Almost from the
moment it debuted in 1975 Saturday Night Live has been breaking ground
in political comedy. And for nearly as long it has been subject to immense
attack from commentators from both sides of the aisle.
With the rise of
Fox News and partisan politics it has been mostly a target of Republicans and
the right wing, particularly since Donald Trump has become the de facto
mouthpiece of the GOP. What might come as a shock to younger viewers is that
for far longer, it has been a target of critique from the most strident left-wingers
who frequently hold it to the standard that it somehow is not going hard enough
in its approach to Republicans. I found examples of this in a book on comedy
written in 1983 which argued that Saturday Night Live was not merely overrated
but a failure in part because, in the author’s opinion, it had not gone hard
enough after then President Reagan.
Not only is denying
SNL’s approach to Reagan – in a later article I intend to show just how
hard the show went after Reagan almost from the start of his Presidency to the
end - but it shows a problem the left
frequently sees in regards to society. It seems to be arguing that the right portrayal
of Reagan on a late-night sketch comedy show had greater political influence
than journalism, Congress or the voter. And this view is reflecting currently
when it comes to how current progressive publications look at SNL’s approach
to Donald Trump today. It is a bizarre amalgam of the argument that their
approach to satirizing Trump has failed because it either normalizes him in the
public eye or hasn’t done enough to make it clear what a danger he is to the entire
world. This is an immense burden to put on anybody, and it’s a ludicrous one to
put on a late-night comedy show even one that’s been on the air as long as SNL
has.
There is a huge
disconnect between both sides as to the purpose of SNL’s political
parodies of which it remains superbly gifted after fifty years: it is
essentially to satirize those in power by point out their flaws for the purpose
of humor first and only after that to make a larger statement. That statement
is to be left in the mind of the viewer to realize. Saturday Night Live has
never had any power, either now or at its inception, to influence the electorate.
And those who want to point out the occasions it has – Chevy Chase’s impersonation
of Gerald Ford, Tina Fey’s of Sarah Palin – give too much credit to SNL for
that and not nearly enough to numerous outside factors. Entertainment’s job is
to reflect the mood of the public and there is no evidence that it can do
anything to shift the electorate’s opinion. If that was the case after Will
Ferrell did his humiliating impression of W in 2000, Al Gore would have won in
a landslide and we know that didn’t happen.
What Saturday
Night Live has done – extensively and frequently brilliantly – is point out
the flaws in our political discourse and political figures well enough to make
us laugh hysterically. At the process, at the people and ourselves for voting
them in. Its approach to political humor has changed slightly with the times
but, when one looks it over the course of its run, not really that much. What has
changed is how America views politics, the role of the 24 hour news network
and the increasingly ridiculous nature of so much of our politics. And in the
last decade there has also been increasing pressure from both sides that
political comedy is doing America a disservice, with one side arguing it’s not
treating politicians with any respect and the other arguing, just as loudly, that’s
its not doing nearly enough to tell America how much danger its in from the
other side. Lorne Michaels himself has
acknowledged that its much harder to be funny these days, particularly when so
many people on either side truly seem to argue that politics is too important
to be mocked.
That is, for
the record, exactly why SNL is important today as it was when it debuted
not that long after Watergate. No matter how dark the times are we have to be
able to laugh at ourselves and the world around us. Some would argue that it’s
a luxury we can’t afford; I’d argue it’s a necessity that we can’t reject. One
of the tenets of America is the right to free speech and that includes the
ability to mock those in power. If people have a problem with that I’d argue that
the problem is with them.
I have spent
the better part of a quarter of a century watching Saturday Night Live. And
as I’ve mentioned in previous articles I have also watched an immense amount of
SNL in syndication from the 1980s up until the 1990s when I began more
or less watching it constantly. Given that, as well as my extensive knowledge
on American history I believe that I have a better qualification to talk about
the kind of political humor that SNL has done over the last
half-century.
What this
series will do is look at how, over the years, many of the greatest comedians
on SNL have caricatured and parodies the political figures that have
dominated the last fifty years. These include not only the Presidents who have
served during that period but also many of the major political figures, some of
whom ran for President, some of whom were in the background. It will also look
at how the approached changed over the course of time, including in regard to many
of those major figures. And it will look at how the show approached Donald
Trump – though in this case I intend to focus on the period before he entered
politics and not after, mainly because that part has already been extensively
covered.
I hope to show
that Saturday Night Live hasn’t changed in 50 years in its approach to
politics: it’s still doing variations on what it did from the moment Chevy
Chase started tripping when he portrayed Gerald Ford. However, I don’t think it
has a moral obligation to change its approach at all; if anything it has a far greater one to do exactly what its been
doing for fifty years: keep pissing off the people in authority by making them
look like idiots. And I actually think a good way to start show this is to show
something that has been a constant throughout its entire run: showing that the
political figures (with one glaring exception) have been good sports about it.
