Friday, July 26, 2024

As Season 40 of Jeopardy Ends Some Suggestions About What The Show Should Do Going Forward

 

Well Jeopardy fans the fortieth season is now behind us. And while the first half was a shit show of epic proportions I think we can say the second half redeemed it, if not completely made up for it.

We witnessed a Tournament of Champions filled with more surprises in the shows history. We saw the first ever Jeopardy Invitational Tournament which more than lived up to the hype and was just as surprising as the Tournament that followed. We saw the winners of both those tournaments, Yogesh Raut and Victoria Groce, demonstrate that they deserved to be considered among the Jeopardy Masters with Victoria dethroning James Holzhauer in an epic battle. And when the ‘regular games’ actually began after more then two-thirds of the seasons over, we had what we actually have had on Jeopardy since the passing of Alex Trebek: a period where we saw more Jeopardy champions have successful runs over a sustained period.

Because in just 78 games we have seen seven players qualify for the next Tournament of Champions all of whom won four games or more. We also saw the longest run by a Jeopardy champion since Cris Panullo more than two years ago, who was defeated by a real life Survivor contestant who went on to win seven games in a row himself.

For the record, here are the eight players who will be competing in the next Tournament of Champions:

Lisa Ann Walter: 2023-2024 Celebrity Jeopardy Winner

Allison Betts: 5 wins, $121,500

Amy Hummel: 5 wins, $100,994

Grant DeYoung: 4 wins, $81,203

Amar Kakirde: 4 wins, $55,899

Adriana Harmeyer: 15 wins, $349,600

Drew Basile: 7 Wins, $129,601

Isaac Hirsch: 9 wins, $215,390

That’s not a bad array, considering the real season started in March. There have also been multiple three game winners during this same period, but I won’t recount them here for purposes of space (though their relevance will come up later in this article.

I have little doubt the Jeopardy producers are planning Season 41 as we speak, assuming they haven’t begun to shoot it already. It’s hard to know if they’re capable of learning from bad ideas and mistakes on a large scale but you never know. Two of the biggest ideas that met with great backlash from Jeopardy fans  - that contestants had to say the full name and dollar amount of every category when they made their selections and both highlighting the clue on the board – were quickly discarded. The former was rejected before the season was halfway over and while the latter idea came into play in prime-time tournaments, it never happened in the syndicated game. And considering that in this year’s Masters last year’s ‘gimmick’ of revealing where the Daily Double (s) were to the viewers was clearly never used, it is clear that the show will listen to the fans if there is enough of an outcry.

So with that in mind, here are some suggestions of what Jeopardy should – and shouldn’t – do in the coming season. Some of the suggestions are painfully obvious, some less so, but I think all of them will only benefit the game both short and long term.

 

1.      No extended postseason at the start of the season.

This is perhaps the most obvious lesson to learn from how Season 40 played out but I think it needs to be driven into the ground.

To reiterate, this was a horrible idea even from a theoretical perspective and in practice it was excruciating for every single fan of the show. While there were outside factors to be sure – the writer’s strike and how it affected the Tournament of Champions – it was a flawed concept from the start because it argued Jeopardy could control outside events. Don’t do it again, and in a related subject:

 

2.     Get rid of both the Second Chance and Wild Card Tournaments.

 

Not to be Captain Obvious but the Second Chance Tournament was a horrible idea when it was proposed in 2022 and it played out even worse when it was executed. To do so again on a much grander scale was an equally horrible idea not mitigated one iota by the fact that this time the winners only qualified for the Wild Card spot. And no Juveria Zaheer isn’t nearly enough of a justification for six weeks of tournaments.

The Wild Card Tournament wasn’t done much better for the record. Considering that in the first wave three of the winners were players who would have been eligible had you just let three game winners in the first place – something you had to do anyway to fill in the brackets – we have to acknowledge that while inviting back everybody who won a Jeopardy game in the last three years was a horrible idea in every way. Don’t try anything like this ever again.

That doesn’t mean we should have special tournaments, however, which brings me to my next points.

3.     Bring back the College Championships and the Professors Tournament.

 

I really did question why you spent so much of 2023 reinventing the wheel when not only didn’t you have to, you had better examples before you. When you invited runners up in the College Championship and Professors Tournament to play in the Second Chance and Wild Card tournaments, didn’t anybody even suggest: “Why not just have whole new tournaments in those categories?” And considering that Sam Buttrey very quickly became one of the most beloved Jeopardy players in history, wouldn’t it have been logical to hold the same tournament that first brought him into the field? There might not be another Sam but considering how many great Teacher Tournament winners there have been over the years, there might at least have been another Colby Burnett.

And why didn’t you have a College Championship, either in regular play or prime time? I realize that there might have been some difficulties considering both of these had been Mayim Bialik’s purview when she was on the show, but so what? Bialik was in charge of the first Celebrity Jeopardy and you let Jennings take that over.  The College Championship has been part of Jeopardy for more than three decades, why did you throw it over for a tournament that no one wanted and didn’t pay off? And in a similar vein:

4.    Bring back the Teen Tournament and let the winner participate in the next Tournament of Champions

 

Considering that there hasn’t been a Teen Tournament since before the pandemic, I’d say not only is it time to reinstate it but to let the winner get the right to compete in the Tournament of Champions, something no winner has been able to do since 2000. Jeopardy will need young blood going forward and considering the success of Season 39’s High School Reunion Tournament, I think it’s time we have them back. And considering that Leonard Cooper winner of the 2013 Teen Tournament more than acquitted himself in your most recent Invitational Tournament, it’s hard to argue that they shouldn’t be invited back now.

 

5.     Spread out all future Tournaments.

It worked fine for Jeopardy in the Alex Trebek era and in the first full year after Trebek passed. I never understood why you fixed something that wasn’t broken. How you do it I will leave to your judgment but for now I’d suggest doing the Professors Championship in November, the Tournament of Champions in February, and the College Championship in May. As time goes by you may need to make adjustments but that’s what Jeopardy had do throughout its long period on the air. You have to adapt.

Now that I’ve told you what changes you should make, here are some things you should keep doing.

 

1.      Keep the format of 27 invitees and a single elimination format for all Tournaments.

I confess I’ve come to change my mind on the idea of it, if for no other reason then I like seeing more champions rather than less. It does throw out the tradition of the four high-spots for wild-cards but since that was messier than some tournaments I’ll let that go.

2.      To fill out the brackets for Tournaments of Champions, invite back 3 game winners if necessary.

Considering this was what had to be done anyway in order to fill out this year’s roster and that many of the winners of Champions Wild Card including Josh Saak and Yungsheng Wang, were three game winners anyway this should be a no-brainer. Considering it was being done in the Trebek era you’re not breaking any sacred trusts.

 

3.      Go back to a two-game total point affair in the finals for every tournament.

Considering you did it both for the Masters and the Teen Reunion Tournament, I don’t think much is lost by doing it. I honestly think more strategy would be in play in every tournament rather than just trying to win a best of seven or four tournament.

 

4.      Keep the Invitational Tournament as a yearly event.

 

I’ll have some specifics about how to do that going forward but I would suggest it happen immediately after the Tournament of Champions every year in order to prepare for the Masters. Hence the Tournament of Champions should be in February and the Invitational in March. There would  be a hiatus but at most it would be about a month and considering the circumstances, I think the fans can live with that.

 

5.     For the last spot in the Masters the fans should be allowed to vote.

 

Considering that Amy Schneider had to publicly apologize for how she got into the Masters this past year, I think we can agree the producer’s choice is a bad idea. Instead, let’s have the fans vote on it.

The format I have in mind would be based on something akin to the ‘fan favorite’ that was used for all three rounds of the Battle of The Decades in 2014. A field of five would be chosen. I’m still working on the details but what I’m considering for now is:

 

The first and second runners up from the previous Tournament of Champions.

 

3 Players Who Did Not Play In The Most Recent Invitational Tournament

 

The vote would take place on Jeopardy.com and whoever got the most votes would enter the Masters as ‘the fan favorite’. It’s not a perfect method to be sure, but it’s definitely better than how you completely dropped the ball this year on the subject.

 

I believe with these choices Jeopardy can overcome the shakiness that ‘the endless postseason’ wrought this year and have a successful run into the distant future. At the very least it’s a better answer than bringing back every player who nearly beat Adriana or won just one game this year. I think we can all agree those were the wrong answers no matter how they were phrased.

I’ll be back when I learn more about the new season of Jeopardy one way or the other. Otherwise I’ll be writing about the show in September.

No comments:

Post a Comment