I expected Watchmen to do well with the Emmys:
given not only the level of technical work that went into, but the superiority
of the writing and performance, it was outstanding. Did I expect it to be the
most nominated show, period? Not this much. I guess this officially breaks the
comic book curse. Let’s go over the rest.
OUTSTANDING LLIMITED SERIES
Watchmen, Little Fires Everywhere,
Unbelievable, and Mrs. America I
predicted would be here. The fifth
series was a bit of a shocker. I Know
This Much is True was a bit of a long shot, but honestly I thought that The Plot Against America or even Hollywood would have a far better chance than Unorthodox. Well, at least Black Mirror won’t overshadow
everything.
OUTSTANDING ACTOR IN A TV MOVIE/LIMITED
SERIES.
There’s
something not right here. I expected Jeremy Irons, Mark Ruffalo and Hugh
Jackman to be here. But have the Emmys decided that Breaking Bad has gotten enough Emmys? Where’s Aaron Paul? For that
matter, are the Emmys really that far
left wing that they didn’t nominated The
Loudest Voice at all? Russell Crowe was good enough for a Golden Globe? He
didn’t even get nominated for an Emmy.
I may have
doubts about the Emmys constantly nominating five Limited series when there are
at least six or seven good ones, but they’ve had room for six actors. So why
are there only five? And why are Jeremy Pope and Paul Mescal nominated when
their series didn’t get a Best Limited Series nod? Something is amiss here.
BEST ACTRESS IN A TV MOVIE/LIMITED SERIES
It gets even
harder to fathom in this category. Cate Blanchet, Regina King, and Kerry
Washington more than deserve to be here. But what did Reese Witherspoon do to
get robbed three times by the Emmys?
And how can you nominate Unbelievable and
leave out Kaitlyn Dever and Merritt Weyer? Is there some kind of bias against
the police procedural that I’m not aware of.
I know there was
praise for Octavia Spencer for Self-Made and
Shira Haas for Unorthodox, but it’s
more than obvious the Emmys nominated the wrong actresses from Netflix. Again,
I ask why are their only five nominees when there lots of great performances?
What’s going on?
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR IN A TV MOVIE/LIMITED
SERIES
It gets even
freakier here. Now I expect Yahiya Abdul-Mateen II to get nominated for Watchmen, but if you’re going to go as
far as to nominate three actors from the series, how can you ignore Tim Blake
Nelson? Don’t get me wrong, Louis Gossett Jr. more than deserves his
nomination. But Jovan Adepo was only in two episodes of the series. It would’ve
made more sense (and I could’ve lived with it) if Don Johnson had been
nominated instead.
Now Jim Parsons
and Dylan McDermott were highly thought of for Hollywood so I’ll let that go. But seriously,
nominating Tituss Burgess over John Turturro. Don’t get be wrong; I’m all for
nominating a comedy in this category, but they were far better choices from TV
series. Jessie Plemmons or any of the group fro El Camino for one.
BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS IN A LIMITED SERIES
OR MOVIE
This is the
closest to a logical group that I saw. Toni Collette and Jean Smart are the
heavy favorites in this category. I expected Mrs. America to dominate this category, but it was going to be
really hard to pick which brilliant actresses were going to be nominated. I was
right about Uzo Aduba for her work as Shirley Chisholm, I nearly picked Tracey
Ullman over Rose Byrne, and I’m always glad to see Margo Martindale nominated
for anything.
That said, did
the Emmys just get tired of nominating Allison Janney? I realize they may have
thought seven was adequate for now, but I find it hard to fathom that Holland
Taylor deserved to be nominated over here. (Or any of the actresses in Little Fires Everywhere or Hong Chau for
Watchmen, or… let’s just leave it at
that.)
Well, I’ve got a
lot of TV to catch up on. I’ll keep you appraised as we get closer to Emmy
night. (Though what it’s going to actually look like is beyond me.)
No comments:
Post a Comment