Written
by James Yoshimura; story by James Yoshimura & Tom Fontana
Directed
by Whitney Rasnick
Rewatching
Crosetti – one of the greatest episodes in Homicide’s storied history
and arguably one of the greatest episodes in the history of television – I had
reason to reflect on how, in all my years of watching television since I first
saw this episode television has almost never dealt with this kind of subject,
even in the greatest series ever made.
One
of the most daring things about Peak TV, as any critic will tell you, is the
high body count of almost every major show of that era. But having seen all of
these shows and quite a few of the other contenders among this period, what’s
striking is how few of those deaths came at the character’s own hand. I’m not
talking about the noble sacrifices that one would see on shows like 24 or
(I assume) Game of Thrones or The Walking Dead. I mean, shotgun
to the head, slashing your wrists, overdosing on drugs and leaving your friends
and family in a complete wreck.
In
the last quarter of a century, I can count examples of this happening on one
hand. Hostetler committing suicide after being accused of lying in the third
season of Deadwood, Lane Pryce hanging himself at the climax of Season 5
of Mad Men, Kuttner’s body being found in Season 5 of House and
Nacho deciding to kill himself rather than face death at the hands of the
cartel in Better Call Saul. No other examples immediately come to mind.
(If they do to my readers I welcome hearing of them.)
Television
has worked around the edges quite a bit, usually in the case of physician
assisted suicide and mercy killings particularly on shows like Grey’s
Anatomy. And notoriously 13 Reasons Why courted controversy by
focusing its first season on that very subject. But by and large suicide,
particularly among regular characters on any television, is a button that most
showrunners tend to shy away from. It’s understandable, done the wrong way, it
can feel exploitive and its an incredibly depressing and wrenching subject to
deal with. It’s almost safer to deal with the aftermath of a character being
butchered by a serial killer: at least then the grief is more understandable.
But how do you deal with the fact when someone you know and see everyday is
gone, by their own hand and you have to deal with that gap?
Tom
Fontana and David Simon are perhaps the only writers in all of Peak TV to ever
try and deal with the subject in their work in television. Fontana already had
in his previous series St. Elsewhere where in Season 2 Dr. Joyce
Randolph ended up dead in the Er with a note that explained nothing. He would
explore the subject again from many different angles in his follow-up series Oz.
Simon would deal with the subject a few times in his follow-up series, most
notably in Treme when John Goodman’s character, a husband and father
chooses to kill himself at the end of the first season. Both writers were
intelligent enough to never go out of their way to provide motivations for why
these characters would do so, understanding that the real pain comes from those
left behind. Homicide would deal with this issue in a few other stories
during its time on the air, but never as viscerally – or brilliantly – as it
did in Crosetti.
Its
effect was deadened when it first aired. Yet again the wizards at NBC argued
that Homicide needed to put up ‘life-affirming stories’ so as a
result a storyline involving Bayliss’
relationship with Emma Zool, which took up two full episodes aired immediately
after the conclusion to the ‘white cotton gloves’ murders. By the time we’re
ten minutes we know that Crosetti, who until this point the viewer assumed was
on vacation, is dead and has apparently been dead for some time based on the
discussion of the characters. When Crosetti aired two weeks later, it was done
with a subtitle before it started ‘a month ago’ so the viewer knew what was
coming. To be fair Jon Polito’s name hadn’t been on the opening credits so it
was safe to assume that his character was going to be written out of the show
but the fact that he was on vacation one day and dead the next with no
explanation was, to put it very mildly, disconcerting. As I may have mentioned
I didn’t see this episode until it was rerun so I didn’t know the context until
years later but it’s still an incredible display of cognitive dissonance on the
part of the programmers and insult upon
injury to the character.
To
the immense credit of Fontana and Yoshimura, there is nothing in the two
episodes that aired immediately before Crosetti to give any indication as to how
he died – he could have had a heart attack, died in an auto accident on the
way back from vacation or killed in the line of duty. The impact of the episode
is still powerful for the reasons I gave above: it wasn’t just that characters
didn’t get killed off in 1994; it’s that they certainly didn’t kill themselves.
And
few moments in the show have been more powerful then watching the harbor patrol
pulling a bloated, waterlogged corpse to the sound of John Lee Hooker’s ‘I
Cover The Waterfront’. Even now that we’ve been told the episode will deal with
Crosetti’s death, the mind doesn’t make the obvious connection seeing the
corpse even as Meldrick walks into the squad and covers for Gee, saying his
partner is fighting off a cold. When Felton and Howard start joking about
what’s going on between Meldrick and Crosetti, Lewis admits he’s started to
think something’s wrong. But he just think he did something to hurt Steve’s
feelings; he doesn’t really believe anything happened to him.
The
teaser of the episode which features Bolander and Munch talking about a bird
crapping on their car truly seems out of context with the rest of the episode.
