Some
of you who have been reading my Jeopardy columns over the last few years
will know that I am covering familiar ground with the introduction. Please
indulge me.
For
a long time one of the crosses Jeopardy has had to bear was how few
women had won the Tournament of Champions. In 2022, Amy Schneider became only
the fourth in nearly thirty-eight year history of the modern incarnation to win
a Tournament of Champions and the first since Celeste DiNucci in 2007. In the
more than thirty years I have been watching Jeopardy, I have noticed
that there is a similar gender disparity in all of the ‘special’ tournaments
that have unfolded.
In
the 10th Anniversary Tournament in 1993, only one woman participated
in the Tournament at all and that was due to fate. With the exception of the
winner of the 1993 Tournament of Champions winner, the other eight players were
selected at random from a drawing of the semi-finals in the eight previous
Tournaments of Champions. Only Leslie Frates, who was a semi-finalist in the
1991 Tournament of Champions was chosen. She managed to make it all the way to
the finals of the tournament before being defeated by Frank Spangenberg in
Final Jeopardy.
It
would be another twenty-six years before another female champion managed to
make it all the way to the finals – and that has an asterisk next to it, which
I’ll explain. In the 2002 Million Dollar Master Invitational, Jeopardy invited
fifteen former Jeopardy champions to compete. The gender parity was pretty much
equal – eight males, seven females. After the quarterfinals were over, it was
still almost dead even; five male semi-finalists, four female ones. But despite
superb play by more than a few of these women, the finals of the Tournament
were an all-male affair, the first time that Brad Rutter would win the grand
prize.
The
odds were even more slanted in the Ultimate Tournament of Champions that took
place for much of 2005. 144 former Jeopardy champions were invited back to
compete in a tournament that took nearly four months to complete. The gender
disparity was far more weighted towards male contestants: there were four male
competitors for every female one at the start of the tournament and with each
round that passed, fewer female competitors managed to make it to the next
round. At the end of the finals, Brad Rutter would defeat Ken Jennings and
Jerome Vered for $2,000,000.
There
was a better gender balance in the Battle of the Decades in 2014. 14 players
from the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s were invited back to compete and the
male/female ratio was 2:1. (Contestants were also allowed to vote for a fan
favorite for each decade, but since all three choices were male I’ll leave that
out. For each decade, however, you had a choice of a field of five and each
field there were three males and two females.)
The
quarterfinals made it more than clear that it was luck that was keeping women
from advancing rather than gender. All but two of the matches were competitive
and in four of the fifteen matches, a female contestant was leading going into
Final Jeopardy only to lose the quarterfinal. By contrast in two of the
quarterfinal matches, female competitors were trailing in Final Jeopardy but
came from behind to win. Like the Masters and the UTC, the finals involved
three male champions but Brad, Ken and Roger Craig had all fought hard to get
to the finals and at the time, they could well have been considered the three
greatest Jeopardy players in history.
The
All-Star Games in 2019 as I have mentioned before featured six teams, each
headed by a captain. Brad and Ken were two of the captains and one of the
captains was Julia Collins, whose 20 wins were at the time second in Jeopardy
history only to Ken Jennings. Each captain was able to choose from twelve
former Jeopardy greats, eight male, four female. Despite the fact that Julia’s
team was the first eliminated, by the time of the final match, each of the
three final teams: Teams Brad, Ken and Colby each had a female member: Larissa
Kelly was on Team Brad, Monica Thieu on Team Ken, and Pam Mueller on Team Colby.
When Brad’s team prevailed Larissa was on stage for Final Jeopardy, making it
the first time – albeit with an asterisk – that a woman had participated in the
finals of a super-tournament.
I’ve
mentioned how pleased I was by the lineup of the Jeopardy Invitational
Tournament, but it was not until recently I realized how the good the ratio of
male to female invitees was. Exempting Amy Schneider, Andrew He and Sam
Buttrey, the ratio was fifteen male contestants to nine females, essentially
3:2. Proportionately, that’s the best ratio of male to female competitors a
tournament such as this has had since the Million Dollar Masters.
Just
as with the Million Dollar Master, the quarterfinals ended with five male
finalists and four female finalists. But for the first time in the history of
Jeopardy super-tournaments, the finals contained two female competitors to one
male one. And both Amy Schneider and Victoria Groce had to earn their way in
their semi-final matches; Andrew ran away with his game.
The
question going into a final that would require two victories to take a spot in
the upcoming Jeopardy Masters would that streak continue. Here’s how it played
out.
Game
1
From
the start of the Jeopardy round it seemed to be Victoria’s game. She jumped to
an early lead which she managed to make even bigger when she found the Daily
Double in the category IN THE PAST. She bet the $4200 she had:
“In
ancient Rome the conflict of the orders refers to the struggle between these 2
social classes with names that start with ‘P[. She knew they were patrician and
plebian and doubled her score. She finished the Jeopardy round with $10,600 to
Amy’s $6200 while Andrew trailed with $2600.
