Wednesday, November 12, 2025

By Refusing To Engage With The 'Controversies' Surrounding Her Sydney Sweeney is Showing How Mature She Is And How Childish Hollywood and the Bubble Around Is

 

Earlier  this year like so many other people I wrote about the so-called controversies surrounding Sydney Sweeney. To wit, that she appeared in an TV advertisement for American Eagle Jeans, a company that is associated with conservative politics and that she was a registered Republican in Florida. I may have gotten the order in which was revealed to the media first but at the end of the day that's irrelevant: the left wing jackals of Hollywood chose to start to tear Sweeney apart.

I noted the irony of the fact that Hollywood and much of left-wing America was perfectly fine with the near pornography that was at the center of Sweeney's breakout hit Euphoria but that the moment she started doing things that were closer to being aligned with right wing America that was beyond the pale for them. Now it is the practice of the industry to actively root against Sweeney, who just last year was the idol of so many. The box office failures of her most recent critically acclaimed movies are considered a statement by the masses against her politics even though films like Eden and Christy have never been historically the kind that drive huge box office, particularly now. The failure of the latter alone has caused both Jon Stewart and Ruby Rose to essentially tear Sweeney apart, though for different reasons.

When these kinds of 'controversies' surround prominent names in Hollywood – really so many people in the age of social media – there have always been two approaches. The first is that you go on an 'apology tour' even if you've done nothing that you should have to apologize for in an effort to win back the masses. The second is that you choose to double down on her beliefs and blame everyone but yourself, an approach taken far more with Republicans and some progressives in politics. The industry would be fine if Sweeney chose to do either: they could welcome her back into the fold with the former and choose to shun her with the latter.

The problem is that ever since the American Eagle ad occurred Sweeney has infuriated both Hollywood and the left by choosing an option that almost no one does any more and therefore an industry built on it is unprepared for it. She has chosen to basically ignore it and say its not important. This was clear in the immediate aftermath when Sweeney was seen with castmates from Euphoria and she chose not to really talk about it with the press. As far as she was concerned it was a non-story.

I should mention that for all of the faux outrage that has come from Hollywood and the media over the last several months we have heard no backlash from anyone who works either behind the scenes or with Sweeney on camera in Euphoria. Considering just how prolific all of these actors have become and considering how many of them are very vocal about their politics I find this fascinating. Considering how vocal Zendaya is on any subject matter and that her politics almost certainly are the opposite of Sweeney's that she has been radio silent on the matter is striking. (It's not like she hasn't gone out of her way to court controversy albeit in the opposite direction as her co-star.) It's not that I believe in the happy cast story of Euphoria any more than other shows but in this era I'd have expected at least a tweet or Instagram post one way or the other.  Whatever outrage there is against Sweeney in Hollywood it isn't coming from her co-stars.

(To be sure in private Zendaya has said she's outraged by Sweeney's doing the ad and taking the attitude she has. I'll deal with that hypocrisy in a minute.)

This past week Rolling Stone sat down with Sweeney to 'address the controversy'. I've no doubt that the reporter Larisha Paul was expecting her to be belligerent or apologetic. Instead Sweeney basically chose to say that she was apparently the only person in America who didn't care. Paul tried to get her to say she was supported by Trump and Vance. Sweeney's response was: "I wasn't thinking of it. I just kind of put my phone away. I was filming Euphoria…working sixteen hour days…so I didn't really see a lot of it."

Furthermore she pointed out that the idea that there was some kind of backlash was a myth. She paid attention to the sales and she made it clear the controversy "was all made up…It was all just a lot of talk."

These are mature responses that answer the questions the reporter asked. But they're not clickbait and they don't make people angry. It's clear the reporter wanted to talk about that but Sweeney was more interesting in talking about her movies. "I've always believed that I'm not here to tell people what to think. I'm just here to kind of open their eyes to different ideas." There's nothing that different between what Sweeney has said in this and really anything else that any major celebrity says about any film or show they make. Republicans they really are just like other people.

Finally in a clip that's already become a meme the reporter really tried to get her to say something controversial: "Do you want to clarify anything about the ads for her great jeans and great genes?" It was bait. And Sweeney yet again didn't take it: "I think that when I have an issue that I want to speak about, people will hear."

This goes against everything Hollywood and the media has been trying to do in the last decade in particular even though it’s the kind of behavior that society should in theory smile upon. As children we're taught that when you are being pressured and/or bullied the best thing you can do is either ignore it or don't engage. Professional politicians have behaved cooler under pressure than Sweeney did in this interview with Rolling Stone. And the bullies, er, left-wing media circle are infuriated by it.

I find the reaction of certain people very telling particularly Aimee Lou Wood who commented on a post arguing that Sweeney was not commenting on something about white supremacy this post said:

At least say you how horrified you were by how this campaign was amplified and celebrated by unrepentant racists who believe in eugenics. At least recognize the harm your jeans campaign has caused black folks."

Now I agree there are many things in the world that are harming African-Americans and black people in society today. The idea that Sydney Sweeney appearing in a jeans ad that was used to by conservative media caused even close to the damage that the current administration is doing to African-Americans is basically the kind of thing that you'd expect from Hollywood in where, even after the results of last year's election, they are still convinced has an affect on how the world works.

Furthermore the phrasing by some people was critical. "If you don't have a stance on white supremacy you 100 percent have a stance on white supremacy." Again this is put in the attitude of the left who argues unless you are 100 percent with them you are against them – and even they will turn on you in a second.

And it is worth noting there are more than a few people who truly do think that this is absurd. One fan on Twitter said, "Seriously we're at the point for a young woman needing to be apologetic about being attractive because she inferred she likes her genetic code….There's no racist undertone, unless you choose to put it there."

I also find it striking that one of the people who came out against Sweeney was Aimee Lou Wood, who as my reader know full well might very well appear under the dictionary next to the term 'snowflake'. Remember last April when Saturday Night Live while satirizing the Trump administration in The White Lotus made fun of Aimee Lou Wood's character?  The next day she went on social media, said the sketch was unfunny and that the show was clearly attacking her which was, according to fans “c’nty and uncalled for” You’d think Wood would have been flattered to be made fun of on Saturday Night Live – supposedly that was a badge of honor among some people. But apparently now her feelings have to be taken into account. The same, of course, does not apply to Sydney Sweeney because she took a point of view that Wood disagrees with.

Listening to the reaction against Sweeney by so many in Hollywood I couldn't help but be reminded of another performer in an HBO series that has been taking increasing fire, this time from the conservative media: Bella Ramsey of The Last of Us. Ramsey has been the target of both body shaming and homophobia from the internet and that only increased when they came out as non-binary in the aftermath of the first season. The vitriol Ramsey has endured must be even more toxic then the kind Sweeney has endured in the last few months and I have applauded them for their strength.

With all this furor one would have expected Ramsey to want to try and shore up support from both the left and the LGBTQ+ community. That made their remarks to Variety on a subject of some note in Hollywood all the more telling. Ramsey was asked about the subject of gender-neutral awards in Hollywood. This is what they said:

“I don’t have the answer and I wish that there was something that was an easy way around it, but I think that it’s really important that we have a female category and a male category,” Ramsey said, adding that it’s important that ‘recognition for women in the industry is preserved.”

Even though Ramsey does not identify as a female and says being labeled as an ‘actress’ does not feel quite right, they are comfortable being put in the actress category at the Emmys for ‘The Last of Us’. At least for now.

“I have a guttural, ‘That’s not quite right instinct to (being called an actress) Ramsey said. “But I just don’t take it too seriously…it doesn’t feel like an attack on my identity.” (italics for emphasis).

This response shows a maturity beyond Ramsey's years and is a start contrast to the attitude of another non-binary performer Liv Hewson of Yellowjackets. When it came to Emmy seasons Hewson refused to submit under any genre and made it clear "there's no place for me in Hollywood."

I've had my issues with the politics of today's Hollywood more often then I can count so I have to say I truly wish that more performers had the class and maturity of Sweeney and Ramsey then the attitude of Wood and Hewson. Wood can't take even the idea of being torn down as a joke but has no problem doing the same thing to someone in the theater of social media. Hewson wants to tear down the system that's given them a place because they won't fit their standards to the industry at the expense of all others.  Sweeney and Ramsey are acting like grownups and many in the industry have chosen to bully Sweeney because she won't toe the party line. Ramsey's a different case but I can't imagine that Asia Kate Dillons and the Emma Corrins of the world were thrilled with them when Ramsey made the issue of non-binary awards as far less important as they want it to be.

Hollywood is by far the most visible representation of the left in America but they are also far more out of touch with the rest of America by nature of their wealth and celebrity. By and large they have never seen the contradiction nor the fact that in the age of Trump they have done far more to hurt the causes they advocate for then help them. The last year has made it more clear that they have learned nothing from the results of the 2024 election and if anything are doubling down on positions that the electorate has repeatedly rejected. That this increasingly been damaging their business model is something they have also chosen to ignore.

That Hollywood is increasingly trying to make villains out of its own for choosing to  - gasp! – put entertainment ahead of advocacy and politicking shows how much they themselves have lost sight of their original purpose. Sweeney has made it very clear that she has not lost sight of that and that she has no interest in engaging in the political theatrics of her co-stars and fellow performers.  The fact that she refuses to engage in controversies that by and large are essentially imaginary and creations of Hollywood itself infuriates the various factions of the left, who are increasingly making divisions not on race or gender but on increasing positions that contradict the ones they've had the day before. And by arguing that if you don't take a side, you're taking a side Hollywood is increasingly engaging in the practices that do more and more isolate the left historically.

As someone who really thinks that Hollywood would be better served if it focused on making an entertaining product and left personal politics at the set I find Sweeney's relative high road refreshing. The fact that is pisses off so many people in Hollywood and the left doesn't shock me: as I've said the left lives in a stage of perpetual rage and Hollywood thinks that they are the center of the universe because they have cameras on them half the time. Sometimes an ad for jeans is just an ad for jeans. And for the record if  you're fine with the kind of sexual depravity that goes on in the average minute on Euphoria but Sweeney doing something with her clothes on is a bridge too far, honestly I'm not sure you can lecture anyone about personal morals.  I mean every time you see Sweeney onscreen in near nudity and you can only picture her in American Eagle jeans…that's a really weird kind of moral standard.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment