Sunday, November 8, 2026

Five of the Biggest Left-Wing Myths The 2026 Election Permanently Disproved (Even If They Deny It)

 

This past week's election was an enormous balm to my soul. Not just because it was a repudiation of everything Trump and Republicans have represented a decade. Or the historic nature of so many of the places and candidates who won. Or how it may very well have laid the groundwork for a new era of politics going forward.

No one of the smaller joys was where, how and what caused this Democratic landslide across the country was that it basically dismantled so many of the cherished beliefs the left has had about American politics, the electorate, how they think and the country itself.

To be clear I have no illusions that the self-styled progressives themselves will see it that way. I've known for years that the result of every election, no matter which side wins or by how much, the left will find a way to make it clear that the results proved that America wants progressive values, even in the aftermath of a Republican victory as we saw just two years. Even now they are trying to find a way to prove that this election was a validation of how they think and how every single candidate who was elected was in truth arguing for progressivism even if they never met them.

The thing is reality doesn't have a liberal bias and that is not true for the results of elections.  The results of this one basically disproved many of the core tenets that the left has sworn by for decades and that have calcified ever since the 2016 election. All of them had a grain of truth and certain historical evidence to back it up but never quite that deep beneath the surface was how the left has always viewed the world and how their own flaws have shaped realities that the Democrats have spent years, if not decades trying to overcome – and then this cycle actually did.

So here are five of what have been the biggest talking points of the left for the last decade, the truth behind each one and how they were spectacularly disproven this past week even before all the votes have been counted.

 

1. The South has been Republican ever since the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was signed and will never change.

For decades the left has ceased on the fact that supposedly when LBJ signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 he said that "I think we just handed the South to the Republicans for a very long time." That he said not out of celebration but mourning is something the left leaves out as well as the fact that it didn't happen overnight.

As I wrote in a series of articles during the rest of the 20th century a New South of moderate Democrats managed to win Senate seats and governorships during the 1970s and two of the latter Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton would eventually become President. In the aftermath of Clinton's election the Blue Dog Democrat coalition was founded of more moderate Democrats, mostly in the south at their height numbering over 20 percent of all Congressional Democrats. They only began to lose their seats when the Democratic Party started to move to the left in Obama's term, something progressives convenient leave out when they recount the history of the rise of Republicans. (They do that a lot as you'll see.)

Reality: The left has always felt the South is irreparably racist and has always gloated about how badly these states suffer compared to the north.

This has been true as far back as the antebellum era when it was by far the most genuinely true and they held this position throughout Jim Crow when America fall intents and purposes ignored the South. (They also try to leave out that the Democrats had one party rule from Reconstruction until the 1950s.) They've viewed how Republicans such as Nixon and Reagan would lean into racist overtones to win the South electorally as well as their eventual Republican lock on it. But they always seemed to think that Democrats shouldn't bother to go near it because that would mean they'd have to moderate their views. 

This was particularly true in regard to Joe Manchin, who was the bete noire of the left during Biden's administration to the point that he eventually chose to not only not run for reelection in 2024 but leave the party altogether. The fact that Manchin had been a Democrat for eighteen years in one of the reddest states in the Union didn't stop them from labeling him a DINO. If you're not a progressive, you might as well not be a Democrat at all.

2.  The Christian Right has used the gospel as a tool to maintain political power rather than actual faith.

While it's difficult to argue the fundamental truth of this fact, given the power the Moral Majority and other similar organizations used to use Christianity as an arm of the lord from the early 1980s on it ignores the basic fact that to the left…

 

Reality: Religion is the opiate of the masses.

Often used in the way the left attacks Reagan as being a tool of the Christian right is their saying that Jimmy Carter was a real born again Christian and Republicans rejected him because he rejected church's tax exempt status. Left out of that recounting is that during the 1970s many liberal Americans thought Carter's devotion to scripture off-putting, leading to what they called 'a weirdness factor'. Furthermore Carter was very much a centrist and a Southerner, which were always two strikes against him during the 1970s anyway.

Like all institutions organized religion is something the traditional progressive considers just something that is used to mislead the masses, just like military service and patriotism, and has always caused them to view them with contempt. That this has given an opening to Republicans that they used on the voters for half a century is something that they also choose to ignore.

 

3. The Republicans have gerrymandered the system so thoroughly that there is no point to even trying to compete in certain districts.

It's very hard to argue this basic truth, particularly in the face of the mid-decade gerrymandering that Republican states forced down legislatures in states like Texas and Florida in the past year, as well as what they've done ever since 2010.  When the right will gleefully refer to the way they redraw map as 'ratf---ing' it's hard not to argue how corrupt they've been. The thing is we've seen evidence in the 2020s that there are ways for Democrats to overcome these obstacles and we got the biggest proof of it this cycle.

 

Reality: The left doesn't want to compromise and try to win conservative votes.

As has been made abundantly clear during the last decade members of the Squad such as Ilhan Ohmar and AOC have had a hostile relationship with Blue Dog Democrats such as Jared Golden and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez as well as swing district Democrats such as Laura Gillen and Tom Suozzi.  That these Democrats had to win Republican votes in order to be reelected – something none of the Justice Democrats or DSA candidates ever have to worry about – is something that in the minds of the left should not be a factor. One must do the moral thing and if the voters in your district don't get that, well, they're just dumb.

This is part of the antiestablishment mindset that the left has always had, never mind that once you're elected to Congress you are de facto part of the establishment.  That these Democrats are needed to help build the majority to even try and get the votes in order to even try and pass some of the legislation the left wants is not relevant to Justice Democrats and DSA members. That it's been dragging down the majorities in both Houses of Congress ever since 2018 is another fact they refuse to acknowledge but the DNC could not.

 

4. Too much power is given to states where 'nobody lives'.

Even before the 2016 election the left was very big on how 'unfair' it was that DC and Puerto Rico weren't represented in Congress and argued how much more population they had then smaller and usually more conservative states. Much of this was legitimate considering how the way Mitch McConnell had essentially ground the gears of democracy to the hall by using the filibuster.

The problem was even after 2016 the Democrats still had a presence in many of these conservative states. Heidi Heitkamp was representing North Dakota, Ben Nelson was still representing Nebraska, Jon Tester was still serving Montana and Claire McKaskill was still representing Missouri. Democrats could win in these states and were still there.

Reality: The left hates flyover country.

There's a more judicious way to say this, particularly how urban America has always looked down on rural America but increasingly during the last decade the left has developed a 'red states bad, blue states good' mentality. They seemed to rejoice about how many states that were led by Republican governors and senators were doing much worse at so many levels then those of blue states. The fact that minorities, women, LGBTQ+ and other Democrats lived in these states along with all the MAGA people and no doubt suffered as much by these policies – more than they would in blue states – never seemed to enter that consideration. They seemed to rejoice at how many people were migrated from these states into urban areas, never thinking for a moment that some of them might be Republicans as well.

By their own definition the people in these states needed the leadership of progressives in order to be saved from the decades of Republicans who were using them solely for political ends and didn't care if they suffered. But there was never even a trace of empathy for the people in Alabama or Idaho, only the idea that they were collectively reaping what they sowed.

 

5. The Electoral College has cheated the people of Democratic Presidents.

Reality: See Number 4.

This argument has faded slightly in the aftermath of the 2024 election where Trump managed to win his biggest popular and electoral majority in his three runs. But I have little doubt it will pick up again the closer we get to 2028.

The left never got over the robberies of 2000 and 2016 each time arguing that the Democrats won the popular vote. In both cases the correct response was "California won the popular vote for the Democrats." In 2000 Al Gore won the popular vote of George W. Bush by about 500,000 votes but carried California by 1.3 million votes by far the biggest margin Gore had in any of the states he carried. In 2016 Hilary Clinton won the popular vote over Donald Trump by over 3 million votes but won California by nearly 4.3 million votes the largest margin by any Democrat since 1936. I don't remember anyone pointing that out during the next four years.

I understand this part: the Democrats have been struggling with the label of being coastal elites for decades and it doesn't help that both of results in these elections spell out their biggest flaws. But it also gave weight to the left's sincere belief that the people really wanted Democratic (read progressive) leadership and it was only an antiquated system that the right was rigging that kept them in place. In their minds autopsies of the 2016 election or indeed any election Democrats lost was unnecessary: Republicans could only win by cheating. In other words do exactly what the left has been preaching and the wins will come. That this was proven disastrously wrong in 2024 did nothing to change the left's approach.

 

Now after the results of midterms have unfolded it's clear how each one of these progressive bubbles has been popped.

- The Democratic Party has won more races in the South  both at a Congressional and state level in nearly thirty years, most of them in states that were deep in the heart of Dixie. Annie Andrews won a Senate seat in South Carolina, the first time a Democrat has in 28 years.  Keisha Lance Bottoms became the first African-American woman in history to be elected governor when she won the governor's race in Georgia. Scott Colom is on the verge of becoming the first African-American to win a Senate seat in Mississippi since Reconstruction.