Andrew
seemed to take the early advantage in Double Jeopardy when he found the first
Daily Double three clues into the round. He wagered the $4200 he had in ON THE
MAP: “Tourists can swim in Devil’s Pool adjacent to Livingstone Island &
atop this natural wonder.” Andrew knew it was Victoria Falls and jumped to
$8400. It was as close as he or Amy would come to catching Victoria.
Victoria
got the next three clues correct before finding the other Daily Double in the
category IN THIS ECONOMY?! She chose to bet the $13,400 she had:
“Adam
Smith called this system of semi-free labor that ended about 500 years before
his time ‘barbarous’. She knew it was feudalism and jumped all the way up to
$26,800. She seemed to have locked up game 1 before it was even over.
But
no one told Amy Schneider that. She spent the rest of Double Jeopardy on what
seemed to be a fool’s errand: to get her total high enough so that she could at
least challenge Victoria in Final Jeopardy. And on the very last clue of the
round she managed to get her total to $15,000 to Victoria’s $29,600. Andrew was
out of the running with $9400. Still it looked good for Victoria going into
Final Jeopardy.
The
category was U.S. GOVERNMENT: “The formation of the Brownell Committee out of
concern over U.S. communications intelligence led to the 1952 creation of this
body. Andrew didn’t even try to answer and wagered nothing.
Amy
was next. She wrote down: “What is the NSA?” That was correct. She wagered
everything to double her score.
It
was up to Victoria. She wrote down: “What is the CIA?” Her wager of $401 was
irrelevant. Amy had managed what may very well have been the greatest
come-from-behind victory I have ever seen in my years of watching Jeopardy to
take the first game.
Game
2
Amy
and Victoria were dead even for much of the Jeopardy round. However, at the
halfway point it was Amy who found the Daily Double in WORKING HARD, HARDLY
WORKING. She bet the $4400 she had:
“This
traditional term for Japan’s famously hard laboring male office workers
references both wages and genders.” Amy knew it was a salaryman and doubled her
score to $8800. She didn’t get another correct answer for the rest of the round
but was still in the lead to Victoria’s $6800 and Andrew’s $3000.
Early
in Double Jeopardy Victoria got to the first Daily Double in NOVEL TITLE
CHARACTERS. She chose to bet the $11,200 she had:
“The
first name of this title character of a Defoe novel is an old word for a
prostitute.” Victoria knew it was Moll Flanders and jumped up to $22,400. A
huge lead but as she knew all too well, not necessarily a safe one.
This
time Amy got to the other Daily Double in the category CONSONANT-VOWEL x3. (As
Ken explained, each response would be a word with that pattern, such as
‘salami’. Amy bet the $12,000 she had:
“Catholics
hoping for special grace may pray this, said for 9 consecutive days.” Amy knew
it was a novena and jumped to $24,000. She wasn’t close to catching Victoria
who was already at $29,400 and she couldn’t close the gap. But all three
players were in it when the Double Jeopardy round ended: Victoria led with
$37,600, Amy was next with $26,000 and Andrew was third with $8600.
The
Final Jeopardy category was MYTHOLOGY. “A peasant who became the king of
Phrygia created this intricate problem that was solved in 333 B.C.” All three
contestants knew the correct response: “What is the Gordian Knot?” (solved when
Alexander the Great used his sword.) It came down to wagers. Andrew bet $8000
to go to $16,600. Amy bet $11,601, which put her ahead by $1. Victoria bet
$14,401 to give her a very impressive $52,001 and get her her first match
point.
Game
3
Victoria
got off to a fast start in the Jeopardy round before she found the Daily Double
in LITERARY LINES. As is her want, she bet everything she had. This time, it
didn’t go her way:
From
Hamlet, ‘This above all’, this phrase. She stumbled before guessing: “What
is ‘the rest is silence?” I recognized it was from earlier the play: “To thine
own self, be true.” She dropped to zero and had to start rebuilding. As a
result at the end of the round, the scores were much closer than usual:
Victoria had $5800, Amy $4200 and Andrew was at $3200.
In
Double Jeopardy Victoria again got off to a fast start and she and Andrew divided the first seven clues
before Amy was able to ring in. She then found the first Daily Double on her
next pick in OPERA SETTINGS. She bet the $6200 she had, though she didn’t seem
thrilled. She was right not to be:
“Verdi’s
Falstaff is set in this town during the reign of Henry IV.” Amy stumbled
before guessing: “What is Southwick?” I knew what the correct response was
because Falstaff is based on Shakespeare’s The Merry Wives of Windsor.
Amy lost everything.
Victoria
built her lead up to $15,600 when she got to the second Daily Double in THE
MEASURE OF A MAN. This time she bet $6000 in an effort to lock up the game:
“You
only need letters on the left side of the keyboard to type this unit of capacitance
that’s named for an English chap.”
Victoria
tried to use her mind to picture a keyboard and guessed: “What is Henry?” It
was the farad (named for Michael Faraday). She dropped to $9800.
The
battle the rest of the round was tooth and nail and when it was over all three
players were in contention: Victoria had a small lead with $11,400, Andrew was
next with $10,000 and Amy had recovered to $7200.
The
Final Jeopardy category was BODIES OF WATER. “The smallest inland sea in the
world, it’s completely within the territory of a single country & connects
two larger seas.”
Amy’s
response was revealed first: “What is the Sea of Marmara?” That was correct.
Ken explained that it is the little, tiny sea between the Mediterranean and the
Black Sea and it is located in Turkey.” Amy gained $1400 to put her at $8600.
Andrew
had also written down the Sea of Marmara. He gained $4401 to put him at
$14,401. He was clearly hoping to beat Amy by one dollar and that Victoria
would be incorrect.
It
came down to Victoria. She had written down: “What is the Sea of Marmara?” She
added $8601 to go to $20,001 giving her the second and deciding match point and
making her the winner of the first ever Jeopardy Invitational Tournament.
I
had few expectations of Victoria going into this tournament but watching her
play throughout the Invitational, it was hard to argue she wasn’t the equal of
all of the great Jeopardy players that had been brought back. (The same, it
must be said, is true of Brandon Blackwell who like Victoria is more known for
his play on The Chase than his Jeopardy record.) Victoria was exceptional
in all five games and was leading at the end of Double Jeopardy in every game
she played in, which is an impressive record given the level of the
competition. It was not until her final appearance that she made errors on
Daily Doubles in any of her matches. And considering that she managed to
personally defeat all three former Masters participants who were trying to get back
into this year’s Masters, one can say that she is more than qualified to meet
up with the other three.
The
Masters lineup for 2024 will now feature
Matt Amodio, Mattea Roach, James Holzhauer, Victoria Groce, Yogesh Raut and one
choice that will be revealed soon. We know the Jeopardy Masters will take place
next month: I imagine the final participant and the dates will be announced
within a matter of days.
And
now the long and seemingly endless postseason that has officially taken up two
thirds of Season 40 is over at last. So the question before we resume normality
again, was it worth it?
One
has to remember most of this postseason was created by circumstances beyond the control of Jeopardy’s
producers. At the end of the day, it might have been in the best interest of
the show to simply postpone the start of its season until the writer’s strike
at least had been resolved, if for no other reason than the optics were
terrible for all concerned.
I
remained unconvinced of the Second Chance Tournament merits for the show.
Despite the superb play of Juveria Zaheer, I still believe it is a core violation
of the principles of the show. However I am slightly more sold on the idea of
the Wild Card Tournament, not merely because some of my favorite players from the
past two years manage to earn spots in the Tournament of Champions this year
but because of the results of the Invitational Tournament. In Victoria’s
original appearance in 2005, after all, she would have qualified for a Wild
Card Tournament and one would be hard pressed after these past few weeks to
argue that there might well be other players in the past who might well have
done as well had they gotten the opportunity.
And
to be clear the last month and a half have almost, if not entirely, made up for
the long period we spent wandering in the wilderness. The Tournament of
Champions delivered all the excitement and surprises that we have come to
expect of them over the years and the new format has helped galvanize it in a
sense I was not expecting. And in its inaugural year the Invitational
Tournament more than delivered on all the potential it might have. It was
everything one can expect from a Jeopardy super-tournament and somehow
delivered more.
As
we return to normal competition tomorrow, it is unclear what Season 41 will
look like. It’s certain that there will be no postseason if only for the
obvious reason that there’s no way Season 40 will have nearly enough
participants. I do hope that the Invitational will return next season,
hopefully with a slightly different cast of former Jeopardy greats for the next
go-round. Perhaps by the time this season is over, they’ll have figured out the
setup for the next one.
Tomorrow
Lucas Partridge, who’d won the last games of Season 39, returns to defend his
title. He is the holder of a new Jeopardy record: he is now the Jeopardy
champion that had to wait the longest to defend his title. The previous holder
of this dubious distinction was Zack Newkirk, who won would be the last game of
an abbreviated Season 36 and had to wait until the middle of Season 37 to be
brought back to defend his title. He had to wait what was more than 97 games to
get back and his reason was because, well, 2020. To be fair Zack was able to
win six games and defeat Brian Chang, who’d already won seven to that point.
Will Lucas manage to have similar luck? We’ll find out starting tomorrow.
No comments:
Post a Comment