Over the next several
years I began to slowly but surely study
the history of Jeopardy in a more regular fashion. In what was a pattern for
me, I did so in a slip-shod fashion more or less stumbling in to it.
Around 2005 the Jeopardy
archive, a website in which a devoted band of writers have been detailing the
history of every Jeopardy game ever played, began to put up its first entries
online. Because I resisted the internet far too much well into my twenties I
didn’t become aware of its existence until 2010. No, that’s not true. I found
records of games relating to the Ultimate Tournament of Champions on Wikipedia,
but it took me another two years to realize that they were linking to a
separate archive. And it took me another five years to start using the
site to its full potential. It has been a reliable resource for me ever since
but it took a long time for me to realize it.
I was also trying to
track down old Jeopardy games on the Internet, which is how I found out that
YouTube existed. (Don’t judge me.) The internet has never been entirely helpful
when it comes to tracking down old Jeopardy games: there have been licensing
issues that have never let them stay up for long, nor has streaming been
willing until fairly recently to fill in the gaps. For much of the 2000s, the
main source that I had for Jeopardy was cable channels like the Game Show
Network and by this time in my life, I had a job and was rarely at home to see
these games. (Ah how life gets in the way.)
Around this same time,
Channel 55 more or less stopped broadcasting Jeopardy and only ABC was showing
it. At this point our home did not have
a DVR and even if we had, I doubt I would have had the wherewithal to use it:
it took me until 2007 to learn how to successfully program a VCR. (Talk about coming late to the party.) By this
point Jeopardy was slightly less important to me and watching every
episode no longer matter at much.
The sole exception would
be in regards to the annual Tournament of Champions, which I made every effort to
either watch or record every episode. During this period it increasingly became
clear that while you might be able to stay on the show until you were beaten,
there was still no guarantee that you could win a Tournament of Champions. This
became clear in the first after Jennings’ run in 2006 in one of the biggest
examples of that.
In a weird quirk of fate
the player who would have the second-longest run after Jennings made his debut
on Jeopardy less than two months after Jennings had been defeated in the Ultimate
Tournament of Champions. David Madden, Madden was barely out of college when he
debuted on Jeopardy on July 5, 2005. He was never as dominant as Jennings was
during his run, even though he ran away with his first seven games. But he was very good. He managed to win
nineteen consecutive games and just over $430,000 before he was defeating in
early September of 2005. I naturally
assumed he would cruise to victory in the Tournament of Champions. Not only did
he not win, but he did also not even make it to the finals and in fact he was
thrashed in his semi-final loss to Bill MacDonald who had won four games. That
year’s winner was Michael Falk, who is to date the only three-game
winner of a Tournament of Champions.
No one would get
remotely close to double digits in victories for the next nine years. (I’ll get
to one of the contestants later in this entry.) Indeed, in the nearly nine
years following Madden’s defeat, only two players – Dan Pawson and Jason Keller
– would win as many as nine games. And
very few players would even manage to win as much $200,000 over the next
several years as well. Jennings’ record not only looked remarkable it really
seemed like well live the rest of my life before anybody even came close to
getting near double digits.
This didn’t mean there
weren’t interesting and brilliant players over the interim, however. In 2008
Larissa Kelly became the first female contestant to win more than five games:
she won six and $222,597. When she finished second to Dan Pawson in the 2009 Tournament
of Champions, she set the benchmark for money won by a female contestant.
At the start of the
2010-2011 season, a graduate student
named Roger Craig did something no one would have thought possible and broke
Ken Jennings one-day record when he managed to win $77,000. Roger’s approach
was the opposite of Jennings’: he would check the bottom of the board first,
hunting for the Daily Double and when he found it, would bet everything he had
whether he was in the lead or not. For the first time, Alex actually compared
someone else to Ken. Roger’s initial run was short compared to the super-champions
of today – he won $230,200 in six games – but he was so dominant I was certain
he would the next Tournament of Champions. I held fast to that opinion even when
Tom Nissley won eight games and $235,405. In this rare case, my faith was
rewarded: Roger romped to victory in the 2011 Tournament of Champions and took
home $250,000.
Another very impressive
win was managed by Colby Burnett. In 2011, perhaps in acknowledgement of how
many successful champions on the show were teachers, Jeopardy aired its first
ever Teachers Tournament. In November of 2012 Colby Burnett, a high school
world history teacher from Chicago, won the Tournament $100,000. Less than four
months later, he managed an impressive string of victories to win that year’s
the 2013 Tournament of Champions.
All of these players and
many more made their impression but I still wondered if and when Jeopardy would
try another Tournament similar to the UTC. In 2011 Ken Jennings and Brad Rutter
had faced off against IBM’s Watson in what was considered a major event, but I
barely paid it any mind, thinking that it was little more than a promotional
exercise than anything else. Colby Burnett’s triumphs had taken place in Season
29. Jeopardy had aired a special
tournament in its tenth season and the UTC had more or less been an
acknowledgement of the 20th. I believed if the past was prologue,
Season 30 would have a similar one. My hunch was proven correct.
The Battle of the
Decades is in my opinion the best event tournament that Jeopardy has held in
nearly forty years. Every element of it, from the choices of the participants
to how the Tournament ended up being played, to the quality of the games
themselves, were nearly perfect all the way through. Alex said as much at the
end of the last match and his opinion should count for something.
The breakdown, compared
to the Ultimate Tournament of Champions, was far simpler. Fifteen players from
each ten year period of the show’s run would play off in five matches in the
course of a week. The winners would face off in a traditional tournament
format: each quarterfinal match would feature one representative from each
decade to play against each other. This would lead to five winners and four
wild card spots and so on from there, with the eventual winner receiving one
million dollars.
Even though the calendar
did not work out exactly: the players invited back were classified as
representing the 1980s, the 1990s and the 2000s. Fourteen players were extended
invitations and the fans would vote on the last player out of a field of five.
That part may have been the only wrinkle of the tournament I objected to, not
so much as the idea of it but because of the five players that were to be voted
on. I will get to that reasoning as I go through the representatives. Other
than that, I think few fans of the show – myself among them – could object to
almost all of the players invited. There are a couple of exceptions I’ll get
too with each decade.
The 1980s, which
technically represented 1984-1993 invited every living winner of a Tournament
of Champions back. Jerry Frankel, who won the first Tournament of Champions in
1985, had tragically passed away two years after his victory. Bob Blake, the
winner of the 1990 Tournament of Champions, was touring and declined his
invitation. The other seven returned.
Also invited were four
players who had participated in many of the special tournaments in the interim:
Leslie Frates and Frank Spangenberg have been in every previous
super-tournament, India Cooper had been invited to the last two, and Leslie
Shannon, who had been one of the more notable absentees from the UTC was
invited back. Jerome Vered was invited due to his finish in the UTC. Phoebe Juel,
the College Champion of 1993 was somewhat questionable but she’d been a
semi-finalist in the 1993 Tournament of Champions and played respectively in
the UTC.
The only player whose
presence I questioned was someone I considered a political invitee. In April of
1987 Richard Cordray had won over $40,000 in five games and had been a
semi-finalist in the 1987 Tournament of Champions. He had not participated in a
tournament since. Why was he invited back? Those of you who know politics might
know that in 2012 to head the Consumer Financial Bureau. Before that he had served as Treasurer of the
State of Ohio and eventually attorney general; he would later make a run for
Governor before losing to Mike DeWine. Which I supposed is nice, but I would
rather have seen Eric Newhouse invited back instead.
The choice of fan
favorite bothered me as well. While I knew little of the five players listed as
fan favorite before their original appearance, I fundamentally knew enough of
them during their runs as the UTC to know that Andrew Westney, who had won the
Teen Tournament in 1989, was my fifth choice. Later when I learned the history
of all of these players (I won’t go into it here) Westney’s selection was even
more inexplicable. Yet he ended up getting voted on by the fans.
I had less trouble with
the selections from the 1990s (1994-2003). All nine winners of the Tournament
of Champions, including Brad Rutter of course, were invited back. Pam Mueller,
no doubt because of her appearance in the UTC, was extended an invitation, as
were four participants from the Million Dollar Masters, among them Claudia
Perry who had been ineligible for the UTC. I questioned the appearance of Jill Bunzendahl
Chimka who I had no memory of her original appearance and had not seen her in
the UTC. I would later learn that in four games she had won $85,099 which at the time was the most money a female
contestant had won. While I might have been able to come up with some
alternates from the UTC, Jill’s choice was a valid one. And while Shane Whitlock
was not necessarily my first choice as a fan favorite, his track record as both
a College Champion and in the UTC (he had made it into the quarterfinals before
he had been defeated in Final Jeopardy) was a more than valid choice.
The group from the 2000s:
(2004-2013) were mostly a good group though there were some issues. The seven
winners of Tournaments of Champions were invited back as well as Ken Jennings.
Three of the female invitees had been selected for setting marks for female
contestants: Larissa Kelly, who I mentioned earlier; Stephanie Jass, who with
seven victories was at the time the record-holder for most wins by a female
contestant and Maria Wenglisnky, who in the fall of 2005 had become the first
female contestant to crack the $100,000 mark. Another player, Vinita Kailasanath,
a College Champion who had participated in the 2004 Tournament of Champions,
had an impressive record in both that Tournament and the UTC.
Two of the remaining
invitees may have been chosen because David Madden was not participating. (Alex
said that there was some kind of conflict of interest that made him feel he
could not participate. This would not be a permanent situation.) That may have
been why Tom Kavanaugh, who had won eight games that same season, may have been
selected in his place. The player whose presence I questioned the most in
hindsight was Keith Whitener who had won seven games and finished second in the
2013 Tournament of Champions. He was a good player but compared to Jason
Keller, who had won nine games and more than $212,000 (he’d won nearly as much
as Keith in only six games) I think he was a poor choice. Compared to Tom
Nissley, who ended up having to be voted on as a fan favorite, he was a poor
choice as well.
That all said, I did not
know nearly as much about this group going into the Battle of the Decades. Many
of them I remembered very clearly and I was inclined to take Jeopardy at
their word when it came to their greatness.
Unlike all prior
tournaments in the show’s history, the Battle of the Decades was spread out in
a drip-drip-drip fashion. The 1980s round took place in February, The 1990s in
March, The 2000s in April and the final two weeks played out in May. In many
ways this was an interesting approach as it help anticipation for the finals
build more and more with each week.
All of the matches in
the first round were superb, with only two runaway games. It should not come as
a huge shock that Ken Jennings one his first match in the tournament in a round
but Brad’s initial win in the first round only became a rout when he got the
last clue in Double Jeopardy correct to lock up the game. This was vital
because his closest opponent Mike Dupee knew the correct response to Final
Jeopardy and Brad didn’t. He knew how lucky he was at the end of it.
Unlike the UTC, the
Battle of the Decades was a great tournament because the cream rose to the top
more easily than it had. With two exceptions, all thirteen winners of the first
Round had previously won a Tournament of Champions and the fourteenth was Ken
Jennings. Besides Jennings, who
basically routed Michael Falk and Vinita Kailasanath, the other fourteen were
closely fought from beginning to end with the lead frequently changing
throughout both rounds. I’m still not sure even now which first round group was
the best of the three, but I am inclined to lean towards the group from the
first decade. Maybe it was merely I had
the hardest time competing against them and the easiest against the group from
the 2000s but I think there’s something more solid than that. All of the Final
Jeopardy clues in every match were incredibly difficult and there was a
fair amount of struggling throughout. But in the first round, the group from
the 1980s got the most correct Final Jeopardy responses than the other two: the
fifteen players gave a total of eight correct responses, while the group from
the 1990s gave only five and the group from the 2000s gave just four. That did
not mean that collectively one group was smarter than the other as you’ll see.
The winners from the
1980s featured some of the early greats in Jeopardy history: Chuck Forrest,
Mark Lowenthal (who had collaborated on a book about Jeopardy after the
original appearances) Leszek Pawlowicz, Tom Cubbage and Tom Nosek who I
mentioned in the very first entry. Since none of them had gotten past the first
round of the UTC (Forest had earned a bye but had lost his second round match)
it was a particularly impressive showing by the ‘Seniors’.
The 1990s group gave a
similarly strong showing, this time with Robin Carroll and Rachael Schwartz,
who to this point had never got the first part of any tournament they’d been
invited back for, coming from behind in each game to win. Brad Rutter, as I
mentioned prevailed as did Mark Dawson, who had won the 2003 Tournament of
Champions and was the first player to win a $250,000 as a result. The fifth
winner, who I had been rooted for but was not sure she could succeed, was Pam
Mueller.
Pam had previously
proven her worth against great players before but not like this: her opponents
in the first round were Ryan Holznagel, who’d won the 1995 Tournament of
Champions and Dan Melia, who’d won the 1998 Tournament of Champions. In
addition, both men had performed very well in the UTC, though not nearly as
well as Pam. But thanks in part to the sweeping the category AS ‘IF’ in Double
Jeopardy, Pam went into Final Jeopardy with a lead.
The category was
BORDERS: “Twice as long as Hadrian’s Wall, Offa’s Dyke was the traditional
border between these 2 lands.” Dan was on this one, as Alex said, “like a shot:
“What are England and Wales?” Unfortunately he did not have as much money as he
wanted: he had just $5700 and went up to $19,700. Ryan thought it was The
Netherlands and Germany but his small wager kept him ahead of Dan. Pam had
$17,000. She wrote down: “What are Scotland and Wales?” but she bet nothing and
ended up with a brilliant victory.
I knew a bit less about
the competitors in the 2000s than the other two groups but there was one player
I thought had the best chance of making it to the finals even before it
started: Roger Craig. I figured his track record was good enough to get him. He
struggled a little in his first round match against Vijay Balse and Stephanie
Jass but moved into the lead early in Double Jeopardy and managed to keep it.
He didn’t quite run away with the game, but he was in great shape at the end.
The fact he got Final Jeopardy was enough to make me think he could go the
distance.
In addition to Roger and
Ken, the three other winners won in implausible fashion. Colby Burnett had the
thinnest of margins over Celeste DiNucci (winner of the 2007 Tournament of
Champions) going into Final Jeopardy: he had $16,400 and she had $16,200. It
came down fundamentally to wagers more than anything else. Colby had bet just
enough money for him to win only if Celeste responded incorrectly. And
he was so stunned it worked out at the end, Could would drop his head on the
podium when it was over.
The third match would
feature a battle between Tom Kavanaugh, Russ Schumacher and Larissa Kelly.
Larissa dominated the match from the start of the Jeopardy round and almost to
the end of Double Jeopardy. Until the penultimate clue she had a runaway game.
Russ found the Daily Double on WOMEN ON
U.S. STAMPS. He had $10,400 to Larissa’s $22,800: “1n 2005, for what
would have been her 100th birthday, the U.S. and Sweden issued
stamps featuring this movie legend.” Russ knew it was Greta Garbo and gained
$5000. He now had enough money to stop her from winning outright.
It came down to Final
Jeopardy. The category was MONARCHS. “In 2005 the Kul Sharif Mosque of Tatarstan
was reopened 453 years after it was destroyed by this man.” On a blind guess I
somehow came up with the correct answer: “Who is Ivan the Terrible?” Russ wrote
down Constantine but lost nothing. Larissa wrote down Suleiman and would lose
$8001. This dropped her to $14,799 and gave Russ an improbable come from behind
victory.
The final match of Round
1 was between Dan Pawson, Maria Wenglinsky and Keith Whitener. Dan got off to a
decent start but there were some tough questions here in the Jeopardy round,
particularly in the category COMPUTER ABBREVIATIONS. As a result Dan had a small lead with $4700
to Maria’s $2200 and Keith’s $1800.
In Double Jeopardy Dan
managed to pull to a substantial lead but Maria caught him late in the round on
the second Daily Double. She pulled ahead of him in the last bit and lead with
$18,100 to Dan’s $15,700. Keith was still in contention with $4200.
The Final Jeopardy clue
was one of the toughest in the entire tournament. The category was 20th
CENTURY NOVEL QUOTES: “It was one of those pictures…so contrived that the eyes
follow you...beneath” the picture was this 5-word quotes. None of the
contestants (or me) knew the quote was from 1984 and the quotation was
“Big Brother is watching you.” Once again, it came down to wagers. Dan lost
only $3000 and when Maria wagered $15,000, Dan managed a comeback victory.
The quarterfinal matches
were not at the level of the first round battles but they all did have their
own moments of suspense. In them, the decade that had the most success were
those who competed in the 2000s with Roger Craig, Russ Schumacher and Ken
Jennings all winning their quarterfinals. All had different kinds of wins: Ken
led throughout but did not pull away until he found the second Daily Double in
Double Jeopardy; Roger was in third at the end of the Jeopardy round of his game
and did not move into the lead until he got both Daily Doubles correct in
Double Jeopardy and Russ Schumacher spent much of the game trailing his
contenders Pam Mueller and Tom Nosek.
Ken’s rout was
impressive because it came against two former Tournament of Champions winners:
Tom Cubbage from the 1980s and Rachael Schwartz from the 1990s. Tom ended up
qualifying for a wild card spot. Roger enjoyed a similar triumph over Robin
Carroll and Leszek Pawlowicz; Leszek also qualified for a wild card.
Russ’ win was especially
notable because the Jeopardy round was more or less dominated by Tom Nosek. Tom
would fade somewhat in Double Jeopardy but Pam, in her second consecutive
match, showed great strength against two Tournament of Champions winners. She would leap to a large lead when she found
the first Daily Double in Double Jeopardy and add $5000 to her score. She would not have the same luck on the second
Daily Double, this time in YUCKY HISTORY:
“As in the Western
“Flesh & the Spur”, Indians used staking people to these as a torture – or
at least white settler said so.” Pam thought it was horses when it was actually
anthills. It cost her $3000. She still maintained her lead and at the end of
Double Jeopardy it was a very close match: Pam had $17,400, Russ $15,400, and
Tom had a more than respectable $11,200.
The category for Final
Jeopardy was the deceptively easy sounding U.S. STATES. The clue wasn’t:
“Between 2006 & 2013 it went from 39th to 6th in per
capita income and its unemployment rate dropped to the nation’s lowest.” Russ
was the only one who knew the correct answer: “What is North Dakota?” (As Alex
said, it was because of an oil and gas boom.) Russ wagered only $1300. Tom
wrote down Texas and lost $8800. Pam thought it was Washington and would lose
$2602. Pam would have enough to qualify as a semi-finalist in the wild cards;
she ended up being the only female competitor.
Brad more or less romped
to victory against Dan Pawson and Mark Lowenthal after a huge wager on a Daily
Double in READ ‘ING’ . He had $32,400 by the end of the round and the fact that
he (nor anyone else) knew Final Jeopardy was irrelevant.
The last quarterfinal
match was the most closely fought. Chuck Forrest would go into the lead early
in the game and while Mark Dawson and Colby Burnett kept creeping on him, they
never caught him. This did not make the game any less exciting. Colby made a
spectacular recovery in Double Jeopardy and managed to go from just $200 at the
end of the Jeopardy round to $11,800 at the end of Double Jeopardy. But it was
a pretty even fight: Chuck had $14,400 to Colby’s $11,800 while Mark trailed
with $10,600.
The Final Jeopardy was
another tough one in FAMOUS BOOKS: “It was published March 26, 1830; a very
popular work with the same name premiered March 24, 2011.” All three players
struggled with this and only Colby came up with a response: “What is the Time
Machine?” It was actually The Book of Mormon. Fortunately for all three
players, nobody lost much. Mark lost $2000, Colby $800, Chuck $2500. Chuck had
enough to become an automatic semi-finalist; Colby’s score was high enough for
a wild-card.
The first semi-final
match was essentially a meeting for the ages as Chuck Forrest would express his
admiration for the ability of Ken Jennings while Jennings told Alex how Forrest
had been an inspiration for him growing up.
In the Jeopardy round Jennings totally outdid the old master as well as
Russ Schumacher. He had amassed $15,000
to Chuck’s $2800 and Russ’ $800 by the end of the Jeopardy round. It looked
like he was about to have his biggest runaway yet.
Then early in Double
Jeopardy Chuck demonstrated that the old dog was capable of new tricks when he
found the first Daily Double in 4-SYLLABLE WORDS:
Chuck: “I never got a
chance to say this before, but let’s make it a true Daily Double.”
“Adjective for the
perfect embodiment of something, or something a Dionne kid must have.”
Chuck knew the answer:
“What is a quintessential?”
He doubled his score to
$9600.
Then a few moments later
Ken would lose $6000 on a Daily Double. As the round continued, for the
briefest of moments, the master had the student by the lapels. But Ken got the
last four correct responses and time ran out with four clues left. Still Ken’s
lead was nowhere near insurmountable: he had $18,600 to Chuck’s $15,200.
Final Jeopardy told the
tale. The category was 19th CENTURY POEMS. “Written about the U.S.
occupation of the Philippines, a Kipling poem said, ‘Take up’ this now
controversial phrase.” Chuck knew the correct answer: “What is the white man’s
burden?” He gained $11,000. Ken also knew it and had wagered $11,801. In his
three wins, Ken had defeated five prior winners of a Tournament of Champions.
More than anything else, this convinced me he was the greatest of all time.
Brad Rutter had no
trouble against Leszek or Tom Cubbage in his semi-final, getting an
insurmountable lead early in the Jeopardy round and never even being remotely
threatened by either of these great players.
He finished Double Jeopardy with $32,800, nearly five times Tom his
nearest opponents total. He walked to his spot in the finals.
I had assumed going into
the semi-finals that both Ken and Brad would easily make it to the finals. The
last semi-final match featured three fairly evenly matched players: Colby
Burnett, Pam Mueller and Roger Craig and I honestly didn’t know who would come
out on top. This match was by far the most evenly fought, though in part it was
because Roger kept getting in his own way. He gave a whopping eight incorrect
responses in both Jeopardy and Double Jeopardy and on many occasions he’d ring
in and draw a blank. The fact that he was still in the lead at the end of the
Jeopardy round was remarkable, but it was pretty close: Chuck had $5200 to
Colby’s $3600 and Pam’s $2800.
In Double Jeopardy Pam
would find the first Daily Double on the very first clue of the round in WORLD
LITERATURE. Copying Chuck she said that she had never gotten to say this
before, but that she would make a true Daily Double. She responded correctly
and went into the lead.
Roger then got in his
own way by getting the $1600 and $2000 clues in ADVERBS IN SONG incorrect and
by he found the other Daily Double, he was now in third place with $3200. He
made fun of himself by saying: “I’ve always wanted to say this. Let’s make this
a true Daily Double. (Roger had, at this point, done so on three of the
previous four Daily Doubles he had found in his earlier wins.) The category was
PRESIDENTIAL FIRSTS:
“He was
commander-in-chief the first time the U.S. formally declared war.” He knew that
it was James Madison (the War of 1812) and moved into a tie for the lead. He
went ahead on the next clue and managed to maintain his lead for the rest of
the round. Pam dropped back a little and finished with $7200. Colby had $11,600
and Roger was ahead with $18,000.
The Final Jeopardy
category was tricky: NAMES ON THE MAP: “Visited by Jacques Cartier in 1534, it
was later named for Queen Victoria’s father, the Duke of Kent.” The clue referred to Canada, but no one came
close to the response: Prince Edward Island. Roger lost the last of his three
competitors and became the third finalist.
In the leadup to the
first game of the finals, Alex said how appropriate it was that these three men
were competing: Roger had the highest one day total, Ken had won the most
consecutive games, Brad had won the most money. And unlike the battle in the
UTC, this fight would be close all the way with multiple twists in terms and
not determined until the final clue.
I have to tell you that
I’d been competing fairly evenly in the semi-finals. I had been competitive, if
not at the level of Ken and Chuck, in the first game, had been blown out by
Brad the same as everyone else and had done respectably in the third. I did not
expect to do well in this finals but when you hear how things turned out for
me…you may have reason to doubt my reliability as a narrator. All I ask is that you trust me.
I started by sweeping
the category DOCUMENTARIES (movies have always been a strong category for me)
but I didn’t do much better for the remainder of the round. My sole comfort was
after Brad found the Daily Double in the Jeopardy round, he bet everything he
had and lost it all. Roger would move into the lead by default and he would
hold it for the rest of the round. I think I was even with Roger at the end of
the Jeopardy round with roughly $5000. I was certainly ahead of both Ken and
Brad who were at $3200 and $2000 respectively.
In Double Jeopardy Brad
immediately made things worse for himself on a $1600 clue in ELIZABETHEAN PLAYS & PLAYWRIGHTS when he mistook
Christopher Marlowe for Ben Johnson. (So did I.) All three players spent most
of their time in the first half of the round in the $1600 to $2000 clues and I
made money and bounced up and lost a bit. One clue I’m proud I got right that
Brad got wrong was one in HATE SONGS for $1200:
“While serving in the
Army during WWI, Irving Berlin was inspired to write the song: “Oh! How I Hate
to” do this. Brad guessed: “What is peel potatoes?” and everybody laughed. Ken,
like me, knew it was “Get Up in the Morning.”
I wasn’t eligible for
either Daily Double. Brad would find the first in HISTORIC DATES and get it
right. Roger found the second in MEDICAL
TERMS. At the time he had $10,200 and was in first place. He was sort of egged
on by Ken to bet everything and that’s what he did. This moment was
heartbreaking for me at home because I knew the correct response:
“Doctors use this
5-letter term for swelling or bloating in the body due to an excess build-up of
fluid.” Roger had no idea it was edema and lost everything. He took it well –
better than I would under the circumstances - but he eventually would go into the red and
would not be around for Final Jeopardy. At the time, I recall having something
like $12,600 in front of me, just ahead of Ken at $12,000 and trailing Brad
slightly at $14,000.
The Final Jeopardy
category was one of my great strengths: THE ACADEMY AWARDS. I bet
conservatively and wagered $2600. In hindsight I’m not so much surprised I knew
the answer to Final Jeopardy but that neither Brad nor Ken did. I have often
wondered if Roger knew it.
“I of the 2 movies in
the last 30 years, one a drama and one a comedy, to win Oscars for Best Actor
and Best Actress.” Ken had no idea and Brad wrote down Terms of Endearment. I
knew both: The Silence of the Lambs (which I wrote down) and As Good
as It Gets. Ken lost $5000. Brad
lost $4000. At the end of Game 1, I was ahead of both players going into the
second game.
Game 2 of the final had
some good categories for me in the Jeopardy round. THE COSTUME DESIGNS OF
WILLIAM IVEY LONG (he’s a theater composer and really this is the only place a
category based on him would show up) was a good one for me as well as
OSCAR-WINNING SONGS. I was certainly have a much better day that Brad was. At
the first break, he was at -$800 and when he found the first Daily Double he
acknowledged he didn’t have a lot to work with. He wagered $1000 and got out of
the hole. He was in a distant third with $1800 when the round ended. Ken and
Roger were very close to each other with Ken ahead with $6000 to Roger’s $5400.
The Double Jeopardy
round was déjà vu for Roger in more ways than one. He found the first Daily
Double on the fourth clue of the round and he had $10,200, exactly as much as
he’d had the last time. This time Ken pleaded with him: “Don’t do it” but he
still bet everything.
This time I had to go
along with him as I had gotten the $1600 clue correct before he’d found it in
LAKES AND RIVERS. I wasn’t as confident as Roger; I had $8000 or so, I just bet
$2000.
“Sharing the name of a
city, it’s the largest lake entirely within a Canadian province.”
I honestly don’t
remember what I guessed. Roger’s guess was more heartbreaking: “What is Lake
Manitoba?” Manitoba was the province Lake Winnipeg was in. Down he went to
nothing and he still took it well.
The second Daily Double
came up three clues later and again I was eligible. I had $8400 when Brad found
it in NONFICTION. I bet $2000 as did Brad. He did better than I did:
“The title of this essay
collection by David Sedaris refers to his attempt to learn to speak French. “ I
thought it was ME SPEAK PRETTY ONE DAY when, as Brad knew, it was Me
Talk Pretty One Day. He was at $4800.
I had some decent
moments the rest of the way – most of them in the category B.C-ING YOU, but I
also made more than my share of mistakes particularly in the category MODE OF
TRANSPORT. I thought the title of THE WORLD’S FASTEST INDIAN referred to a car and not a motorcycle. I
admit I was doing better than Roger when the round ended – he admitted that
with $2000, he was out at the end of the round – but I think had somewhere
between ten and eleven thousand dollars at the end of the round and I was
behind both Brad and Ken. Brad was in second with $11,800. Ken was ahead of
Brad with $13,600.
The decisive Final
Jeopardy category was SECRETARIES OF STATE. “Serving 160 years apart these 2
Secretaries of State are the only ones who never married.” Now I worked out
early that one of them was James Buchanan – he was Polk’s Secretary of State
and famously a bachelor President – and I did the math and guessed the other
had to be Condoleezza Rice, though I wasn’t sure of her martial status. Roger
came up with it. So did Brad and he bet nothing. Ken wrote down: “Who are
Buchanan and Albright?” His wager was irrelevant and Brad had once again
triumphed over Ken to win a million dollars. This time, he was truly astonished
at his victory.
This was the first super
tournament I had ever won. I took it modestly, considering how much these
players had ground me into the dirt throughout this tournament.
The Battle of the
Decades represented the end of one era on Jeopardy and the beginning of
another. In many ways it was a last hurrah for most of the great champions from
the first decade of the series, many of whom are now at the age when a return
to the show is unlikely. Indeed Tom Nosek and India Cooper have since passed
away. Several of the other players, such as Frank Spangenberg and Jerome Vered,
who had super in the UTC, could not get past their first round match. Of the
fifteen players who represented the 1980s, only Tom Cubbage and Chuck Forrest
are still relatively young enough that they might appear in another tournament.
As for those who represented the 1990s, there is a strong possibility that some
will return. (As we shall see in the next entry, some have already come back)
While Dan Melia, who was nearly seventy at the time of his appearance is likely
to old, some of the other players such as Rachael Schwartz and Robin Carroll
may one day return. But in a sense this tournament may very well have been the
last real link to the five game limit era.
Indeed, while the
initial rounds of the Battle of the Decades were going on, there was a sign of
a new kind of Jeopardy champion. Arthur Chu, who has since become one of the
most controversial Jeopardy players of all time, would win 11 games and $297,
200, the most won by any player since David Madden had won 19 in 2005. When his streak was over, he was third in both
games won and money won in his original appearance.
When regular play
resumed after the finals, Julia Collins would win her eleventh game having
waiting two weeks since her tenth victory. She won ten more before she finally
lost. A new breed of super-champion was coming to Jeopardy and the show would
soon reflect that.
In the final installment
in this series, I will deal with the Jeopardy All-Star Games and the new breed
of super-champions that had begun to appear before and after.
No comments:
Post a Comment