In the cold
open of one first season episode we saw a performance of ‘The Dead String
Quartet’. Four cast members were shown propped up at their instruments. Slowly
but surely they began to fall over, producing a random chord. The final person
to be knocked over was Chevy Chase, who fell off the stage. Just as he opened
his mouth, the show cut to footage of Gerald Ford who said: “Live from New
York, its Saturday Night!”
This might have
been the first real indication of SNL’s place in the cultural Zeitgeist:
the President that the show had been mocking since its premiere appeared on
film to open it. More importantly it began a trend that SNL has
continued ever since: major political figures showing up on the show not so
much to entertain (they’ve only been sporadically good at it) but to show they’re
fine with being mocked.
As George W.
Bush has said recently he never took any of the impersonations that Will
Ferrell or his successors did personally. “When you’re in public office, you
have to accept that being laughed at comes with the territory.” That’s part and
parcel with campaign even before television became part of it; you have to show
you’re a human being and there are few better ways to do so then to show you
can take a joke.
This happened sporadically
during the first few years after Lorne Michaels left the show in 1980. Some
elected officials began to host the show. Ed Koch famously did so in 1983 (his
monologue where he compares Ronald Reagan to himself is one of the show’s
highlights from the decade) and George McGovern and Jesse Jackson did in the
lead up to the 1984 election. Jackson came off the best, mainly because he didn’t
try to be funny and let the writers do it for him. This may have been clearest
after his opening monologue when he left the stage and headed into the
broadcast booth. Just before he got there, a warning signal went out, all of
the technical people left – and were replaced by African-Americans. The audience
laughed and applauded because even in 1984 it was very clear that you didn’t
want to get Jesse Jackson upset about racial disparity anywhere.
It's not clear
what Reagan thought of the satires on him but his son clearly enjoyed it. One
of the highlights in the shows history came when Ron Reagan, Jr. hosted the
show. In one of the best cold opens of all time, Ron talks to his parents who
are away at Camp David and want to make sure everything goes well at the White
House while their son is there. The segment then cuts to Ron Junior, decked out
like Tom Cruise in Risky Business and cavorting around the White House
to ‘That Old Time Rock and Roll.”
Political cameos
were rare in the next decade, though there was a priceless one when Paul Simon,
a regular host of the show since its founding came back, appeared on the show In
December of 1987. He came out – and there was Paul Simon of Illinois, who at
the time was campaigning for President. Simon the Senator was known for his
stiffness on the campaign trail, so the two men’s interaction showed both at a
comic highlight as the two explained how frequently they got mistaken for each
other. “That explains why so many people were disappointed when I showed up at
Ames last winter,” Simon the entertainer said.
It’s telling
that during the 1990s both of the major Republican nominees for President, George
H.W. Bush and Bob Dole, not only seemed fine with the mockery they were
undergoing on SNL but were more than willing to play along. When Dana
Carvey came back to the host the show in 1995, George Bush Senior showed up in a
filmed segment. “Now there’s a lot of things I could say about Dana Carvey. Not
gonna do it. Wouldn’t be prudent,” he said openly mocking Carvey’s constant
catch phrases -which Bush never used. Dole took a step further appearing on SNL
after losing the Presidency in 1996 and talking with Norm MacDonald the man
who’d impersonated him for nearly two years. “I have to tell you, I never go
around saying: “Bob Doles this’ or Bob Dole that,” he told MacDonald. “It’s not
just something Bob Dole does.” After that laughter died down, he took a step
further. “The thing is Norm; you’re just doing a poorer version of Dan Aykroyd’s
impersonation of me. I know it, you know it, and the American people,” echoing
Aykroyd’s catchphrase over the better part of years of cameos. Both of these,
it should be said, went over far better than the decision to let Steve Forbes
host in 1996, where he truly bombed.
A highpoint came when Al Gore hosted in 2002.
Gore, known for his stiffness on the campaign trail, was hysterical from beginning
to end. There were two highlights: Gore in a filmed segment on the set of The
West Wing with much of the cast, perching himself on the set of the Oval
Office and refusing to leave when the shooting was done. “Well, he did win the
popular vote,” Bradley Whitford said. Just as funny was Al Franken returning as
Stuart Smalley (he had not yet entered politics) and having a session with ‘Al and
Tipper G. John McCain actually hosted the show the following year and was
willing to parody John Ashcroft on Hardball. “We’re investigating
Shaquille O’Neal,” he told Darrell Hammond as Chris Matthews. “We understand he
played a genie in Kazaam!” It’s telling that even after Tina Fey’s torching
of Sarah Palin in 2008, he was willing to appear on the episode just prior to
election day, preparing to move into his second career in home shopping. (One
of the products he was offering: ‘McCain’s Fine Gold!”)