In hindsight it’s clear this is what the two of them were talking about before
they got called to the harbor to investigate a suspicious death. Bolander’s
talking about visiting his ex-wife in Santa Barbara (he’s clearly feeling a
little less bitter at this point) and Munch is arguing about that divorced
people don’t see each other. They look at the body who’s been in the harbor a
week, Munch says “I hate these kinds of suicides”, Bolander chides him and
Munch backs off. Then they realize it’s a cop.
Then
we cut to Giardello’s office and Lewis jokes: “What I do?” Then he identifies
the badges and medallion as belonging to Crosetti.
The
power of this episode is that everyone knows exactly what happened from the
beginning to the end: they just don’t want to admit it to themselves. Lewis
makes it very clear that he doesn’t believe Steve killed himself and that he
wants ‘to catch the son of a bitch who did this’. Munch begins to back away
from his conclusion on the pier which angers Bolander no end. Giardello just
says to proceed under wrongful death, which infuriates Stan. Crosetti’s name
goes on the board and everyone just looks at it in shock.
Everyone
is dealing with this in their own way. Howard and Felton end up investigating
and closing the murder Meldrick is primary on so that he can pursue his
‘investigation’. Howard tries to ask Lewis to go out to dinner and keeps
clumsily asking if he’s okay. Lewis keeps pushing her off. With Felton he’s
more brutal, using the events in last year’s ‘See No Evil’ to basically bully
Beau into trying to slow Bolander’s investigation down. Felton knows that this
is crap but he makes a feeble effort in the episode that isn’t really
committed.
Bayliss
and Pembleton take on the burden of the memorial. This leads to their major
interaction in the episode when they are getting cookies. It’s here Frank makes
it clear that he has no intention of going to the church. “God and I are not on
speaking terms.” This selfish attitude is one he keeps for most of the episode.
(Wait.) The scene where Tim and Frank are buying the cookies and Frank starts
pushing for a discount on them will make anyone squirm and Tim, who’s usually
defers to his partner, is clearly furious at what he did. “This our friend. We
don’t go retail!” he all but shouts. Frank tries to push this aside but while
they’re talking, he’s trying to get out of a parking spot and he’s getting
ridiculously angry. He’s actually talking about shooting the cars before he
just runs out of things to say. “That silly man with his silly cookies,” Tim
says resignedly.
For
reasons that will become clear Andre Braugher’s work here is considered the
most memorable but this is an episode pushed
by three exceptional performances. The one that is the least talked
about, in my opinion, is Richard Belzer. As I’ve pointed out numerous times
Belzer’s performance is usually mixed with dark comedy, hiding behind a dry
poker face. Throughout the episode, it’s clear what’s going on is bothering
John in a way we’ve never seen before. He backs away from his original position
not so much out of pressure from Lewis but his own guilt. During the interviews
of the detectives he and Bolander come away talking about the murder of Joey
Winston, a five year old who his mother hung. He tries to take on more of the
role of a confidante to Bolander then usual and there’s also some genuine anger
about what’s happening. When Felton comes to see Munch at Lewis’ behest, he
says to him: “We all want to do right by Steve.” Munch says angrily. “We all
do. Problem is what’s right and what happened may not be the same thing.” He
then demurs and says he tried to get Stan to back off. When Beau says it must
not have worked he says: “Why do you think I’m alone?”
Throughout
the episode the usually dry wit of Munch is just a bit off. In the scene where
Munch introduces Tim to his brother (we’ll get to that) there’s clearly some
tension between the two, which Munch is in no mood to alleviate despite Tim’s
efforts to try. “Go wait in the car,” he tells him. He makes jokes about what
to say in the eulogy “The point of the eulogy is to lie” he says and when they
leave for the memorial and Frank stays behind he says: “Take care, Frank.” It’s
here we see how much this has affected him; this case has put him through the
ringer more than most and Frank’s selfish behavior is beneath contempt for him.
For
Ned Beatty this may very well be his finest hour on Homicide. Bolander
is trying to deal with the loss of Crosetti as much as anyone and its clearly
bothering him. As he tells Munch he sat three feet away from him for years and
he doesn’t know if he ever said as much as hello to him. (Crosetti and Bolander
never really interacted when Jon Polito was on the show.) He tells Munch that
he treated him with respect but it seems more like he’s asking him then telling
him.
What
no doubt angers Bolander as much as saddens him is that he clearly wants to
mourn the loss of his colleague but is being pressured by everyone to
investigate the death as if its murder. When Giardello comes to him, he finally
unloads:
“You
want me to let Crosetti’s death be a murder? A murder that can be solved. I’ll
do it. I mean, my clearance rate is so low already… Everyone says I have to do
right by Steve. And I keep thinking if he chose to commit suicide, what right
do I have to make it go away? I don’t agree with what he did, but if that’s his
final statement, should I wipe that clear just for our peace of mind?”
