees that two of the hostages – Armstong and Mineo – need medical attention. He offers to trade himself for the two of them and Wittelsey, not just the only female but his former lover. Ross starts to flex saying they don’t have to let anyone go but Said says they will live up to their bargain. When he’s asked why he says: “Because if we don’t, we become just like them. And we won’t get our list of demands.” Eventually the leaders agree to let Armstrong and Mineo go but not Wittelsey. O’Reilly hands over a letter explaining the exchange and the demands.

We never get a clear idea of the full list but Glynn later says most of them are harmless “bringing back conjugal visits, smoking” Devlin says bluntly: “I don’t negotiate with animals.” “Then how do you expect to handle this?” “The old fashioned way. With force.” That Devlin thinks the same thing of the hostages as he does the prisoners shows that all he cares about is looking tough on crime.

It is during this period that McManus demands to talk with Said and the parallels to what we have been seeing onscreen are made direct as McManus reveals his background:

“I grew up in a town in upstate New York. And the only thing there was a prison. Everyone either worked at the prison or made money off it…My dad ran a diner. I was about to celebrate my tenth birthday and I was very excited. A few days before it happened, there was a riot at the prison. It lasted four days but then the governor called in the National Guard and ordered them to take the prison back. They did. Firing at anything that moved. So when the tear gas cleared 31 prisoners and nine guards were dead.

Said: “Attica.”

McManus: Three of my friends fathers died. Instead of going to my birthday we went to a memorial.

Said responds with scorn. “And that’s what Em City is? Your birthday party?”

McManus then utters some of his most memorable lines in the series, ones that are called back later.

“We’re on the verge of disaster; we’re on the brink of oblivion. Now before we join hands and jump, I want another chance.”

Said: Not mine to give.

McManus: YES IT IS!

Said: NO ITS NOT! Because even the best prison wouldn’t be good enough!

Said then delivers his own impassioned speech:

I’m going to try to explain this to you one last time. I’m not saying the men in this prison are innocent. I’m saying they are here not because of the crimes they committed but because of the color of their skin! Their lack of education! The fact that they are poor! This riot isn’t about getting smoking back, conjugal rights. It’s not even about life in prison. It’s about the hoary judicial system. We don’t need better prisons, bigger prisons. We need better justice. Now what can you do about that?”

McManus, of course, has no answer to this question. Instead he puts it personally:

If we don’t resolve this, you and me, and soon. People will die. You could die.

And Said makes his nobility clear.

“I am willing to lay down my life for change. Now those deaths at Attica brought real change and real reform. But everyone’s forgotten the lessons of your home town. It’s time to wake this country up again…You want to save this place. I want to destroy it. Brick by hypocritical brick.”

Not long after this the troopers do storm the prison. Six prisoners and two guards are killed, twenty more are injured. McManus himself is shot and nearly dies as a result. In the outcry over the deaths Devlin forms a commission to investigate the cause of the riot but its clear what he wants is for them to clear him of any wrongdoing and to blame all of the prisoners for what happened. He is more than willing to bribe and bully many of them and he offers the position of attorney general to the head of the Commission.

I may go over the episode in a later article but I will deal with the results. At the end of the investigation Devlin is infuriated by the results which doesn’t involving charging the prisoners. The head of the commission Alvah Case (Charles S. Dutton) tells him why:

Case: “From a legal standpoint the evidence is circumstantial. From a moral one, it’s laughable.

Devlin is angry.

Devlin: “I want those bastards tried on television.

Case: Look governor as far as I can see those deaths are a direct result of your actions. Yes the Commission cleared you, but you can’t have it both ways. If the prisoners are guilty so are you.”

For perhaps the only time in the series Devlin is put in check by one of the few characters on the show with any pure integrity. As a result of the commission, the rioters are let back out with no charges and Em City is eventually rebuilt with new rules. And everyone seems to have learned some lessons from this: while tension and violence flow throughout the rest of the series, nothing even close to the events of the riot ever happen again.

