As I mentioned in an article last
year, I learned far too late that there was yet another award recognizing the
best in television: the Television Critics Awards. I was flattened to realize
they’d existed for thirty-five years before, and much like Sam Beckett in Quantum Leap, they had spent that time
putting right what so often the Emmys does wrong, and recognizing some of the
greatest series in TV history. A partial glimpse of their past winners include Sports Night, Homicide, The Good Wife, and
most recently, The Americans (three
times!). They’ve also recognized some actors the Emmys kept ignoring, such as
Michael C. Hall, Ian McShane and Rachel Bloom. Not bad for an institution that
only has one category for nominated actors in both comedy and drama.
So this year, I decided to try and
take a look at the Critics Awards before the Emmy Nods came out to see if
they’d give additional clarity. Imagine my joy when I went to their website,
and learned what should have been obvious: they give out nominations before
they choose their awards.
Obviously, I will be spending the
next few weeks trying to track down their nomination process and see what other
great series and actors they consider. But for now, I’m going to focus on the
series and actors they chose to nominate in the major categories for this year. And unlike the Emmys, I
actually like most of the nominees
INDIVIDUAL ACHIEVEMENT IN DRAMA
Should I be angry that actors in
Limited Series are competing against actors in dramas? Should I be angry that
both actors and actresses are competing in all categories? Perhaps. But when
the talent includes Amy Adams, Patricia Arquette, and Christine Baranski for
the Limited series, and Jodie Comer, Billy Porter and Christine Baranski for
the other, can one really quibble? I might argue that if they separated for
Limited series, they might find room for Sam Rockwell, Benicio Del Toro and Bob
Odenkirk, but Hell. I think I’ll give them discretion. Considering that all of
these actors will be in the forefront of the categories, I can’t complain.
INDIVIDUAL ACHIEVEMENT IN COMEDY
Apart from the ubiquitous presence
of Julia-Louis Dreyfus – she’s won quite enough awards in the past decade,
thank you – everyone else is a good choice. Bill Hader and Pamela Adlon are
both superb, and having seen the first couple of episodes of Russian Doll, I’m inclined to give
Natasha Lyonne a green light. Phoebe Waller-Bridge has spent the last couple of
years becoming a force in British television, so its fitting she gets a nod for
her last chance for Fleabag. Would I
have liked to see Eugene Levy nominated? But Catherine O’Hara’s a national
treasure. Would be nice to have seen Jim Carrey or Issa Rae, but these are good
choices.
OUTSTANDING ACHIEVEMENT IN MOVIE OR MINISERIES
No one can argue with Chernobyl , Deadwood: The Movie, Escape at Dannemora,
Fosse/Verdon or Sharp Objects. Certainly
not me. I’m not as certain about When
They See Us – I’d have preferred to see maybe A Very English Scandal – but this is a good group, and a fine
measure of the great limited series that came this year.
OUTSTANDING ACHIEVEMENT IN DRAMA
The critical difference. No Game of Thrones. And this is an
organization that recognized in the past. Better
Call Saul, Killing Eve, The Good Fight, Homecoming and Pose are all superb examples of what television is capable of, and
all have excellent chances to be in the fight. I’m a little less certain about Succession, but the buzz for it has been
building over the last year. All in all, this is a good bunch.
OUTSTANDING ACHIEVEMENT IN COMEDY
And they’re willing to go to seven
nominations. Well done. Barry, The Good Place , The
Marvelous Mrs. Maisel, and Fleabag are
all worthy. I’m inclined to give a similar pass to Russian Doll after I see a few more episodes. Schitt’s Creek has more than earned its spot here. I’m a little
mixed on Veep’s presence, but given
how exceptional the finale was, it would have been hard to ignore it.
OUTSTANDING ACHIEVEMENT IN SKETCH/VARIERTY SHOWS
What do you know? Some variety!
Stephen Colbert and John Oliver are here. But so is Samantha Bee. And Seth
Meyers (yeah!) And Desus and Mero (double yeah!) I don’t know if “I Think You
Should Leave” is as good as say, Random
Acts of Flyness or Tracey Ullman, but then again, HBO has enough
recognition already.
I’ll
pass on Outstanding New Program because I didn’t actually see most of
them/.
PROGRAM OF THE YEAR
Here’s my only real nit to pick. If
Game of Thrones isn’t good enough to
be considering the Outstanding Drama of the year, why is it okay for Program of
the Year? This may be the only real category where the Critics seem to be
considering that this might be a popularity contest. Which is odd, because none
of the other nominees – Chernobyl,
Fleabag, Russian Doll, Pose, and When
They See Us – fit in that kind of way. And they all have multiple
nominations. Game of Thrones does
not. I don’t think the Critics will pick this way – but I think by putting it
here, they are hedging their bets. And that’s unfortunate. You’re critics, not
the People’s Choice Awards.
All in all, though, the nominations
here make be proud to be in the profession I’m in. I guess its true what they
say about great minds. I’ll try and check the Peabodys later.
No comments:
Post a Comment