In an episode of Homicide
Tim Bayliss (Kyle Secor) and Frank Pembleton (Andre Braugher) are discussing how many times they have
delivered the news to the relatives of the recently murdered. Bayliss tells
Frank that it didn’t used to be like this. The always skeptical Pembleton asks
what he means. Bayliss says: “Back in the 1950s. You know, I Love Lucy,
Leave it to Beaver. These kind of things didn’t happen back then.”
Pembleton doesn’t even take a breath: “Any of these shows show a bunch of men
in white robes burning a cross on a lawn?” Bayliss, deadpan, says: “I don’t
remember that episode.”
So much of the
conservative movement power is built in the nostalgia factor. I don’t deny the
racist undertones, but much of it also based on the idea that change is scary
and that in the past things were better. Recent sociological studies show that
this is a belief held by many people the concept that no matter how much
evidence there is things are better and safer now, they were better before.
Many of these people surveyed consistently believe it was better before they
were born.
I don’t pretend
the world today is perfect or even very good. But I find it impossible to
believe that, voluntarily, any American would want to live thirty or
forty years ago. That so many conservative politicians in their twenties and
thirties seem to long for an era that ‘perished before they were even born’ is particularly
ironic considering how much of their rise to prominence would not have happened
without social media. Yet across the globe so many politicians who have lived
their entire lives before the 1950s constantly seem to argue that their
countries would be better if they could return to ‘the values’ of the 1950s.
Anyone who does
even a cursory history of America alone in the 1950s knows what a turbulent
time it was. There was the Red Scare, the looming threat of the Cold War, the
battle over civil rights in the South in the 1950s which increasingly were violent,
the repression of women to domestic live and the denial of the existence of
homosexuals. So why do we have this belief that the 1950s were a halcyon time?
Because of Hollywood. The fact that during same period the blacklist was in
full force and destroying the careers and lives of hundreds of people was no
doubt a partial reason that so much of the product we got, particularly on
television in the 1950s was that of wholesomeness and with no controversy at
all. That so many of the writers in that medium chafed at the restrictions put
on them by the censors apparently never made it public knowledge either: Rod
Serling essentially wrote The Twilight Zone because in a sci-fi universe
he could tell the stories he couldn’t in the real world.
So much of the
controversy against Hollywood by the right – basically as long as I have been
alive and even before – has been based on their certainty that everything was
good in the world until Hollywood started putting sex and violence in the
movies and TV. They always wanted to put them in their films and TV, they just
weren’t allowed to for a very long time. Hollywood couldn’t do it until the
ratings system was created in 1969; TV couldn’t really do it until cable TV
became a force in the 1990s. But the right believes correlation equals
causation as much as the left does which is why whenever they look back to the
past, they always start with the 1950s. That’s the America they believe existed
even though it was just TV. They are counting on the nostalgia factor and the
belief the past was better to win over the public – and it has worked more than
Democrats want to admit.
One of the more
interesting things about Peak TV has been that it has been poking holes in the
idea of institutions. This started with HBO, of course and while it’s clear in
all of the three classics that started the era, it applies the most to The
Sopranos.
There are quite a
few things you notice about The Sopranos. Perhaps the clearest tragedy
of Tony Soprano – aside from, of course, being a psychotic killer – is that he’s
a dinosaur trapped in an institution that is dying. Tony knows this even at the
start of the show: “I feel like I came in at the end,” he tells Melfi in the Pilot
and that’s true.
Always underlying The
Sopranos is the fact that the Mafia as it was in the past is coming to an
end as a force in organized crime. David Chase makes it clear on multiple
occasions how small the world Tony and his crew live in is compared to reality:
the first time in the second episode when Paulie and Silvio visit a coffee shop
and its clear how out of touch they are. The more critical story is something
we don’t note but is very apparent even on the first viewing of the show. It’s
not just that all of the people in Tony’s world are white males; it’s that none
of them are very young.
This is a truth
that plays out throughout the entire show. Most of the ‘new faces’ are in fact
former gangsters who have gotten out of jail after long stretches and
themselves are out of touch with the world, much less that of how organized
crimes work. The entire series takes place either in New Jersey and New York,
which is the extent of the Mafia empire by the late 1990s. The Italians no
longer have the control they once did and they no longer have the reach they once
did. They are clinging desperately to a way of life that is going to expire.
And its telling
how often in the series how much the characters quote The Godfather and
its other movies. You wonder sometimes how many of them ended up becoming gangsters
as much because the movies made it look glamorous as well as the fact it was in
their families. It’s also telling how much time Christopher (Michael Imperioli)
spends in the series yearning for Hollywood, wanting to be a screenwriter and
eventually helping make a low-budget film with a TV writer (Tim Daly) he met in
AA.
Christopher, it’s
worth noting, is the outlier on The Sopranos in which he’s the youngest member
of the Soprano inner circle. Most of the younger characters on the show,
beginning with Chris’ friend Brendan in Season 1 and ending with Jackie Aprile,
Jr in Season 3 are among the most notable casualties in the series. The
message, which the show makes very clear, is that the Mafia is a dying institution
because the younger generation, trying to find their own way, can never please
their elders of which Tony is the most prominent.
Tony is a dinosaur
because he can’t understand any part of the world he lives in. He constantly
references old Hollywood when he needs to find a way through life. “Whatever
happened to the strong, silent type?” he tells Melfi at one point. “Like Gary
Cooper.” It’s telling that Tony keeps longing for an actor to find his model
for reality. He constantly quotes films from the golden age of Hollywood and seems
constantly disillusioned by everything. Tony is running Jersey, but he is the head
of a pond that will just keep shrinking. He reacts like so many other white
men, lashing out at any change, stuck in the past and constantly making sexist
and racist tropes and unwilling to let even his family have any freedom beyond
what they want. You wonder if the sole reason he leans so much on Christopher
is because of his disappointment with his son, who he never seems to truly
understand and is always harder on then Meadow. A.J. is a disappointment to
both parents but Tony is far more brutal to him, particularly when he begins to
read philosophy and poetry. He is just as brutal to Christopher, who never does
anything to please him.
Even before he
betrays Adriana to Tony, Christopher has been shot and laid near death and developed
a heroine addiction. At one point he tells Adriana that his Uncle Tony is ‘the
man I’m going to hell for.’ Christopher
had a chance at one point to become part of the film industry in Season 2, but
Tony’s utter disapproval and disdain for it essentially stomp it down. Tony
believes in a way of life that is going to destroy everyone around him but as
far as he’s concerned his nephew is not entitled to take his own path. When he
finally kills Christopher near the end of the series, the only real shock is
that he chose to dirty his hands with it: at every opportunity, Tony has chosen
a dying institution over anyone else’s free will.
That the final
episode of The Sopranos is called ‘Made in America’ is a great irony.
Tony Soprano was made in America, but he has devoted his entire life based on
an outmoded version of it rather than the one that exists. Whether or not he
dies in the aftermath of the finale doesn’t matter he never really lived in the
real world.
I must say, even with
that, I can’t see Tony ever becoming a Trump supporter. It’s not just his whole
attitude (“The mouth on this guy” he’d say) but Tony’s from Jersey and he got
firsthand exposure to how Trump did ‘legitimate business’. If Tony had ever spent
thirty seconds with 45 on a deal at anytime during the series run (or before
given Trump’s early career) the Donald might have ended up in concrete under
the ‘other’ Four Seasons even before he hosted The Apprentice.
Much of the best
TV in the 21st Century has been when it exposes the past as to show
that the sepia toned way we looked at it was not only never real but worse than
we imagined. There are any number of series that could illustrate this but for
the purposes of this series, I intend to focus on four shows that have aired
mostly in the last decade and that take a deep look at parts of the 20th
century that the nostalgia factor is highest for. All of these shows won
multiple Emmys, two of them won Best Drama multiple times, one has won Best
Comedy and one of them is an underrated masterpiece that I consider one of the
greatest shows of the 2010s.
The series that will
be the most familiar to readers are Mad Men, The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel and
The Crown, specifically the first two seasons. The less familiar one
will be Masters of Sex, Showtime’s fictionalized drama about the lives
of groundbreaking sex researchers William Masters and Virginia Johnson.
If you know these
series you are no doubt aware that all of them focus primarily on Caucasian
white people and mostly wealthy and middle class ones. This is a deliberate
decision. While there have been many brilliant recent series that have shown
the reality of minorities in this era – most prominently Lovecraft Country -
the stories I want to focus on the stories of
those in the world that has been reflected in the ‘50s and 60s comedies and
drama of that era and reveal the darker truths beneath them.
Mad Men will look at the turbulent
1960s from the perspective of the so-called ‘silent majority’ and shows that
even there the revolution was affecting the privileged and the dissatisfaction was
evident even among the privileged. Masters of Sex looks at two people
who were blamed by many prominent people for turning America prurient and making
most Americans sexual deviant when the show makes it clear that all of these
practices - particularly homosexuality
prostitution, and all the different sexual positions people take – were always
there and all they did was report it. The Crown shows by looking at
England through its most cherished institution – the monarchy – shows not only
how broken the system but it how corrupts the people within in and shows the
rot at the center of Great Britain even when it ruled the waves. And The
Marvelous Mrs. Maisel looks at the sea change of the entertainment industry
in the 1950s and 1960s to show the flaws within the family unit post-World War
II and whether professional success is ever worth the cost of personal
relationships.
So many people
believe in the idea of devoting their lives to, if I may quote Elaine May, ‘a
way of life that perished long before they were ever born.” By looking at these
shows, we will take a look into that era and reveal that even the people who
lived that life were not only not celebrating it but were looking back even
then to a previous era.
No comments:
Post a Comment