OZ is a far darker show than The Sopranos is but it’s far more realistic – and in a funny way, more optimistic – then the one Chase ever put together. Death comes at a more constant rate in Oswald then it does in Em City but in argues even in a place where all of your freedom has been taken away, you can still find ways to change and grow. That it does so in a maximum security prison that should represent the worst of humanity (even compared to Tony and his crew) shows that for all the grimness of Fontana’s setting and the bleakness of the souls of the inmates and some of the staff, you can find optimism in what should be a hopeless place.

That was likely too much for some critics and even viewers during this period to handle and it may be part of the reason that few may write testimonials to OZ the same way they have The Sopranos and so much of HBO’s other extraordinary dramas. But Fontana and his cast were asking questions that are, if anything, more relevant today as we wrestle with the consequences of mass incarceration, the death penalty and the rights of prisoners, particularly in a world that seems even more polarized on the issues that they were in 1997 and the impassioned arguments made by Said during that period are no less relevant today than they were then. And that it does so with a cast that has been part of the television landscape ever since it aired showed how much impact it had one how the Golden Age unfolded.

That’s also the reason I think OZ is a more important and better show than The Sopranos. It’s not just that it had a more diverse cast, had better roles for women and dealt with issues of homosexuality that were the first real steps towards it becoming part of the television landscape. It’s that it was about something in a way that The Sopranos wasn’t, but that The Wire and Deadwood were. It makes you feel sympathy for men who frequently have to work to rise themselves to be antiheroes and gives an explanation for who they are in a way The Sopranos just says everybody is. And unlike Chase, Fontana argues that they do have the capacity to change even if they may not think themselves possible of it or if no one in the outside world ever sees it.

 

Wednesday, April 2, 2025

The Oscars and International Directors, Part 3: The 1980s

 

 

For most of the history of Hollywood to this point by and large international directors had not made much of an impact in the traditional American film system  and with the exception of Antonioni and Truffaut very few American actors had been involved in them. Perhaps it was fitting that the director of the first  international film to receive a best picture nomination would cross that barrier.

After his groundbreaking Z Costa-Gavras had spent the 1970s continuing the make movies in France. Then in 1982 Universal Pictures had given him the greenlight to make his first American feature. Missing tells the story of how during the Chilean Coup which overthrew the Democratically elected Marxist leader Salvador Allende and installed the Pinochet regime (a measure sanctioned by the Nixon administration) an idealist American writer (John Shea) goes missing and his wife (Sissy Spacek and father (Jack Lemmon) go to Chile to try and find him. Released that March the film became one of the most critically acclaimed of 1982 and essentially told the kind of story Z had in a more American based setting. The film would win Best Picture and Best Actor at Cannes and be nominated for five Golden Globes.

The movie would be nominated for Best Picture that year in one of the better lineups of that decade: ET, Tootsie, The Verdict and Gandhi. Jack Lemmon received his eighth – and last – Academy Award nomination while Sissy Spacek received her third for Best Actress. Costa-Gavras was nominated for Best Screenplay but of the five nominees for Best Picture he would not receive a corresponding Best Director nod  - for reasons he might sympathize with.

The previous year one of the nominees for Best Foreign Film by the Golden Globes was Das Boot, the story of a German U-Boat stalking the North Atlantic during World War II.  Billed as ‘The Other Side of World War II, it had been a box office smash in America earning near $12 million in U.S. It also shot to international attention Wolfgang Petersen, who had been directing West Germany since he was 24.

That year Das Boot made history when it received more Academy Award nominations then any international film in history with seven. Among them were two for Petersen for directing and screenwriting.

Immediately after that Petersen would be signed to direct The Neverending Story. This decision was immensely decried as many thought he had sacrificed his eye for detail for ‘standard commercial Hollywood blockbusters’. The fact remains that many of those movies are among the most highly regarded ‘commercial Hollywood blockbusters’ by critics, not just Neverending Story but the masterpiece In The Line of Fire and such well received films as Air Force One and The Perfect Storm. Petersen’s shifting to Hollywood was the first sign of a sea change in how international directors would be willing to work with American studios.