Giardello
doesn’t answer directly giving a sweeping statement about what Italians thought
should happen to a man who committing suicide. The exchange is very dark:
Bolander:
The Italians are an unforgiving lot.
Giardello:
Yeah, but we make great pasta. It balances out.
And
the episode represents one of the greatest performance in Clark Johnson’s
entire career on Homicide; he will give performances that show greater
levels of depth but will almost never lay his soul as bare as he does in
Crosetti. You can see him going through all five stages of grief during the
episode: denial at the start, anger at Bolander for the investigation, a kind
of bargaining with Giardello to try and pursue the case; despair when the
autopsy reveals what everybody knows already and finally at the end of the
episode, a kind of acceptance. The scene where Meldrick breaks down in tears
when he learns what he’s been avoiding is superb as well as when Stan just hugs
him. Lewis has been constantly moving since he learned the truth; in this
moment he just goes limp and yields himself to despair.
Throughout
the episode Giardello’s way of dealing with what has happened is for what he
sees as his own failure. His determination to get a honor guard for Crosetti is
clearly the only kind of redemption he can seek. During a sequence with Granger
and Bonfather, Bonfather shows the kind of stand-up leadership by being more
concerned with public relations. He thinks that if Crosetti killed himself, he
should not get an honor guard. During this he and Granger discuss a detective
who recently killed himself in a hotel on the block, with his blood pouring
down the drain. “What’s to get upset about? He knew when he did it we’d find
him like that,” Bonfather says callously. (This may sound cold even for a boss
but as we’ll see Fontana isn’t that far from reality.)
This
leads to the final minutes of the episode, the moment that will forever rank
this as one of the great episodes in TV history and will no doubt haunt me
until the day I leave this mortal coil. For the entire episode Frank Pembleton
has acted like a selfish jerk, refusing to go the church, being considered less
than human by some of his fellow detectives. Then the funeral procession, with
jazz fitting for the man who loved it, walks through the street and passing by
the precinct. We see Lewis look up first.
There
in his dress blues is Frank Pembleton, a one man honor guard. The moment that
Crosetti’s coffin passes the station, he stands at attention and salutes. The
last image we see (before Crosetti’s name is erased) is Frank’s solemn face,
taciturn as always but revealing so much with the eyes. After thirty years, it
still chokes me up and it will do the same to anyone.
Crosetti’s
death will haunt Homicide until the final episode and even past that.
It’s not just that he has died; it’s that the series never even tries to give
an explanation. There’s no note; no real indication from those closest to him,
and whatever his friends might have thought has been obfuscated by Lewis’s
efforts. And wisely the writers never try to explain it. Why should they?
Murder never make any sense; why should suicide?
What
matters as with everyone else on Homicide is the impact the loss of a
life leaves on those around them. The biggest gap will be the loss of a man in
the squad and the show will be dealing with that for this season and more many
seasons to come. The emotional fallout – that’s going to start being shown
later on and it never goes away.
Notes
From The Board
In a poll for Court TV of the 15 greatest
episodes in Homicide’s history, this episode ranked 3rd all time.
‘Undertaker
Munch’: Whatever humor there is in this episode comes from our first meeting
of Bernard Munch, played by Joey Perillo. Watching John and Bernard bicker and
Bernard clearly have the advantage is frankly hysterical. Around his brother he
shows little of the professionalism we see around him “How guilty are you?” he says. “The rule is
you might want to spend more on the deceased in death then you would in life.”
Then he goes through his coffins as if he were discussing Chevrolets. (Fisher
and Sons this ain’t.) He and John bicker about the costs before he gives him a
coffin. Bayliss spends much of the episode trying to point out the fact that
John’s never mentioned him to us before, points out the similarity in their
professions before John tells him to shut up. When he’s gone Tim finally lets
it out: “Between you and your brother. Thanksgiving at your house must be a
laugh riot.” John: “One life-affirming story after another. Bernard will be
mentioned again and show up from time to time for the rest of the series.
For
all Bonfather’s coldness, his remarks and Granger’s are from David Simon’s
book. In the epilogue Lieutenant Gary D’Addario (remember the name) and Sgt.
Landsman are called to the scene of a detective who committed suicide, much as
described her. Simon refers to it as a ‘detective’s suicide’ because one only
needed to turn on the faucet to clean it up. D’Addario says: “Fuck him. He knew
when he did it that we’d find it like this.
D'Addario
would later say this is the only section of Simon’s book that he took exception
with. “I did say it was a policeman’s suicide…but the tone which Dave (Simon)
wrote it was that I was condemning his suicide, and that wasn’t the case. He
was a good decent man, who was having some personal problems.
No comments:
Post a Comment