This
episode, to put it mildly, has a divisive reputation among fans and even some
historians of Lost. In the
first volume of Finding Lost, Nikki
Stafford put it rather bluntly that she considered it by far the worst episode
of the first two seasons. Considering that were very few episodes in the entire
series that she hated outright, that says a lot about her opinions towards it.
By contrast in the second edition of Lost’s Hidden
Treasures another compendium about the series, at least one
fan of the show thought that this was one of the ten best episodes in the first
four seasons of the series.
I
myself am divided on it. I’ve never regarded it very highly either at the time
or years after the fact. And don’t get me wrong: it’s never going to be at the
top of my list of some of the great episodes of Season 2. At the end of the day
I think it’s just another in a long stream of episodes that started with The
Hunting Party where the series either seems to be running in place, showing
regulars acting deeply out of characters, and dealing with storylines that are
ultimately pointless for the series. That all being said, I don’t think its as
terrible as critics like Stafford seem to have thought it was at the time and
compared to some of the other episodes in Season 2, it’s actually far more
ambitious than some of the other ones.
I think
that part of the reason that this episode has such a bad reputation is because
of how it portrays Charlie. Charlie was an early fan favorite in Season 1 who
many people very quickly grew to love because of his struggles, his
relationship with Claire and how much of an everyman he seemed to be on the
island. Since the beginning of Season 2, however, Charlie’s been heading in a
bad direction. He’s been treating people unfairly, he seems both overprotective
of Claire and Aaron, and yet is judgmental of her, and he seems inexplicably
jealous of Locke’s involvement with the two of them. Two episodes ago, Claire
learned that he was carrying statues with heroin in them, and understandably
she was horrified. Charlie’s been stewing for the last couple of episodes and
now it all seems to come to a head.
There’s
also the timing of this episode which might have hurt people’s opinion of it:
we had this big confrontation with the Others the previous episode and it ended
with Jack suggesting to train an army. Now all of that has been dropped and we
seem to be going backwards on an episode involving Aaron, who seemed vitally
important in the Season 1 finale and, since the hatch was opened, pretty much
seems to have been forgotten. (Sad to say, this is fundamentally a larger
problem the series will have with both Aaron and his mother for the rest of the
series.)
But on
this rewatch, particularly coming after the incredibly messy and overblown The
Hunting Party, I actually think that it holds up far better. It’s a lot closer,
in fact, to many of the episodes that we got in Season 1 which suggested that
there was something deeper to the presence of the characters on the island. I
think the real reason some of us rejected it at the time may have been actually
voiced by Charlie himself to Locke. Charlie has been accused of having a mean
streak this season and it will certainly become more apparent in the next few
episodes, but when he expresses his frustrations to Locke it’s clear this isn’t
one of them. Kate did see a
horse just two episodes ago and several other people – including Locke – have had some kind of
hallucinatory experience in the jungle. Yet when Charlie goes through the exact
same thing, everyone suspects he’s on drugs. That Locke himself takes this
position is extremely hypocritical considering that he himself had a bizarre
dream that led him to the Beechcraft.
And
it’s interesting to contrast Charlie’s dreams with some of the others we’ve
seen so far. Locke’s have fundamentally been a combination of his past and the
future, and in a sense that’s what we get in Charlie’s first dream where he’s
opening presents on Christmas morning and keeps having visions of the pressure
his own family put on him. This is the only picture we get of his mother Megan,
and it’s possible he’s projecting here. That said, based on the image we get of
his father, it’s pretty obvious that he never approved of either he or Liam’s
dreams, and that had to be just as much of a burden.
The
second dream is perhaps the most striking we will see in the entire series.
Many of the dreams and vision we will see on the show will have a spiritual
quality but Charlie’s is the only one where religion is the most directly
invoked. The image of his mother and Claire together is that of a Renaissance
painting and the fact that he hears the sound of a dove crying - an image that Eko will reference near the end
of the episode – clearly indicates a far more religious faith than anyone we’ve
met on this series other than Eko.
The bigger
problem with the story is, as with everything involving Aaron, it is
unimportant in the scope of the series and it seems to make Charlie look
deranged or on drugs. We will never know for certain if Charlie was using
during this episode (I myself don’t think so) but Charlie himself is willing to
at least consider the possibility he’s going mad.
I think
it is telling that Charlie goes to Eko after he sees Locke; Charlie has a habit
of being drawn to men of faith on the island, and they’ve already bonded over
the trip to the Beechcraft. And Eko is the only person who does not dismiss
what Charlie has seen or heard as a sign of insanity but rather as the
possibility that the island is telling him that he does have to save Aaron.
The
problem is Charlie does what he has done so much of the time on the series and
immediately try to act on it. Had he been willing to listen to Locke when he
said that he needed to give Claire some time, she might very well have come
around on her own – she does at the end of the episode even after everything
that happens. But as we’ve seen repeatedly Charlie has never had the best
impulse control, whether he’s on drugs or not – he clearly demonstrated that
when Rousseau took Aaron and now he’s showing that’s it’s gotten no better.
Some
have argued that Locke’s attitude towards Charlie is also out of character,
both in his rude behavior towards his former charge and the fact he chooses to
hit Charlie repeated at the climax of the episode. However, I wonder if in
Locke’s case he too is dealing with the repercussions of the previous episode.
When he chose to train Michael to shoot he must have known the implications.
Jack spent much of the last episode tearing John down to the point, he actually
blew up at him before the Others showed up. And it must have been as big a blow
to him as it was to Jack and Sawyer to be forced to disarm and retreat at the
end of the confrontation. Perhaps this is where Locke’s crisis of faith truly
begins: when Charlie tries to get him to talk about how the island tested him,
Locke talks as someone whose faith is diminished. This is made clear when
Claire asks him about baptism and he dismisses it as ‘spiritual insurance’ Yes
the fact that Charlie has lied to him about the statues no doubt hurts a lot
too… but remember that one of the last shots of the episode is of him putting
them in the safe. He knows how dangerous they can be but he never gives a real
explanation why he never destroys them. Perhaps he has not truly given up on
Charlie.
There
are also other aspects of this episode I find far more appealing than what we
got in the last one. Hurley is clearly crushing on Libby and when he confesses
it in front of Sawyer and Kate, Sawyer teases him but not in the mean-spirited
way he has so far. Indeed, in a truly wonderful scene, he acts as Hugo’s
wingman, because he clearly knows Hurley will never be able to act on his own.
Similarly the scene between Hurley and Libby is equally cute and charming.
In
retrospect I find the scene between Jack and Ana Lucia on that same level. Ana
Lucia is making more of an effort than she has in a while to engage with
someone, and when she asks Jack “You hitting that?” it’s the first time she’s
seemed normal since we’ve met her. (Jack’s clearly floored by that, mainly because
she’s hit a nerve.) If there’d been more scenes like this, we could have really
grown to like Ana Lucia.
Many
also say that the flashback in this episode doesn’t really tell us anything
knew about Charlie and Liam that we didn’t know before. I’d argue it clearly
tells us more than we thought. Throughout the flashbacks Liam is clearly on the
verge of barely being able to stand up straight or last a minute without a fix.
Then in the last flashback he truly and utterly abandons the brother who got
hooked on drugs because he couldn’t stand to see Liam broken and maybe wanted
to get closer to him. This makes the flashback we see in Homecoming more
painful because we now know just how Charlie got to the point we saw him in,
and how utterly addicted to both fame and drugs he was to swallow his pride and
go to Australia to see the brother who’d betrayed him so many times and did so
one last one. Throw this in with how Charlie covers for his brother with Karen
when Liam isn’t there to see his daughter born and how he sells the band’s soul
to try and get them money for Liam and it’s impossible not to feel immensely
for Charlie. Several flashbacks for other characters in the series the rest of
the way will tell stories that seem superfluous. This one doesn’t.
And the
final scenes tell us even more about what the long term plans for Eko must have
been. When Claire went to talk to Locke about baptism, he basically brushed her
off. When Claire goes to Eko with those same doubts, Eko uses the parable of
John the Baptist and Christ to say that there is more to it than that. When
Claire says she afraid what will happen to her if she isn’t baptized and
something happens to her, Eko assuages her by baptizing both of them. It’s very
symbolic that the last theme music we hear in the episode is one that we
already recognize with Eko, because unlike both Charlie and Locke, whose faith
has been lost, Eko still has his and now shared it with Claire. Of course as
fans of the show know, Claire does that have a reason to think something might
happen to her, but it’s more related to Earth than heaven.
So no,
Fire + Water is not one of the great episodes of Lost, and it may not have delivered on the
promise at its center anymore than some of the others this season. But I don’t think it’s a horrible one, either. We
may not have liked it because of what we saw some of our favorite characters
becoming, but I don’t think we gave it a fair shake. Many people were upset at
how Locke behaved throughout Season 2, but it was pretty clear he was going
through a crisis of faith. Why should we give so much grief to Charlie, a man
who clearly had faith before he came to the island and was now going through a
similar crisis?
No comments:
Post a Comment