Costa-Gavras would make films in both France and America. His most acclaimed one in America would be Music Box in which Jessica Lange plays a lawyer who defends her father (Armin Mueller-Stahl) accused of being a Nazi war criminal. Lange would be nominated for Best Actress for her work. His last film he made with an American studio was Mad City where Dustin Hoffman plays a reporter trying to take an advantage of a hostage situation to resurrect his career. In 1997 it may have been only slightly ahead of its time.

1983 witnessed one of the most notorious slights in Academy history. That year Barbara Streisand had astonished the industry when she became the first actress of any note to write, directed, produce and star in a major Hollywood film with Yentl. While the film was polarizing – the movie was nominated for Razzies as well as Golden Globes, it made history at the latter. The film won Best Comedy or Musical as Barbara Streisand became the first – and still the only – woman to win Best Director for the Golden Globes. An Oscar nomination in every category seemed all but certain.

But on the day of the nominations Streisand was completely skunked even though Yentl was nominated for five other Oscars. It wasn’t the most bizarre of the oddities that year: The Right Stuff was nominated for Best Picture but writer-director Philip Kaufmann was completely ignored while Silkwood was nominated for Best Director and Best Screenplay but not Best Picture. What led to the biggest uproar was who one of the Best Director nominees was.

In 1982 Ingmar Bergman had made what he claimed at the time would be his last film (he would back away from that) Fanny & Alexander. Nearly four hours long and one of his most autobiographical movies to that point, it told the story of two young Swedish children and the comedies and tragedies of their family. The film had been highly regarded by Critics from the moment it debut; it won Best Foreign Film in LA and New York Film Critics and the New York Film Critics had given Bergman their Best Director prize yet again. The film had won Best Foreign Film at the Golden Globes and Bergman had been nominated for Best Director – and tellingly the Directors Guild Award while Streisand had not been. But the nominees had also included Philip Kaufman and Lawrence Kasdan for The Big Chill and they had been excluded as well; the fact that Bergman was included was a bridge too far and not just for those who were devoted to Streisand.

On Oscar night Fanny & Alexander was, with the exception of Terms of Endearment the biggest winner with four Academy Awards, winning Best Foreign Film, Best Costume Design, Best Art Direction and Best Cinematography. Bergman never directed another film but he continued to write up until 2003. By that point, however, the Oscars had their fill of him; he never received another nomination of any kind.

If the events of 1983 caused a firestorm what would happen two years later caused an earthquake. In 1985 Steven Spielberg, at this point known as the most successful director in Hollywood, famously said: “I’m going into the deep end of the pool. That meant making his first truly serious film. Collaborating with Quincy Jones he would work to adapt Alice Walker’s already iconic novel The Color Purple to the big screen.

While he would be treated with mixed opinions by critics at the time and while several African-Americans were annoyed that a white man was retelling the story of an African-American woman, it is impossible to believe in 1985 anyone but Spielberg had the clout to get the film greenlit, much less directed it. The movie opened slowly on Christmas weekend but it very quickly became a box office sensation and shot its unknown leads Whoopi Goldberg and Oprah Winfrey to superstardom.

Then on the nomination day The Color Purple was nominated for eleven Oscars, tied with Out Of Africa. But none of them were for Steven Spielberg. And in what was an eerie echo of 1975 when he had been slighted by the Academy for Federico Fellini, it was even harder to look at it differently this time. Spielberg had been nominated for the Directors Guild Award and three of his fellow nominees were present: John Huston for Prizzi’s Honor, Peter Weir for Witness and Sydney Pollack for Out of Africa. Hector Babenco had been nominated for Kiss of the Spider Woman but the movie had been nominated for Best Picture, Actor and Screenplay as well. No one complained about that. It was the fifth nominee that sent everybody in alarm.

Akira Kurosawa was one of the greatest filmmakers in history. The reason he was known only to a relative few in 1985 was because he was Japanese. Anyone who knew anything about films at all knew that meant nothing. The movies he wrote and directed are ranked among the greatest of all time by even the casual film lover: Rashomon, Ikiru, Seven Samurai, Yojimbo, The Hidden Fortress, Throne of Blood. We see the impact of his movies in America for years, sometimes more directly than others – The Magnificent Seven and even Star Wars bear his imprint. And yet in large part to the frequent European drive towards international film, not a single one of his films had even been nominated for Best Foreign film or anything else.