By that time,
of course, both Hilary Clinton and Barack Obama had made cameos on SNL during
the 2008 Democratic primary. Other politicians showed up to mock themselves
(David Patterson showed up to taunt Fred Armisen’s parody of him) and just
before the New Hampshire primary in 2012 Jon Huntsman showed up on Weekend
Update to talk about his campaign and asked Seth if he was registered in New
Hampshire. All of which is to say that when Donald Trump was invited to host in
the early fall of 2015, a decision that has been criticized at the time and
that the cast members regret now, the show was doing nothing it hadn’t done
over the past forty years. Saturday Night Live had a long and glorious
history of invited actors and figures they had spent years mocking and as
anyone who’d watched the show knows Trump had been mocked by the show for
decades even before he’d started hosting The Apprentice. There was
nothing radical or wrong about their action and they certainly did nothing to ‘normalize’
him in the minds of the public. (As I shall relate in a later article while the
show found it hard to satirize Trump, they were accurate in many critical
facets of his personality long before he got into politics.) The only difference
was, of course, that Trump had no sense of humor and couldn’t take a joke.
What was likely
more significant was that, after Trump hosted the show real-life elected Republicans
have refused to cameo on SNL. Democratic candidates have been more than
willing to do so -Bernie Sanders showed
up to appear alongside Larry David, Elizabeth Warren showed up alongside Kate
McKinnon’s portrayal of her, and Joe Biden gave a recording cameo. There’s an
argument a major sea change occurred in February of this year when Ayo Edebiri
hosted the show.
The cold open
featured Trump giving a town hall to women voters – and Nikki Haley was there
questioning ‘Trump’. Haley was loose but willing to satirize herself and when
Edebiri showed up to call her on her question about the cause of the Civil War,
she gave an honest answer. The left excoriated SNL for giving Haley an
audience. I’d argue it was the best thing not only for Haley but for future
political discourse. For eight years the GOP has steadfastly refused to allow
itself even the opportunity to be mocked on television. That Haley was willing
to do so - and took it in the spirit of
those like Dole and Bush senior – actually gave me a glimmer of hope during
what was increasingly a long and grim election year.
For obvious
reasons the right is up in arms when last night Kamala Harris made a ‘surprise’
cameo on SNL alongside Maya Rudolph who has been impersonating her for
five years. In my opinion the more interesting cameo came later that episode in
one of the most on-point satiric political sketches SNL has done in
years.
John Mulaney,
who was hosting for the sixth time and who was a writer on the show for years
previous, has always been one of the great talents to appear on the show during
the last decade. I can’t say how much he participates in the writing process
each time he returns but I suspect given the patterns that occur with his
hosting (last night we saw what was the fifth Broadway satire of a
quintessential New York Institution that comes with each Mulaney appearance) I
expect he is welcome. Which makes me sure he wrote the sketch that I’m talking
about.
In what his
second guest host appearance in 2018 there was a brilliant sketch called ‘What’s
Their Name?” in which Mulaney played a contestant who couldn’t recognize people
he knew at work or had met on multiple occasions. Last night we saw ‘What’s My Name:
Election Edition” Mulaney was again a contestant and Michael Longfellow took
over the job of hosting. (I don’t know why Bill Hader wasn’t there but the show
didn’t need him.”
Mulaney was playing
the role of a white progressive who identified major political figures
including Jack Smith. “You sound passionate about this,” Longfellow said. “This
is the most important election in my lifetime,” Mulaney said with the solemnity
of a progressive. “Democracy is on the line.”
Longfellow then
said: “For $300,000, let’s her it from the man himself.” And out came Tim Kaine.
“I was Hilary’s running mate in 2016.” Kaine said. “You know, in the most
important election in my lifetime when democracy was on the line. What’s my name?”
Mulaney’s face quivered with indecision. “Um, Tim Walz,” Buzzer. “Come on, it
was eight years ago. That’s less than one Zootopia.” Kaine said. “Not
only does he look like Tim Walz but his first name is Tim,” Longfellow said. “We’ll
give you three choices. Tim Clinton, Tim Tim or Tim Scott.” Mulaney: “The first
two sound don’t real. Tim Tim!” “No, it’s
Tim Scott.”
Kaine erupted. “I’m
Tim Kaine.” “Sure you are.” Longfellow said. “I’m a Senator for Virginia. “Good
for you,” Longfellow said as Kaine walked off in a huff.
The entire
sketch is an instant classic but the part that drove it home was that when
offered ten million dollars Kaine came back out – and Mulaney still
couldn’t remember his name.
I don’t think
this sketch will receive nearly the attention that Harris’s appearance will, regardless
of the result of the election. But I’d argue it’s by far the most on-brand and accurate
sketch SNL has done about the election. It skewers so many of the targets that are
vital, the far left’s Trump derangement syndrome – particularly white
progressives – their selective outrage and most importantly, their short memories
particularly in regard to their causes. And most importantly, in the appearance
of Kaine’s mocking everything that the Democrats have been holding dear for the
last eight years – including his role in it -
shows a sign of self-awareness that viewers and indeed the rest of the
political media and all around it might do well to keep in mind when they
discuss how disastrous the results will be for the election regardless of who
wins. The fact that I know that both sides are going to focus on the cold open
rather than Mulaney’s sketch won’t surprise me in the least – anymore than it
will anyone on SNL.
No comments:
Post a Comment