Tuesday, May 12, 2026

Why Celebrity Jeopardy Basically Proves Why No One Should Take Hollywood As An Authority On Anything (Jeopardy Champions, On The Other Hand…)

 

 

If you came of age in the 1990s and perhaps even if you didn't you are doubtless aware of one of the most hysterical recurring sketches on Saturday Night Live during that period. I'm speaking of the hysterical Celebrity Jeopardy parodies in which Will Ferrell played an Alex Trebek who couldn't even bother to hide how exhausting it was to have Burt Reynolds, Sean Connery and anyone from Minnie Driver to Phil Donahue to Adam Sandler proving just how incredibly dumb they were when it came to answering the easiest Jeopardy questions imaginable.

By the 1990s I was regularly watching Saturday Night Live and I found all of these sketches examples of what might have been called cringe comedy. And that was because I was a Jeopardy fan by this point and I was painfully aware then the average SNL viewer that, if anything, the writers were being generous to how incompetent celebrities were when they appeared on Jeopardy.

I've written about this before a few years back but I may have left out the personal aspect of it. And I have to tell you during this period when I was a teenager every time Celebrity Jeopardy took place it became painful for me to watch each year. Think how embarrassing it must be to be fourteen, fifteen, sixteen years old and watching celebrities you have seen on TV and admire immensely demonstrating over and over and over again that they are incapable of answering questions that you know very well.

I'll admit part of my problem was that they didn't seem to be taking the show that seriously. Even at a young age I took Jeopardy as almost a ritual and watching them clown around on stage, delaying answering clues and then constantly faulting each other and themselves on their inadequacy seemed very close to heresy. It tells you something that in thirty plus years of watching Jeopardy it is only the celebrity contestants who never take the show with any seriousness. I've seen middle schoolers on Back to School Week who took the show with a greater level of maturity then so many famous people in their fifties and sixties.

Now I'll grant you it might have to do with the fact everyone else was playing for actual money and the celebrities were just playing for charity.  That falls apart when one looks at the Jeopardy Masters and see James Holzhauers and Mattea Roach's of the world knowing that they will be playing for charitable donations as well as everything else and they take it with a competitiveness and respect that it deserves.

More to the point there is the fact that it was clear early on – I think by the time of 1994 at least – that the writers realized that the average celebrity did not, to put it charitably, know as much as the average Jeopardy contestant. That essentially meant them bending the rules until they broke. Ed Begley or Brett Butler finish in the negative at the end of Double Jeopardy? Give them money so they can compete in Final Jeopardy. The questions keep getting easier and easier and with few exceptions they keep getting them wrong. Guarantee them a $10,000 minimum if they finish Final Jeopardy with less than that – or for that matter, no money at all. (That happened a lot during the 1990s and beyond.)

Perhaps that's the reason I appreciated Will Ferrell's work as Trebek during those sketches in a way I didn't always like or enjoy much of his comedy on SNL during that period. He wasn't even trying to imitate Trebek or his cadences but as someone who wondered what had to be going through Alex's head during each of these weeks I thought Ferrell might actually be saying the quiet part out loud.  Alex was always a trooper no matter who the contestants were and I've often wondered how much effort it kept for him to keep that poker face. So I took a certain pleasure every time Ferrell would say some of the clearly dumbed down categories like "Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Word That Rhymes With Star' or told Minnie Driver "Are you English or just retarded?" As someone who watched these tournaments during this period there are so many times I had similar thoughts.

Now I'm not saying every celebrity who appears was a raving moron who couldn't tell the difference between Rutgers and Princeton and thought that a great tennis player was Andrew Agassi. There were some very intelligent Celebrity Jeopardy players who did the stage proud. Many of them, I should mention, were former SNL alum such as Jane Curtin or Michael McKean or sketch comedy veterans such as Cheech Marin. The cast of Law & Order was very capable at answering questions involving Ghastly Operatic Demises. Levar Burton and Kareen Abdul-Jabar proved their mettle multiple times. And obviously Ike Barinholtz has become something of a gold standard from this point forward.

But there's a reason that by the early 2000s I'd stopped watching all celebrity tournaments on Jeopardy. It was becoming exhausting watching some actors I admired – whether it was Steve Harris or Camryn Manheim on The Practice, Wendie Malick or Joseph Gordon Levitt, embarrass themselves. They say never meet your heroes; I'd say seeing Thomas Haden Church or Lynn Redgrave play horribly on your favorite game show counts.

I should argue this applies just as much to many political figures. During the 1990s and up until 2016 (perhaps for good reason) Jeopardy would invite many figures of note in the world of cable news or even politics at a certain level to appear on Jeopardy, usually in DC. If anything, they were more embarrassing then so many TV actors. And this was true no matter what side of the political spectrum you were on. Chris Matthews and Al Franken, Tucker Carlson and Wolf Blitzer, Anderson Cooper and Bob Woodward, they all performed so ludicrously badly – often, I should add, on historical and political questions – that they made me wonder if any of them actually knew anything that wasn't on a teleprompter.

 The polarization of today's politics pretty much stopped these weeks from happening because Jeopardy has always been the kind of show that doesn't actively seek out controversy. We make the argument that the tribal nature of politics has gotten rid of rational debate; these weeks make me wonder in hindsight if many of these people were ever capable of it to begin with.

All of which brings me to the title of my article as you might expect. Earlier this year around the time of the Golden Globes Ricky Gervais reposted made a joke about how celebrities are not authorities on anything. "You know less then Greta Thunberg." (After awards season he added the comment: "They didn't listen."

