I’m not so much surprised that
David E. Kelley is behind Apple’s Presumed Innocent as I am that it’s
taken him this long to finally turn to a
limited series. This is, after all, the man who became a household name with
his work on LA Law and spent the next twenty years revitalizing the
courtroom drama to the point that when he finally got to Harry’s Law he
was clearly running out of things to say.
Perhaps that’s the reason that he
has spent so much time with the works of Lianne Moriarty ever since he returned
to form; he didn’t want to risk falling into old patterns. He’s come close to
it over the last few years, sometimes at the expense of the original work’s
merit (The Undoing), sometimes giving it energy (Love & Death).
But finally this past year in between writing the most recent season of Nine
Perfect Strangers he managed to get to work on his version of the novel
that put Scott Turow on the map and was made it to a hit film for Harrison Ford
in 1990. While that movie was generally superb, it’s clear after the first
three episodes that not only has Kelley and his cast justified the update, but
that it is yet another argument as to why limited series should be the de facto
starting point for almost any literary adaptation going forward.
The basic plot is still the same:
Cook County ADA Rusty Sabich (played by Jake Gyllenhaal) learns in the opening minutes that his
colleague Carolyn Polhemus has been murdered. He learns that she has been strangled,
possibly sexually assaulted and tied up in the manner of a former case. His
boss Raymond Horgan (Bill Camp, taking over masterfully from the role Brian
Dennehy perfected) puts Rusty on the case even though Rusty has a conflict of
interest which his wife Barbara points out: “All the Das in the office; they
couldn’t find one who didn’t sleep with her?”
Barbara knows Rusty and Carolyn had an affair but she believes Rusty
ended it, and they have kept it quiet from their children to this point. That
will very quickly become the least of their problems.
The more immediate one is that
Raymond is running for reelection against one of the colleagues he mentored Nico
Della Guardia (O-T Fagbenle) who offers support in private and uses it as a
bludgeon to campaign against it on TV. Rusty has less than ten days to come up
with anything and he finds nothing to go on, except the barest of leads. It’s
not clear whether he’s genuinely stonewalled or he’s trying to keep De La
Guardia’s top lieutenant Tommy Molto (Peter Sarsgaard) a man who we start out
loathing and who very quickly becomes the monster we expect. On election day Della
Guardia wins and Molto takes over. The day he does Rusty is called in to go
over in the investigation and Molto lets him know about his fingerprints and
DNA at the office – and the fact that when Carolyn died, she was pregnant.
Raymond is stunned by this, not
only because Rusty withheld this information from him but because he had no
idea the affair was going on at all. This quickly becomes the least of the
problems Rusty is facing as he now must tell his wife not only did he not end
the affair when he said he did but Carolyn was the one who ended it and he
spent much of the last several weeks repeatedly texting and emailing her to the
point that he says it will seem like he was stalking her. Then he has to inform
his children – who didn’t know about the affair at all – and has to face repercussions
from his therapist (Lily Rabe) who is angry that he has been lying to her all
this time. Raymond becomes increasingly desperate and infuriating because of
the lies he’s been telling and the forensic evidence becomes worse and worse.
Eventually he turns to Raymond as
his defense attorney (a slight variation from the novel) and Raymond does so
against the advice of his wife Lorraine (always glad to see Elizabeth Marvel).
She knows better than he that this is a bad idea because regardless of the
outcome it will damage Raymond in away he is not prepared to deal with. Both Molto
and Della Guardia (and by the second episode its clear Molto is driving the
steam roller) are determined to make this personal and Raymond clearly wants to
go just at hard. Only the Judge is the voice of caution and its clear she has
no patience for the sausage-fest that has already begun.
By the third episode Rusty is
pinned in a way he doesn’t want to admit. He’s the center of a media circus,
his wife is barely holding it together and his son and daughter no longer trust
their father. Barbara is considering an affair of her own, he’s already
assaulted the medical examiner and there are photos of him the night he was
there. He doesn’t know yet but the audience – and fans of the novel – know that
Molto has a call between the two and it shows just how obsessed he was.
If anything Presumed Innocent is
the kind of novel that may not only well be evergreen but benefits from a
modern take. In 1990, the idea of a media circus around a trial was not the
everyday event it is now and the idea of Rusty going into hiding is now completely
ludicrous. This adds to the tension of the series; Rusty has used these tools
before countless times and now they are being turned on him in a way that he
never thought would seem possible. The fact that we live in the era of CSI as
well as cameras on phones means that Kelley and his writers don’t really have
to do much to make the tension modern.
The wrinkle that might bother some
– although I seriously doubt the internet is inflamed about the work of 1990s
legal thrillers the same way they view comic books and sci-fi – are some of the
updates to the characters. Barbra is played by Ruth Negga, a bi-racial actress
instead of Bonnie Bedelia, though nothing else about her has changed. Della
Guardia is now African-American and while Judge Lyttle is still African-American
she is now a woman. The biggest change so far is that Sandy Stern, the attorney
who took over Rusty’s defense and has been played on film by Raul Julia and TV
by Hector Elizondo, is mentioned but not
present. The equivalent seems to be Mya Winslow, played by Gabby Beans. Finally
the lead detective who was played by John Spencer in the original is not played
by Alana Rodriguez and is a Latina.
I suspect these updates are more
to bring the series in context with the modern era; in 1990 all of the key
figures in Chicago were white males, with the exception of the judge who was
played by Paul Winfield. What’s more important is that Kelley has not made an
alteration in how they behaved in both the book and the movie: Fagbenle is just
as oily as before, Rodriguez is just as angry at the betrayal of someone she considered
a friend and Lyttle has no patience for the machismo on display.
The biggest change, though perhaps
unsurprising when you consider Kelley’s work in the last decade, is that he makes
the women as important as the men are. Barbara is allowed to have her
bitterness at the fact she now feels trapped in a marriage with a man who has
betrayed her over and over. Lorraine, practically a non-character in the
original, is allowed to be the voice of reason not just for her husband but
overall. (She also makes it very clear how big a betrayal Rusty has committed
by ignoring him and sympathizes with Barbara.) And Carolyn, who was seen mostly
in flashbacks and in both versions of the story more of the instigator then
sympathetic, is allowed to be more than just an object of desire. Played by
Renat Reinsve, we get to see a lot of her – and not just in the flesh. We learn
she was keeping secrets of her own, some of which Rusty didn’t know and which
he now considers a betrayal.
As you’d expect given the level of
the cast, the acting is top notch. Jake Gyllenhaal is, if anything, better than
Harrison Ford was in the original film. At the time Ford had rarely been giving
the opportunity to stretch beyond his action hero muscles and the idea of him
playing a cheating bastard and a man wrongfully accused was not something he
could easily handle. (He managed to get the latter down fine by the time of The
Fugitive; one can debate his ability to the do the former in What Lies
Beneath.)
There’s also the not
inconsiderable fact that Gyllenhaal has always been a better actor that Ford
and certainly has been given the kind of roles where he can show his range more
often than Ford has gotten until relatively recently. Gyllenhaal’s performance
is that of a man who realizes very quickly how pinned down he is by the
situation and then keeps making decisions that are understandable but nevertheless
look horrible even as he makes them. He knows he's not guilty but he also knows
that counts for nothing in the eyes of the law – and more importantly, the eyes
of his friends and family. Kelley goes out of his way to constantly undercut
our sympathy for Rusty in his position; he may not be a killer but he’s
demonstrated he’s an excellent liar and regardless of how this turns out, a lot
of his bridges will be burned.
The rest of the cast, as you might
expect from the actors involved are superb, but in my opinion the absolute
standout is Sarsgaard’s work as Molto. Sarsgaard has been one of the quietly
best character actors in Hollywood for more than a quarter of a century in such
films as Shattered Glass and Kinsey. (He and Gyllenhaal actually worked
together in Jarhead in 2005.) In the past decade he’s been superb in many
undervalued series on TV, from his work on The Killing, critically
acclaimed but under-viewed series such as The Looming Tower and Wormwood
before he finally received his due for his superb performance in Dopesick
as the DA who exposed the Sackler family’s role in the opioid crisis. But
his work as Tommy Molto is next level. Playing a man whose own mentor says has
both ‘a persecution complex and a narcissist complex’ he is absolutely
loathsome in every scene we see him in. It says something that Della Guardia
constantly has to remind him: “we need to find Polhemus’s killer, not get
Rusty.” It's clear every time we see him that he wants to get Rusty and if he
happens to be the killer, that’s a side benefit. The last scene of the third
episode, where he plays the recording of Carolyn and Rusty’s phone call is,
like Tommy himself, both monstrous and pathetic at the same time. We see him
strut, dance, do push-up and recite his opening argument over and over and you
know this is a man who would gladly obstruct justice just to throw it in the
face of a man he hates. Both the series and Gyllenhaal are favorites for award
nominations; if Sarsgaard doesn’t get at least one on the leadup to the Emmys,
there’s something wrong with the awards as I know them.
Anyone who has watched limited
series adaptations of books over the years knows very well that the adaptor may
very well take liberties with the ending. Kelley has already done that at least
twice, both with the ending of The Undoing and the first season of Nine
Perfect Strangers, so it won’t shock me if he chooses to do the same, even
with one of the most famous ones of the 1990s. As I have only vague memories of
the original novel and as someone who cares little about this to begin with, I
remain confident with Kelley’s decision. This is a master’s hand and the
courtroom drama has been his place of business.
It didn’t shock me that Presumed
Innocent was renewed for a second season; as anyone who has read Turow’s book
knows a fair amount of his novels take place in the world of the Chicago legal
system and he himself has written a sequel to this book. It is unclear what
form the second season will take; whether it will take place in the world of
Turow or whether Kelley will visit a completely different scenario with a
different cast. I find myself unbothered because I am satisfied with this one.
It has taken be awhile to begin watching streaming series that will be for
consideration for Emmys this year. I’m glad I presumed to start with this one.
(Sorry.)
My score: 4.25 stars.
No comments:
Post a Comment