Then at 75 he made a film that is considered one of his greatest Ran. With influences in King Lear it tells the story of an elderly warlord who retires and hands his empire to his free sons. Their new power corrupts them causing them to turn on each other and on him. A project Kurosawa had been trying to get made for nearly twenty years he had finally done so by 1985.

The film put Kurosawa back into the spotlight among his lovers and critics went out of their way to recognize him. The National Board of Review gave them their prize for Best Director and his movie dominated the foreign film awards across the globe. The film would be nominated for Best Foreign Film at the Golden Globes but would lose to Argentina’s The Official Story. Still everyone thought that would be as far as it went.

Then on nomination day Kurosawa was nominated for Best Director and Spielberg wasn’t. The movie world went into an uproar. Spielberg would end up being given his first Directors Guild Award almost as a consolation prize but in what was the biggest shutout in Oscar history The Color Purple didn’t win a single one of its eleven nominations. When Out Of Africa did – ironically Kurosawa was one of three directors who ended up presenting Best Picture that year – it stunned Hollywood that had never thought that much of the film to begin with. That The Color Purple was unrecognized is a stain on the Oscars during that period; for Spielberg sadly, it was just another slight he had to live with.

The last major slight of the 1980s came just two years later and while it hasn’t ranked in the historical record as much as those that Spielberg and Streisand underwent, it makes the Oscars look even worse. That said, it would be yet another indication of how the world of Hollywood was letting in more directors.

One of the more surprising critical sensations and box office sensations of 1987 came from a Swedish import but it bore nothing resembling of the tone that Bergman had let them know. My Life as A Dog was a simple, wistful comedy telling the story a young boy in small town Sweden named Ingemar who is sent to left with relatives while his terminally ill mother is in her final stages. We see him live in a small town, dealing with charming people and watch him fall in love – though he doesn’t know it – with a tomboy. Much of the story centers around the boxing matches between Ingemar Johnson and Floyd Paterson, the second of which is the climax of the film.

This sweet, simple film was the product of Lasse Hallstrom, who might have been known even in his home country for his direction of the music videos of ABBA more than anything else. The film warmed the hearts of critics across the world, winning Best Foreign film from the LA to New York, the Independent Spirit Awards and the Golden Globes. Still when he was nominated for the Director’s Guild Award, no one thought much of it.

And then on nomination day, Hallstrom was nominated for Best Director and Best Screenplay. It was considered a miracle by those who’d never even thought it could earn distribution in America. But one person who didn’t think so was James L. Brooks.

That year Brook had directed his follow-up film to the Oscar winner Terms of Endearment Broadcast News an exceptional story about a love triangle between a news producer, a self-doubting reporter and a new anchor. The film had been a critical and box office hit and one of the biggest award winners leading up to the nominations. Holly Hunter had dominated the prizes for Best Actress, Albert Brook has won the Boston Society of film critics prize for Best Actor, William Hurt continued his hot streak that had started with The Big Chill and the film had swept the five top prizes at the New York Film Critics  -Picture, Director, Actor (Jack Nicholson, who also was honored for Witches of Eastwick and Ironweed) Actress and Screenplay.

And then on nomination day Broadcast News was nominated for Best Picture, along with Hope & Glory, Moonstruck, The Last Emperor and Fatal Attraction. Brooks was the only director of a nominated film who was nominated. Just as with Color Purple the year before, Broadcast News was completely shutout, though because it was a comedy that was less shocking than Color Purple.

Just before presenting Best Director Robin Williams, himself a first time Oscar nominee that year, stated “And along with an Oscar, this year the Academy is giving out a green card”. Neither Hallstrom nor Bernardo Bertolucci (who would receive the prize) seemed to find this funny. But in a sense it was a reality for Hallstrom.

Like Petersen, he would find acceptance in Hollywood. Unlike Petersen, no one could accuse Hallstrom of selling out as his sweetness and attention to detail led him to make some of the most quiet and critically acclaimed films of the 1990s. These would include such works as What’s Eating Gilbert Grape, which earned Leonardo DiCaprio his first Oscar nomination, The Cider House Rules which would be nominated for seven Oscars including a second director nomination for Hallstrom and Chocolat, best known for its overpromotion at the 2000 Oscars but still a sweet film. Later films tended towards overblown romances (Dear John, Safe Haven) but the touch is still there with some of them.