Now I've made multiple arguments as to why celebrities should stay in their own lane for years. It didn't occur to me until recently that well before Hollywood felt it was their moral duty to talk about all things political, I actually had videotape evidence of how little they knew about anything.

Am I saying that all of the celebrities who make dumb comments today were incapable of answering trivia questions on Jeopardy? Well the first year I saw it Rosie O'Donnell and Ed Begley, Jr two of the most left wing celebrities then or now played. Begley finished at -$1100 and O'Donnell finished in the lead with $2000. Along with Robert Gulliame they combined for 33 correct answers and 18 incorrect ones. 17 clues were left uncovered in both rounds. That night I missed the first three minutes. I still cleaned their clocks. I was thirteen.

Throughout my teenage years I regular defeated in combat Larry King, Kelsey Grammer, Dean Cain, Elayne Boosler, Sandra Bernhard, Eartha Kitt, Buzz Aldrin, Keith Olberman (he was with ESPN then) and Meredith Viera. To be fair I didn't do as well as Kareen-Abdul Jabbar, Jon Stewart or Cheech Marin and Alicia Witt got Final Jeopardy right on me once.

You'll notice that quite a few of these celebrities are still loud voices and some of them, such as Cain, Grammer and Rob Schneider are fairly regular on conservative talk shows these days. As a teenager I could beat them at Jeopardy. I'm not saying I could do it today but their track record on certain subjects makes me question why I should listen to any of them when they claim to talk with authority about the Middle East, economic inequality, racism in America or really anything that doesn't have to do with Hollywood. And since some of them can't seem to answer questions that directly refer to them and their field I'm not sure how much we can trust them on anything. (Bob Woodward missed a clue on Jeopardy that had to do with the film All The President's Men. All I'm saying.)

There may be those who argue that how an actor performs on a quiz show shouldn't be the sole measure of their intellect. I'd argue what measure do you want me to use that would be fair? Speaking as someone who has the greatest respect not only for Jeopardy but for all of the great players, super-champions or five day ones, who have walked on the Alex Trebek stage for the past four decades and continue to dazzle millions of viewers with their breadth of knowledge to this day. Are you telling me an actor should be held to a different standard then teachers, attorneys, students, accountants, bartenders, journalists and the average person Hollywood claims they either speak for or know better then?

In 1999 Eddie Timanus a man who was totally blind won five games on Jeopardy and his total of $69,700 was the most of any player in the 2000 Tournament of Champions. He was a semi-finalist in the 2000 Tournament of Champions and has been invited back three times to compete in Jeopardy 'Postseason tournaments before there was a postseason. The only thing accommodation he ever needed in his original run was that at the start of every round they handed him a card with the categories in Braille. The rest was up to him and he was pretty good at it.

In every single game in the Celebrity Jeopardy tournament that followed a few months later with the exception of Andy Richter played with a far better score then anything of them. For the record Rosie O'Donnell was invited back that year; she finished in a distant third and actually did worse then the previous invitation six years earlier. Eddie was, needless to say, answering questions much more difficult then any of the celebrities invited for that year's tournament.

I'm not saying that de facto makes Eddie smarter more than O'Donnell or more accomplished. I am saying that should Eddie Timanus choose to say something about the state of the country (which as far I know, he has not) I'd be more inclined to treat his opinion with respect and admiration then I have anything O'Donnell has ever said.

That brings me to a related point. After his incredible run on Jeopardy concluded a few weeks back Jamie Ding has been in the national spotlight the way that many Jeopardy champions tend to be when they do well for an extended period. He's spoken how important he considers his job as a state employee and how significant his accomplishments mean as a child of immigrants and a person of color.

I'd argue that Jamie Ding has earned his right to speak on certain subjects in a way that no one in Hollywood has. Because unlike them he is an average American who has had the spotlight thrust upon him.  So much of our society is built on so many people claiming to be speaking to the average citizen but we rarely do and most of them will never get a platform to talk about what they think. That is worth paying attention to in a way that all of the actors and athletes and celebrities really don't.

So if Amy Schneider or Mattea Roach were to talk about the issues that members of the LGBTQ+ community face (and both have) I'm fine with it in a way that I chafe when Asia Kate Dillon talks about how important gender neutral awards are. And if Jamie wants to talk of what it means to be a person of color in America he's earned it in a way that John Leguizamo's demands for representation in his industry don't land with me.  They're less insulated from what happens in this country then the bubble that surrounds Hollywood and I think we should hear their opinion.

As my writing has indicated I have a respect for Jeopardy champions in a way I hold for very few other people. I admire what they have accomplished in a way that's more relatable for me in a way that for all my respect for the craft of Hollywood and TV I don't think most people can. As someone who still wants to be on Jeopardy some day (I keep meaning to take the anytime test but never get around to it) I genuinely admire their intelligence, grace under pressure and humor in a way that I frequently find lacking in so many actors especially now. They are the average person who has to earn their fame in a way that the majority of those in Hollywood have long forgotten. When I talk about the Masters or the Invitational as 'the real Celebrity Jeopardy' for me there's a real truth to it that I think every fan of the show has.

Maybe the only way I could respect a celebrity would be if they were to appear on regular Jeopardy. I felt that way for Ike Barinholtz and even though they didn't do nearly as well, I respected the efforts of Lisa Ann Walter and Kamau Bell. If you're willing to be onstage with the average Jeopardy champion and risk a certain humiliation that does make you more human in a real way to me. I'm not saying that for me to take the Mark Ruffalo's or Hannah Einbinder's more seriously they'd have to appear on Jeopardy against the Jamie Dings and Harrison Whitaker's of the world, but it would earn my respect in a way their loud pronouncements from social media just don't. Most of you will go on SNL. You're halfway there already.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment