I am not one of those mad
literalists who thinks that any adaptation needs to be absolutely wedded to its
source material in order to be successful and more importantly, enjoyable. I've
seen more than my share of TV adaptations of popular books and movies that have
come to be far and above the material they came from. One need not look any
further than Buffy or Justified to see projects that have
become far more outstanding than they the work they came from.
I also share this same feeling
towards comic books, mainly because, not having viewed most of the original
source material, I don't care how close it has to stick to it. I realize that I
am in a minority when it comes to this, but honestly I feel that, like so many
other projects, comics could use a push away from their origin stories if they
are to survive in the modern era. What I
care more for is entertainment, not viewing DC and Marvel as if they were the
Bible.
Which brings me to Greg Berlanti,
the man who has been more responsible than anyone for making the CW a success
story. He has gone above and beyond in making many of the second string
superheroes of the DC-verse far more appealing than some of the more recent
adaptations on film. But the problem is, he sometimes gets too stuck on message
than entertainment, and nowhere is that more apparent then Supergirl.
Now, let's be honest, with all the
comic book adaptations out there, television was crying out for a series with a
female lead. And by far, the best thing about Supergirl is the title character. Melissa Benoist does a fine job
making Kara Danvers, Superman's cousin, a far more realistic person with insecurities
and flaws than so many of the others. It can be fun watching the Girl of Steel
fight villains twice her size, as well as try to deal with her place in the
world in National City . And as long
as the stories were entertaining, I honestly could give a damn about how far
away the series was from its source material. I didn't care that Jimmy Olsen
(Mechad Brooks) was now African-American or that Kara's sister Alex (Chyler
Leigh) was now a lesbian. As long as the stories were engaging, who cared?
The problem is that the messages
behind the show got heavy-handed. Now this is nothing uncommon to Berlanti's
series. The difference is on Arrow, and
to an extent, The Flash, watching the
characters work through all of their issues was much of the fun, and the message
delivery was subtle. In Supergirl, the
message is far more heavy handed and has less entertainment value as a reward.
This was particular clear when it was revealed in last season's finale that the
President of the United States
was actually an alien. It came as a climax to many heavy handed message about
xenophobia and the upper class throughout the second season, that were neither
as clever or as entertaining at the writers thought.
As the third season unfolds, Supergirl has managed to lighten up on
the heavy hand material. Unfortunately, its ideas for new storylines aren't
particularly original either. We've got another evil billionaire, Morgan Edge.
We've got Lex Luthor's sister, Lena purchasing Catco,
and trying to be friends with Kara. And we've got this mysterious woman who
seems to have some superpower that only her young daughter truly suspects.
Intriguing ideas - except they were all done on Smallville, and its not that encouraging that Berlanti is now
borrowing from another CW show. Granted, it was a hit, but one that took a long
time building up to be a great series.
Supergirl
is not a bad series, especially compared with what Fox and ABC offer as
comic book derivations. The performances are generally better, particularly
Dorian Harewood, as head of the DEO /Martian
Manhunter. But its by far the weakest of the Berlanti DC series, and its not
clear that its found a serious foundation. after two years. It needs more power than its title character
seems capable of providing.
My score: 2.5 stars.
No comments:
Post a Comment