In the final piece of this series I will deal with the 1990s and how it laid the groundwork for the official reopening of the Academy Awards to international films that we see to this day.

Tuesday, April 1, 2025

A Man Spoke on The Floor of the Senate Tonight - And It Gives Me Hope and Makes Me Proud

 

 

In the narrowest  sense of the word what Cory Booker has done  for the past 25 hours matters very little to the grand scheme of things. He endorses no legislation or is saying nothing that has not been said in some sense countless times before over the last decade and will no doubt be said countless times again.

In another sense it is little more the kind of performative activism I have railed against in this column so many times and which I find loathsome. Nothing Booker does will likely changed the most vehement opposition to his point of view, which at best is held by half the country and may very well be held by more of the still unenlightened minds which will forever fill the nation and the world.

It's even possible that this will do nothing more than accomplish a momentary stir in the news cycle which seems to change on a minute by minute basis. Given what comes out of Washington these days in mere minutes all of this may change again and our attention will go to something else. It depends just how many people are even paying attention now.

But the thing is even if nothing is changed immediately or long term, its impact on me and maybe the rest of the country needs to be remembered. As someone who has more insight into political history then most I am more aware of the significance then the average millennial or social media user. Perhaps even the self-styled progressives will still scoff at is as meaningless. But for anyone who argues that America is not capable of changing, who still wants to hold to the idea that we are still essentially the same country that we were when the republic was founded and that America can not and will not change, what Cory Booker did – and is doing – gives lie to that very concept that America is still the same nation it was in 1619 or 1776. And while there are many ways to define it, I think the very best way is to talk about two men who, save for the fact that they both served in the Senate, have nothing else in common and for good reason.

The first is J. Strom Thurmond. Thurmond was born in 1902 and died in 2004. His life spans, for all intents and purposes, the entirety of 20th century America. This era that brought about transformative and radical changes – all of which, it’s safe to say, Thurmond was against for his entire life.

He came from South Carolina, the state whose secession from the Union was the final step that led to the Civil War. Thurmond would have been the first to tell you otherwise but make no mistake the war was solely about the right of men of the white race to own men of the black race to make them rich on land they would never own from birth to death, toss them aside and use their children to work the same land.

When the war ended South Carolina did little to acknowledge anything had changed. They didn’t enslave black men but they were just as free to kill them for any reason and deny them basic human rights. The North, which had ostensibly gone to war to free them, had little use for them as a citizens in the South and for the better part of three quarters of a century let Jim Crow reign.

Thurmond was born and completely embraced the idea that ‘the Negro’ was naturally inferior to white men and deserved no humanity at all. Back then, black women were for practically property so he had no problem to have ‘relations’ with his domestic and father a half-black daughter with him. This only troubled him – slightly – when he decided to enter politics. Not because South Carolina would find what he had done criminal but because it might hurt him in a campaign down the road. So he bought the domestic’s silence and his daughter’s existence only came to light after he died nearly a century later. It certainly did nothing to make black people human beings.

He was a Democrat only because there was no other path to political power in South Carolina. He had little use for the New Deal aside from what it could do for South Carolina and while he fought in World War II he saw no contradiction in fighting to stop an ideology based fundamentally on racism overseas and going back to his home state to protect that same ideology. He would soon be elected as Governor and in 1948 – reluctantly – became the Presidential candidate for the so-called Dixiecrats, a wing of deep Southern Democrat representatives who thought Harry Truman’s efforts into civil rights a betrayal of their way of life. Thurmond would proudly speak of segregation and win 4 states in the electoral college, including South Carolina.

Not long after that he would run for Senate as a write-in candidate. Still a Democrat and increasingly angry against the movement for civil rights coming from ‘Northern agitators’, he would be more inflexible then even some of his more senior Southern Senators. As the Supreme Court and other institutions moved forward he wanted to make sure the South stayed where it had always been. For that reason he crafted the Southern Manifesto and gathered signatures from Southern Congressmen and Senator, making it clear the South would vigorous oppose any bill that involved civil rights.

And in 1957 when Eisenhower’s administration combined with majority leader Lyndon Johnson to introduce the first Civil Rights Act of any kind since Reconstruction, he demanded that Richard Russell and his fellow Senators filibuster it. When they refused on August 28th, he spoke for 24 hours and 27 minutes, shattering the record for the longest speech in Senate history. This speech was denounced by Russell and his fellow Senators – no fans of civil rights – as grandstanding and making a cheap stand for his own reelection.

The bill – weak as it was – did pass. And Thurmond spent the next half a century in the Senate. Eventually he would leave the Democratic Party altogether when President Johnson endorsed another Civil Rights bill, a much stronger one. He’d never really been comfortable in the party anyway and spent the rest of the century as the clearest representative of how the conservative movement which would involve the Republican dominance of the South and for all intents and purposes the very worst aspects of what America truly is.

Now consider Cory Booker. Cory Booker is the kind of man who Strom Thurmond would consider unworthy to shine his shoes. He would use all the epitaphs that we use for African-Americans in private – and in his state in South Carolina he would have said them in public. The idea of a man like Booker serving in the U.S. Senate would have been abhorrent to him when Thurmond was young and was, no doubt thankfully to him, something he barely had to endure in all his years in public service. Thurmond died in 2003, one year before a young man named Barack Obama would become the first Democrat African-American to be elected to the Senate.

Booker was elected as Mayor of Newark and would run for the U.S. Senate to fill the vacant seat by Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey in 2013. He would win election in his own right in 2014, one of the few Democrats to hold that his seat in a bad year for the party. He would attempt a run for President in 2020, something else that Thurmond was not thrilled with while it was happening in his lifetime and is likely not happy that in his own state of South Carolina, a ‘Negro’ holds the seat he once held. Say what you will about Tim Scott but Thurmond would have never eaten dinner with him.

Booker will now be in the Senate until 2026 at which point he will have served longer in the Senate than any African-American in the history of the body. Never mind it’s ‘only fourteen years’; the previous record was held by Edward Brooke of Massachusetts and he lost reelection for his third term in 1978. The wheels of progress move slowly but they do move.

And now consider what Booker finished accomplishing tonight. He has spoken for 25 hours and 30 minutes about the problems facing America led by a party that Thurmond did everything in his power to help mold in his image and is led by a President who I know he would have great respect for in every way. He has defeated a record in the august body of the Senate that was made by a man who hated everything America was becoming and was determined to stand in the way of. Strom Thurmond represents everything that is abhorrent to me as an American and that he was admired and respected by so many in that institution personally disgusts me in every way possible. He represents the most odious and loathsome aspects of our humanity.

So in a sense I could care less about what Booker actually said during those 25 hours but rather who and where he made it. For the first half of the nineteenth century the Senate spent as much time as possible trying to paper over the problem of slavery. When it was abolished, they made a token effort to fight for the rights of African-Americans and then left them on their own, largely because men like Thurmond were the rule in both parties of Congress when it came to black men. Thurmond was no worse than his predecessors from South Carolina even in the 20th century but by the time he came to Washington the tide was irrevocably beginning to turn towards equality and he chose to keep the South as close to antebellum and was the representative of all that is the worst aspects of our political system. His ‘record’ in the Senate is not a dubious one but a disgraceful one.

Like so many people I have had trouble finding reasons for hope the last several months. I have argued for optimism even in the face of the dark forces that Thurmond represented and still are held too in to much of the country but I have found little concrete things to hold on to. And now Cory Booker has taken one of the more disgusting hallmarks of the Senate and turned it into a footnote. That was one of the biggest legacies Thurmond had in the Senate. And now its gone. Forever. His mark has been erased by a man who represents everything that Thurmond hated in life and is still idolized by too many.

Those on the far right will try to argue its irrelevant. Those on the far left will argue the same thing but for different reasons. But neither side will be able to erase it from the pages of history. An African-American senator has taken something away from Strom Thurmond forever. And that makes me proud. To be a Democrat, to be an American, and as a member of the human race.

Cling to that when times are dark.