Roy Cooper's win North Carolina has reshaped the Congressional delegation in that state where it seems like it will have a majority Democratic Congressional delegation. Combined with Jon Osoff's landslide reelection in Georgia, it's clear the Democrats can win in the South.

- Seven of the Democrats who won elected office this cycle were ministers or pastors. The most prominent is Adam Hamilton, leader of the biggest church in Kansas who has become the first Democrat to win a Senate seat since 1932. James Talarico, the Democratic Party's new hero for his triumph in Texas, has freely used the gospel while campaign.

In addition many of the freshman democrats in Congress have campaigned on their background in the military, including Cait Conley in New York and Rebecca Bennett in New Jersey. All of this contrasts tremendously with the majority of the Justice Democrats and DSA members, the vast majority of whom are activists.

-One of the biggest stories of election night is just how much the radical gerrymandering of so many states blew up in the Republican's faces. This is true not just in Texas and Florida, where the most public abuses took place, but also in Alabama and Tennessee. More importantly to this point 52 Democrats have flipped seats that were overwhelmingly Republican for decades. By contrast the DSA, which was considered the big story of the primary season, have a grand total of eight members for the next Congress. The Blue Dog Democrats alone have fourteen new members – and they may change immense as the New Congress takes shape.

- In the aftermath of 2024, there were no Democratic Senators in states Trump carried remaining. After Tuesday there are already six Democrats in those states and by the time all the votes are counted there will likely be two more: Scott Colom in Mississippi and of course Mary Peltola in Alaska.

The Democrats also flipped Congressional seats in many red states, including three of the four in Iowa, one in South Carolina, one in Missouri, one in Montana, Utah and Nebraska. In addition the Democrats flipped the governor's race in Texas (naturally) Georgia, Iowa and Ohio. Even the state everyone was sure they would lose – Kansas is looking like it will stay in the Democrats hands.

-In 2016 the Democrats had just 16 states under gubernatorial control. Ten years later they now control 28 governorships a majority for the first time since 2006.  As was recording these 28 states control 392 electoral votes. Of the major electoral prizes on the map only Florida managed to keep a Republican governor – and not by that much.

And keep in mind in this entire election the Republicans didn't flip a single Democrat Senate seat, governor's race and look like they might flip at most 2 or three Democratic seats. All their gerrymandering, all the money spent, everything they did to rig the system and it was nearly the extinction level event that Ron Desantis said it was.

It remains to be seen if this has stalled much of whatever momentum there has been for left-wing organizations like the DSA and the Justice Democrats; what is clear is that the media that has given it so much of the oxygen that has driven it in the decade since Bernie Sanders' primary campaign is basically considering a footnote in the aftermath of the results.

The best example of this came in Nithya Raman's victory in the Los Angeles mayoral race. Just one year ago Zohran Mamdani's victory for a democratic socialist in New York City had the media's attention for weeks and months after election day. Now another democratic socialist has done the same in an even larger city – and it has been regulated to an afterthought in almost every major network this week.  The media has been focusing the entire week waiting to see how Mississippi and Alaska turn out, they could give a damn about what's happening in LA.

That's the clearest sign as to how little the left now matters in the national media sphere. For months the world was convinced that Abdul El-Sayed would be either the savior or damnation of the Democratic Party. By the time he won at 3 A.M. early Wednesday morning, everyone wanted to talk to James Talarico or Adam Hamilton instead. It took until Friday for MSNBC to talk to a Justice Democrat/DSA winner – Chris Rabb – and when they did they illustrated how many districts the Democrats had flipped in comparison to how many the DSA had won.  All the discussion of Congress was about how Democrats in both houses were planning to work together, now that the left could be regulated to a statistical insignificance in the House and how Adam Hamilton made it clear he wanted to be the best friend of Jerry Moran, the same thing John Fetterman had been doing when he worked with his Republican colleague Dave McCormick for the good of Pennsylvania.

There has been an unprecedented historic landslide, a sea change in American politics. And it must bug the hell out of the left that it not only went against everything they've been preached about America for decades but also that the rest of the country, never mind the Democratic Party, cares much less about what they have to say then they did a week ago. I have no illusions the left will be any less loud and obnoxious then they have before last week, but I take great joy in the fact that the entire country made their voices heard and that  the left's opinion was very, very small compared to everyone else's. Let's hope that it lasts for all our sakes.

 

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment