Tuesday, January 29, 2019

SMILF Season 2 Review


One of the nicer surprises of 2017 (particularly given the level of the network) was Showtime’s SMILF. Almost entirely springing from the mind of Frankie Shaw, it dealt a single, twenty-ish mother raising a toddler on the Southside of Boston. Bridget quickly moved away from the level of heroines we tend to see in Showtime series to an engaging and positive woman trying to find her own way with her family and friends. The first season played very well, but we’ve had to wait entire calendar year for Shaw to come up with Season 2. It’s not as worth as the wait for Atlanta was, but it’s nearly as engaging.
For those who were uncomfortable with the acronym of the series last year, Shaw has changed it to stand for ‘Single Mom Is Losing Faith’. And Bridget has every reason to be this season. She spent a good chunk of last year trying to track down her abusive father, and this year she ends up finding that he has died without her ever able to confront him. Even worse, her stepfather, one of the few positive influences in her life, committed suicide in the season premiere, inadvertently dying in front of her son. This has come as a body blow to her mother Tootie (Rosie O’Donnell finally seems to have hit the sweet spot for the character she spent most year building up), who has always had mental issues, and has now started to swing towards genuine melancholy.
Indeed, everybody around Frankie seems to be sinking quite a bit. Ally (Connie Britton) the affluent mother who Bridget worked for as a tutor/babysitter learned in the premiere that her husband was cheating on her. Last night, she seemed to be in a level of despair as well on her birthday, which ended in a surreal scene with Bridget where she rehearsed what she would tell her husband, did Xanax with Bridget, and ended up firing her. The final scene ended in a montage which wouldn’t have been out of place in Atlanta where Bridget went into a church, had a very druggy conversation with the Virgin Mary (“you got such a raw deal”) and ended up trying to steal one of the icons from the church.
The level of sleaze that I initially feared SMILF would have when I initially reviewed it, is there to a degree – the second episode opens with her bathing in a tub of milk to get rid of a rash. But there’s a genuine sense of optimism and something to admire about Bridget and most of the characters on this series that has been painfully lacking in so many of the series on Showtime. It might be an exaggeration to mention it in the same breath as Atlantait’s good, but nowhere near as good – but it does have many of the same principle – that of the poverty driven people trying to get by in a society that has mainly passed them by. The fact that so many of the stars and creative forces behind it are women is something to be appreciated as well.
It’s not a perfect series. The show still has a ways to go when it comes to balancing the characters. Raffi and Nelson, Bridget’s baby daddy and girlfriend haven’t really appeared to their full potential yet, and the series is still struggling to find a way to adequately use Raven Goodwin, who has now been promoted to series regular. But much like its plucky heroine, SMILF grows on you with each successive episode. And unlike the title character, with each episode I’m gaining faith.
My score: 4 stars.

Saturday, January 26, 2019

Deadwood Episode Guide: Deadwood


Written by David Milch
Directed by Walter Hill

Unlike The Sopranos, which was the first major series with an antihero lead, or The Wire, where Simon would make it very clear that the central character was Baltimore, Deadwood had two characters that were at the center of the series. And it is significant that while the lead character of the series is Al Swearengen, the first character we meet is Seth Bullock. It is also critical that the opening scene takes place in Montana where Bullock is among to fulfill his last deed as Marshal – the hanging of Clell Watson.  The scene plays like the opening scene of many Westerns – a conversation between the lawman and his prisoner, (if, of course, you subtracted the significant amount of profanities). Watson talks to Bullock about how he was going to Deadwood, that there’s no law at all, that he just had some bad luck, and then gently tries to prod Bullock into letting him go, and absently offering him a bribe.
Then Sol Star enters the scene, and everything changes. There’s a drunken mob gathering that wants to see Watson hung now, and they are perfectly content to go through him to get it done.  Gunfire starts, and then we go outside. Bullock then comes out, dragging Watson, and memorably says: “He’s hanging under letter of the law”. He then lets Watson dictate final remarks to his sister, assures him “he’ll help him with the drop” and Watson finally yells out: “FUCK YOU!” before jumping and Bullock does what he’s told. He then takes down what Watson just said, asks “who’ll give word to his sister”, hands the note and his badge to one of the suddenly shame-faced mob, and rides off. And with that, we know we’re not watching John Ford. And before we set even one foot into Deadwood proper, we know we’re not in Monument Valley.
Yes, there’s a lot of swearing – a dozen ‘fucks’, a couple ‘cocksuckers’, and half a dozen other stray curses. Not much by what’s going to come later, but it was a big deal coming in 2004, which started Milch on his long explanation tour for critics. But mainly, there’s the dialogue in general. Walter Hill is one of the more established directors in film, who had quite a few Westerns under his belt, so it was a big get that Milch got him to direct the Pilot. Milch deferred to him when it was shot, but halfway through the season, it became clear just how critical dialogue was going to be to this series, so the scene between Watson and Bullock was reshot. And then there’s the fact that Bullock could’ve just stepped aside and let the lynching happen – it was literally his last day before retirement – but his choice to step in as executioner is both a meaningless distinction and absolutely critical. Deadwood is about imposing order into chaos, bringing law to lawlessness, and the grey area of the camp as they wait to be legally absorbed into the United States and, by definition, civilization. If Bullock lets the mob win, they finish stringing up Watson and looking forward to doing it when the next bastard breaks the law – or maybe just for the hell of it. Done Bullock’s way, it shames every drunk son of a bitch in that crowd (there’s a reason for Watson’s last defiant words), reminds them of the cost of taking a life, and maintains the veneer of civilization, which, in mere minutes, we will learn is completely absent in Deadwood.
Two months pass before Star and Bullock arrive in the camp to set up a hardware store. Before we get a look at the town we will basically be spending the entire series in, we meet two more critical, historical characters. Wild Bill Hickok is arriving in town, led by his fellow rider Calamity Jane.  We get a few things clear almost immediately. Wild Bill is the world-weary gunslinger, but the first time we meet him, he is prone, and looking not unlike a dead body. He seems to be getting by more on his legend then his actual ability. Jane is clearly in love with him, even though it’s made clear soon after that Bill has new wife.  We also meet Charlie Utter, who seems more determined to keep his friend alive, and it’s pretty clear that this isn’t something Hickok is interested in. His first goal upon riding into town is to find a saloon, and to find a place to play poker. Charlie immediately tries to set up what could be considered a finder’s fee for Nutall (who owns of the three major saloons we will see in the series), but he knows that most of it “Bill’s just going to piss away.”
When Seth and Sol find themselves a spot, they’re told to pay their fee to Al Swearengen at the Gem. Swearengen is then seen working out a line of credit for Ellsworth, a bearded prospector who is in the process of getting liquored up. He then delivers one of the most famous early lines:

“I may have fucked up my life up flattered than hammered shit but I stand here today beholden to no human cocksucker and working a paying fucking gold claim – and not the US government saying I’m trespassing or the Savage fucking Red Man himself or any of these limber-dicked cocksuckers passing themselves off as prospectors had better try and stop me.”

The amount of profanity in that dialogue is indeed awe-inspiring, and it tells you more about Ellsworth than fifty pages in a novel.
Swearengen appears perfectly benign, but the second we here a gunshot, he changes personalities like putting on a coat. The second he gets upstairs, and finds one of his whores standing next to a john with a hole in his head that she put there, his reaction is to grab Trixie by her arm, and demand the “Doc” show up.
Swearengen then watches Trixie desperately trying to explain herself to her pimp, a man she knows will kill her, not because she killed a man, but because she didn’t ask him for help and because she caused the possibility of trouble.  He then beats rather severely (with Trixie’s haunting words – “I’ll be good” And then she asks Jewel – the mentally deficient gimp who sweeps the floors to get her another derringer.
We are so scaled to accept certain Western clichés that at this point we simply think Trixie is either a simple prostitute being victimized by her pimp. But we will soon realize there are layers to this relationship that we have yet to fully grasp.
Very quickly, we begin to see that Swearengen has a hierarchy among the camp. Dan Dority is clearly his trusted soldier, utterly loyal, offering his opinion, but willing to follow his orders however ruthless. Next is E.B. Farnum, one of the most memorable characters, whose initial appearance is that of a rodent, and is probably the least respected character in the entire series. Slightly lower down is Johnny Burns, younger and slower-witted, but who nevertheless trust Swearengen implicitly.  Trixie would seem to be at the bottom of this totem pole (the fact that he refers to her as a ‘loopy fucking c—t’ after she shoots her trick would seem to indicate this) but there’s a level of trust there that becomes clear.
In the midst of all this we see Al trying to run a con on the ‘dude’ Brom Garrett. Brom seems the quintessential Eastern rube playing cowboy, who nobody respects, not even his wife. We don’t see much of Alma, and we do she seems mainly in the process of getting high, but she seems to have a slighter a bit of cunning that her husband clearly doesn’t respect.
The critical story for the second half of the episode is the only thing that you might find on a traditional. A lone rider shows up down saying that he saw an entire family massacred on the Spearfish Road – the Metz family, who we see leaving the town as Wild Bill rides in.  The Metzs are the only traditional family we will see in the entire series, and the fact that they are slaughtered this quickly demonstrates what kind of place Deadwood is.
It is critical to Deadwood that we consider Bullock and Swearengen reaction to this slaughter. Bullock may have hung up his sheriff’s badge, but he is still a cop. He convinces the man to get drink, guides him to Nutall’s saloon, and manages to get him to acknowledge that there might be someone alive out there. Sol then shames the crowd – and most importantly, Hickok – into forcing him to ride out there, and he and Hickok have a whispered conversation in which they say the man’s story doesn’t add up. After they find the child, and ride back into town, after he’s left with the Doc, Bullock looks at the man, and basically tells him that he and his group massacred the kid. Hickok walks beside him, and when the man tries to run, they both fire. This is the only traditional gunplay we’ll see in the series, and it’s one of the few moments Wild Bill seems truly awake and alive.
Swearengen, by contrast, gets pissed when the news breaks in the Gem, because everybody’s stirred up, and the night’s profit margin is being eaten up. He then goes downstairs, and talks everybody in the gem out of riding out that night, putting a $50 on anyone who brings a decapitated Indian head, and reducing prices on the next round. However, there’s far more to it – like Bullock, he doesn’t believe these were Indians, and he knows the names of the people who may have done it – and that seems to be one of the reasons “He’s got a lot on his mind.”
There’s a lot going on in the Pilot, and in the tradition of Deadwood, we’ll get to chasing down the other threads later in the guide. But the one thing I can’t omit is one of the men Hickok meets in the saloon – Jack McCall. He says he’s not impressed by Hickok, and that he plans to gut the sonofabitch at poker. From the start, he seems determined to bait Wild Bill, and one can’t help but think an earlier Hickok would’ve shot him quicker. Two things come to mind: McCall seems like a detached hanger-on, and Hickok seems to know he’s courting danger – and doesn’t seem to care.
The opening episode of Deadwood is a difficult series to get your mind around now, much less fifteen years ago. But the critical characters of the series seem to establish themselves in minutes. No doubt part of this is do to Milch’s genius as a writer, but credit must go to Ian MacShane, Timothy Olyphant, Keith Carradine, Robin Weigert, W. Earl Brown, Jim Beaver, and John Hawkes. A lot of the characters – particularly the women – are mere sketches at this point, but I have a feeling much of this is by design – at this stage, even Milch would’ve confessed “he didn’t understand women”. But you get the feeling straight on of being in the muck and the mire, which is a level that none of the other Westerns even came close to realize.

Friday, January 25, 2019

Brooklyn Nine-Nine Is Back! And It's Still Hysterical


I generally loved Brooklyn Nine-Nine when it was on Fox. While I watched it more or less consistently over its first two seasons, when it started moving around on the schedule, I didn’t follow it nearly as closely. When I watched it, I still found it one of the funniest and most original workplace comedies in TV, but I didn’t watch it enough. I’m not saying that I was responsible for Fox pulling the plug, but I didn’t help.
And then NBC – no doubt pulled by the outpouring of so many fans – decided to pick it up for a sixth season, and I decided: What the hell, it’s on right before The Good Place, I might as well see if its still as good as I remember. It’s not. It’s better.
Oh, a lot has changed. Jake Peralta (Andy Samberg) has married his soul mate Amy (Melissa Fumero). (I’m sorry I missed the Die Hard themed wedding after the wonderful Halloween five proposal.) Blissfully sarcastic Rosa (Stephanie Beatriz) has become bisexual, and Gina is leaving the precinct (NOOOO!!!) But, very little has changed. Captain Holt is still in charge and deadpan. (If you’d told me five years that Andre Braugher would be such a gifted comedian, I’d been as emotional as Holt gets in my disbelief.) Terry is still in charge, and freakishly big. And Hitchcock and Scully are still incompetent.
Rather the comedy remains in all the small details that make this series one of the most imaginative shows that I’ve ever seen. When Jake and Amy went on their honeymoon, Amy tried to reenact one of Jake’s greatest fantasies by dressing up as Holly Gennaro. Naturally, it was interrupted by Holt showing up saying he was quitting the police force, and it ended up with Amy berating Holt, while he was hogtied to the bed, saying: “I don’t give a hoot about you any more!” Holt took this as a charge, and has determined to help the Nine-Nine, which has gone to war with the Commissioner.  After five years of wondering how the biggest slobs on the unit backstory was, we finally learned Hitchcock and Scully’s story in the 80s – and, boy did we get a shock. Apparently, they were so ripped that Boyle and Jake could only ask: “What happened to those guys?”
And last night, we got a look at Jake and Gina’s twentieth high school reunion, where Jake tried to rid himself of a reputation as ‘The Tattler’, which everybody in his senior thought he was. Naturally, Amy tried to help him, and revealed just what a lovable geek she is. (She ended the night writing a book report for Jane Eyre.) Gina lied to everybody she met, nearly landed a Silicon Valley deal for an app called Toddler, and then had to deal with the fact that she had just been lied too. Meanwhile, Boyle tried to use the patented ‘Boyle decision making process’ to help Rosa choose between two lovers (it ended with her hanging from the ceiling like a bat – “the most decisive of all animals) and Holt and Terry getting involved in a ridiculous radio contest that somehow taught Holt the beauties of wasting time at work. It was ridiculous, profound, and very silly – in short, it was a quintessential night for the Nine-Nine.
If there’s a flaw in Brooklyn Nine-Nine, it’s that the series seems to follow a formula that was not uncommon in Parks & Recreation (co-creator Michael Shur’s earlier triumph for NBC), in which the series manages to partner people in the squad with the ideal soulmate, whether they work with them or not. But in a cynical age, I actually find it endearing. Michael Shur is one of the great creative forces for comedy in the Golden Age – this is the third exceptional series he has created this decade (why did you break my heart with the season finale of The Good Place?) This is arguably a Barney Miller for my generation, and  the best work-related comedy since Scrubs. I don’t know how long this series will last on its home, but at this point, any new adventures with the precinct are just gravy – and a pure delight.
My score: 4.75 stars.

Monday, January 21, 2019

Is Time Still A Flat Circle? The Return of True Detective


When True Detective premiered in January of 2014, it was hailed as one of the most incredible accomplishments television had managed to produce in years. Powered by extraordinary performances by Matthew McConaughey and Woody Harrelson and featuring superb direction by Cary Fukimaja, it seemed to set the bar high of television in general. Its presence almost certainly helped McConaughey win an Academy Award a few months later, and even when the ending to the mystery came as anticlimactic, critics everywhere were in awe of it.
Then the second season aired in June of 2015, and it was so dreadfully written and poorly acted (which considering it had such powerhouses as Colin Farrell and Rachel McAdams in its cast, is really saying something), that the same people who rhapsodized the first season couldn’t hail down enough expletives to curse the second. In that years Emmys, Andy Samberg made some very telling jokes about it saying: “We said goodbye to True Detective even though it’s still on the air.” Truer words were never spoken. The series disappeared for more than three years, and the fact that it has returned may be due to HBO’s desperation for known quantities rather than any faith in the actual property.
Trying to figure out whether Season 3 of True Detective works is going to be a hard story to figure out even for those who those who know nothing about the series first two installations.  One can’t help but thing that maybe Nic Polazzo, in his determination to try and find his way back, decided to use the first season as a road map more than trying to come up with something different.  Once again, the series is set back in the South – Arkansas this time – and once again, it involves a detective trying to look back on a ritualistic homicide that was resolved in the past. The major difference is the lead – Wayne Hays  played by Oscar-winner Mahershala Ali, the first African-American to have a role of any significance in this series. And the story is being told in three time periods – the original crime which Hays investigated in 1980, the reopening of the case in 1990, and Hays being re-interviewed for a true crime drama in 2015.
Let’s consider what about the series works this time. There is the flowing between time periods, usually with Hays at the center. It is clear that in the present Wayne is dealing with some major memory issues, and that is causing him to black out and seriously consider suicide.  The flowing between the three major time periods works surprisingly well, considering that there is a very good possibility for an incredible amount of confusion.  And the acting is definitely a lot better than it was in Season 2. Ali has very quickly demonstrated that he is one of the great actors working today. We get a clear perspective of him in all three periods, a detective desperate to solve the case in 1980,  a slightly burned out husband and father looking for redemption in 1990, and a man still trying to get closure while worried about the lost of his mind in the present. He commands the screen in  a way that very few actors can.
But he’s not the whole story. Stephen Dorff,  a criminally undervalued actor who has never gotten the credit for his work, plays Roland West, Hays’ partner in 1980, who has to serve as a buffer for people and brass who don’t want to listen to a black man ask sensitive questions. Something will happen because of this case that will get him promoted to lieutenant, but its clear he still has genuine admiration for his former partner. Also good is Carmen Ejojo as Amelia, a school teacher in 1980, who is of interest early on, and will become Wayne’s wife, the mother of his children, and a writer of a true crime book about the investigation. She is the first fully drawn female character in this entire anthology series
Its where we get to the investigation itself that things start to bog down. It involves the disappearance of two children. One is founded murdered, and placed in a ritualistic position. The younger daughter disappeared, and is clearly presumed dead. And its clear that the parents (Scoot McNairy and Mamie Gummer) aren’t telling all their secrets. Something in the investigation will go wrong, and we will later find out that the daughter is alive. Something will go wrong again. What does the woman interviewing Hays know? Frankly, she’s so irritating and much of a social justice warrior that its hard to care. More importantly, this particular plot line follows Season 1 so closely that it’s kind of hard to imagine Polazzo had to work this hard to come with it. And the characters have so much built in bigotry and sexism that one begins to wonder just what Polazzo’s views are.
Now, don’t get me wrong. True Detective’s third season is very good as a work of television. Ali and Dorff in particular are brilliant, and one can easily see them being at the forefront of the Best Limited Series Acting Emmys. But its beginning to seem less like True Detective is a groundbreaking piece of television, and more just another anthology series. That’s not necessarily a bad thing – we can always use a couple more of those. But for those of us who remembered Cohle and Harte discussing whether or not time was a flat circle, it’s just a little disappointing.
My Score: 4 stars.

Saturday, January 19, 2019

A Lie Agreed Upon: Deadwood Episode Guide - Prologue


When one looks at the origins of the Golden Age of Television, one must begin with HBO. Specifically, with the Holy Trinity of Davids: Chase, Simon, and Milch. Though Oz served as the spark, we would not regard television the way to do today without the three series that they created: The Sopranos, by Chase; The Wire, and Deadwood, by David Milch.
I approached all three series in different ways. The Sopranos I got into at the beginning, but the longer it aired I got more and more frustrated at it, because the characters were unpleasant and didn’t evolve. Of course, not having read Chase’s interviews on the subject, I didn’t realize that was the point: change is hard, and given the choice, people will always take the path of least resistance.
The Wire I got into during Season 2, and was instantly captivated. There’s a very good chance I may have missed the point initially here as well; I believed it was a brilliant portrait of urban decay combined with police procedural; it wasn’t until the last season that I realized that it was really about the death of the American Dream, and the breakdown of social institutions.
But with Deadwood, I didn’t start watching it until after the series was over. I’d never been much of a fan of the Western as TV or movie, and I had no idea what David Milch’s connection to television was. Even if I had been, I probably would’ve been discouraged; I generally considered NYPD Blue one of the more overrated police dramas, and I didn’t know his connection to Hill Street Blues at all. I didn’t know the history behind the series, and I probably might’ve even preferred Six Feet Under at the time.
But time has helped heal these wounds, and I now realize just how great a series Deadwood was, and how tragic it was that it was cut short without getting the proper ending. But now that we are finally, after nearly twelve years of waiting, about to receive closure in the form of a TV movie, I thought now would be the time to take a look at this classic series.
Because Deadwood is unlike any show, I have ever tried to review; I think we need a bit of history. And so we basically have to start with the creator. Also a warning: Deadwood is one of the most profane shows the medium has ever aired. In order to do justice to it, I’m going to have to quote a lot of it. So if you are easily offended – well, you probably wouldn’t have gotten this guide in the first place. Anyways, let’s get started.

Any story of Deadwood has to begin with David Milch, who is clearly one of the mediums greatest writers. He has battled with addiction most of his life, he was a degenerate gambler and alcoholic, he studied and wrote under Robert Penn Warren, he was a fraternity brother of George W. Bush. All of which probably gave him more than adequate preparation for writing for television. Television, however, wasn’t quite ready for Milch.
Milch’s first script was for Hill Street Blues, the classic episode ‘Trial By Fire’, where Frank Furillo basically uses the threat of a lynch mob to get a man to confess to the murder of a nun – something that makes him end the episode in confession. Milch was never quite able to be a good fit for the upright Furillo, so as the series left Steven Bochco’s control and passed into Milch’s, he would begin to dealing with the early shades of what would be considered the antihero. In Hill Street, these early muses would be played by Dennis Franz, first  Bundetto, a murdering, degenerate cop; then Norman Buntz, a man who played with a looser deck of rules.
The series where Milch had the most influence was NYPD Blue. Initially a series that seemed to generate response by how far it could push network standards for profanity and nudity, Milch would eventually use to tell more stories about the life and loves of police. By the end of the second season, the show didn’t exactly have teleplays anymore. Milch would lie on the floor of the writers room for hours, and a typist would scroll through the script. Milch would make changes line by line, and sometimes word by word. The writer of the episode would get his name on the script, but the bulk of the words, and more important their order, came from Milch.
The language, over time, would become more stylized and contorted, and I have to be honest, that’s part of the reason I never got into the series. As I said in an earlier guide, the characters on NYPD Blue always sounded like they were characters in a police drama. The characters in Homicide and The Wire, by contrast, sounded like police. And if it could be frustrating to watch, it was often frustrating for the actors reciting the dialogue. Dennis Franz and Gordon Clapp managed to handle it the best (both actors would win multiple Emmys for their work) and other actors, like Jimmy Smits, would become frustrated, particularly considering that the longer the series was on the air, the more convoluted the rewriting process got, with actors often not receiving scripts until the day of shooting. Indeed, the death of Smits’ character Bobby Simone, one of the most memorable series exits in the history of television, was caused because Smits just could not deal with the process anymore.
Eventually, the process would exhaust even Milch. By the end of his seventh season, his presence and writing would become even more erratic, with him finally given actors their lines the day of shootings. He left Blue at the end of Season 7, and though he would try to duplicate his success with series like Brooklyn South and Big Apple, neither would last very long.
So, in 2002, he came up with an idea for a series. He pitched to HBO the idea of a police drama set in Ancient Rome. Two centurions were going to arrest St. Paul, and he intended to tell the story of how the rise of any civilization corresponds with the rise of law and order to protect that civilization. He went to lunch with Chris Albrech6 and Carolyn Strauss, the heads of programming for HBO. They loved the pitch. Problem was, they had a show in development called Rome, by another great writer John Milius
(In one of the great ironies of television, Rome wouldn’t see the light of day until 2006, just after the cancellation of Deadwood. Loved and appreciated by critics, it would be cancelled after two seasons for much of the same reasons Deadwood would be.)
So Milch decided to make a western. One that would be set in the town of Deadwood, South Dakota, and focus around three historical characters who would be there around the same time: Wild Bill Hickok, the legendary gunslinger, Al Swearengen, owner of the Gem Saloon, and Seth Bullock, the town’s first sheriff. He would populate the town with other characters, historical and fictional; populate it with actors who have become stalwarts of the new Golden Age, and turn out some of the most memorable dialogue in the history of television.
Many things make Deadwood unique, even among its fellow works of drama on HBO. For one thing, there is the amount of profanity. This was nothing new to HBO dramas – the level of obscenities on The Sopranos were part of what had drawn critics and viewers to the series in the first place, and The Wire used it so well that one of the great scenes in television history was basically three and a half minutes of Bunk and McNulty just using variations on the F-word to reconstruct a murder. What forced to Milch to explain to critics who screened the pilot was the fact that people in the 19th century were using the same kind of obscenities that you heard gangsters and drug slingers use. Even after he did so, there were still quite a few people (and I have to admit, I was one of them) who just didn’t believe him. However, I’ve since seen documentation of coarse remarks that were forbidden to be use to shout at umpires and baseball players in roughly the same time period. And considering that most of those fans were from the so-called ‘genteel class’, I have absolutely no difficulty believing that miners and prostitutes used that kind of language.
But the fact is I mostly didn’t care. Because the mix of obscenity and Milch’s tendency to alter the order of words for that dialogue seemed to come together to form a kind of poetry that I’d never heard on any television series before, and have yet to hear since. And in that sense, I am inclined to agree that only Milch could’ve written this kind of show.
Even more astonishing was the way the series was shot. Unlike The Wire and The Sopranos, Deadwood was filmed almost entirely on a single set – the ranch where Gene Autry westerns were once filmed, of all places. And most of the outdoor shots were full of filth and muck. But unlike Oz, which was also filmed largely on a single set, Deadwood never seemed claustrophobic. It seemed a lot like we were at the beginnings of something big. Even more astonishing was the time period of each season. Each episode usually seemed to take place over the course of a single day: the average season being over a period of weeks. It would seem hard to even consider that there could be much character growth over that period, but there would be quite a bit (at least among some of them).
And unlike far too many of the series even in the Golden Age, Deadwood would be one of the first fully realize the level of fully developed female characters. This is particularly remarkable when even Milch admitted that he didn’t ‘understand women’. But few who saw Robin Weigert’s portrayal of Calamity Jane will ever forget it, and most of the other women, though fictionalized, were just as fascinating, particularly in the portrayal of prostitutes, played by two exceptional actresses: Paula Malcolmson as Trixie, and Kim Dickens as Joanie Stubbs. (We’ll get to the others in a bit.)
And all of this is even more astonishing when you consider just how Deadwood was being made in the first place.  The process for creating scripts had even fewer boundaries than did for NYPD Blue. Milch had fewer limits and no advertisers to answer to. There were scripts for the first four episodes of Season 1, and after that, most of the series was written on the fly, with the cast and crew not learning what they would be doing until the day before. The writers would gather early in the morning, talking about where they were going with the episode (a lot of the talk had nothing to do with anything, one writer said) and out of those conversations would come decisions on what scenes to write that day, with the cast to be informed the next day. The actors would often be given scenes out of context with the rest of the episode. You’d expect people to get nervous and angry about this, if not downright revolt. But not even the HBO executives complained. As for the actors – well, let Jim Beaver, who memorably portrayed Ellsworth sum it up:
“It’s one of the joys (and terrors) of working for David Milch, having to use only the scene at hand as guide for who you are and what your attitude is. Since scenes are often filmed out of order, if you add the absence of complete scripts to the circumstance, there simply is no strong guide for one’s sense of character beyond trusting the scene and the fact that David will correct you if you’re on the wrong heading. It’s no wonder that some actors might have difficulty with his process. But I thrilled in it. It was like going over Niagara in a barrel every morning, with all the fear intact, yet with a subdued voice in my whispering ‘David won’t let you die.’”
And it worked. I didn’t know any of this until years after I saw the series and knowing that much of this brilliant work was basically improvisation – well, this puts Mike Leigh and Christopher Guest to shame. Knowing this, it’s almost astonishing that Deadwood isn’t ranked as well as the two other series of the troika. Part of it no doubt has to do with the third season, part of it that it ended abruptly – but despite all that, it remains a work of art.
So, with that in mind, we’ll begin to look at a Western unlike any other Western and a HBO drama unlike any HBO drama.

Monday, January 14, 2019

My Critics Choices were not Far Off: Reaction to the Broadcast Critics



As I mentioned last week, I was deeply afraid that I would miss the Critics Choice Award because of a conflict between Spectrum and Tribune that basically took channel 11 off the map for the month of January. And then, Friday afternoon – miracle of miracles. Channel 11 and its subsidiaries were back. I don’t know who blinked or what the consequences may be, and frankly, I don’t care – I got to see my awards show.
Usually, after all this buildup, I was deeply afraid it would come as an anticlimax. But in a rare exception, especially after how disappointing it was last year, the actual ceremony was superb. Partly it was due to the fact that the CW decided to give it a full three hours this year – they  still had to edit out some awards, but they do that anyway. But mainly, it was because the awards and the presentation were so well done. The presenters were genuinely more engaged than they were last year – Olivia Munn was more entertaining in presenting Best Limited Series than she was hosting last year. All of the presenters were remarkably self-deprecating and charming. My personal favorite of the night was watching those old pros Catherine O’Hara and Eugene Levy come out to present, and spend nearly a minute reciting – in movie trailer fashion – all of the comments the critics tend to give in captions referring to themselves, until they were nearly played off stage. (Note to Emmys and Oscars: let them host.)
But, as always, the awards themselves were probably the most entertaining part, and I was right there with them for a lot of them. I was over the moon that The Americans did better than just about any other series of the night – it more than deserved to be listed as Best Drama, and Matthew Rhys and Noah Emmerich more than deserved to triumph in the male acting categories. (I only wish I could have seen them speak; Rhys wasn’t there, and Emmerich’s award was announced along with most of the Supporting Awards.) Sandra Oh has more than proved herself worthy (and good that she remember to thank Jodie Comer this time) and Thandie Newton was definitely worth the time.
I’m slightly disappointed that the Comedy Awards basically followed the Emmys this year. I know that’s not quite true – Marvelous Mrs. Maisel and its female leads, Rachel Brosnahan and Alex Borstein won for the second season, but still it showed a certain lack of creativity. Likewise Bill Hader and Henry Winkler prevailing for Barry – it’s not that I don’t see the logic of it, but since you have been more eclectic in the past, why not recognize Atlanta or The Good Place instead? The latter series, especially, needs all the help it can get.
The Limited Series were also a duplicate of the Golden Globes with one key exception. As I’ve mentioned, one of the reasons this awards show is my favorite is because it has ties a lot of the time. And the one in Best Actress in a Limited Series wasn’t even the biggest shock of the night – but I was thrilled to see that Patricia Arquette, who more than deserved her triumph shared the award with the equally worthy Amy Adams for Sharp Objects. Both were very self-effacing – Adams came up to the stage first, and then rather than give her speech, asked for them to read Arquette’s name out. The two embraced on the stage, and more or less, split giving their speeches in concert. It was endearing, and I was especially glad for Adams who seems to be going mostly hungry this awards season. I was satisfied with the rest of the awards in this category as well.
And it was interesting to see Chuck Lorre, creator of such great series as Mom, The Big Bang Theory, and co-writer of so many other great series get a special award. The Bog Bang Theory crew introduced it by finally dealing with something that has no doubt frustrated millions for decades – the vanity card at the end of each series episode that contain many, many funny jokes, if you could record them and pause at the right time. Not easy when he started doing them in the late 90s, still difficult now. They actually read out some of the best jokes Lorre  has written that we never heard. We actually got an explanation of sorts, as to why he wrote them. And his actual speech –considering all the crap he’s been through – was relatively modest and surprisingly moving. He might be getting humble as he ages. Who’d have thought?
Admittedly, this year’s Critics Choice didn’t give much of foreshadowing for the Emmys as it usually does. But I generally think that many of the winners were the right ones. Which the Emmys doesn’t often do, and its still fun to watch.


Friday, January 11, 2019

My Picks For This Year's Critics Choice: Part 3, Limited Series/Movie


BEST LIMITED SERIES
Escape at Dannemora and Sharp Objects are strong series, but just like two years ago, when the first installment of American Crime Story dominated these awards, it seems a sure thing that The Assassination of Gianni Versace will be just as dominant. The Golden Globes were in favor of it last week, they’ll be just as generous here.
Should Win/Will Win: Assassination of Gianni Versace.

BEST ACTOR,  TV MOVIE OR LIMITED SERIES
This is a trickier category than the Golden Globes. Benicio Del Toro and Paul Dano gave superb performances in Escape at Dannemora, but the odds are they’ll cancel each other out. Hugh Grant might prevail for A Very English Scandal. But in the end, it looks like Darren Criss will continue his hot streak. And of all the reprobates in this category, his was by far the most fascinating.
Should Win/Will Win: Criss.

BEST ACTRESS IN A TV MOVIE OR LIMITED SERIES
Basically the same field as the Golden Globes in which Patricia Arquette triumphed last week – with one major exception. Carrie Coon, nominated for her fine work as the cult leader at the center of USA’s The Sinner, gave an exceptional performance, and the Broadcast Critics have a tendency to be favorable to her in categories with strong female leads. (This is her fourth nomination in as many years.) I think there is a legitimate chance she could prevail here, but let’s be honest – all of the nominees in this category gave great performances. I’ll give the barest of edges to Arquette, whose work was literally transformative, but there are no losers here.
Should Win: Arquette.
Will Win: Coon/Arquette (but they’re all good).

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR IN A TV MOVIE OR LIMITED SERIES
Like I said before, you can’t really handicap these categories well. Ben Whishaw’s triumph at the Golden Globes for A Very English Scandal might give him a slight edge, but this is a different category. Eric Lange and Finn Wittrock both gave great performances that might be able to register an upset here.
My personal preference is for Lange, whose work as the buffoonish, cuckolded, and yet ultimately faithful husband deserves to be acknowledged as much as the three leads. But I’ll give the barest of edges to Whishaw.
Should Win: Lange.
Will Win: Whishaw.

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS IN A TV MOVIE OR LIMITED SERIES
Here we might she a shift. Patricia Clarkson more than deserved to win for her work in Sharp Objects, but there’s a real chance that Elizabeth Perkins might siphon away a votes from here. One could definitely see the same thing happening between Penelope Cruz and Judith Light in the Assassination of Gianni Versace. Could this lead to an upset by Ellen Burstyn or Julia Garner? Possibly, but it’s doubtful.
In the end, I think it will go to Cruz by the barest of edges. Her performance was really as transformative as Arquette’s was, and has been seriously lacking in acknowledgement in the awards market. This is the last chance to honor her, and I think she’ll prevail.
Should Win: Clarkson.
Will Win: Cruz.

The strike is over! Hallelujah! See you Monday with my reaction to the awards.

Thursday, January 10, 2019

My Picks For This Year's Critics Choice, Part 2: Comedies


BEST COMEDY SERIES
Now that The Kominsky Method won the Golden Globe, it has to be considered one of the major contenders. However, the competition is harsher here with Atlanta, one of the best series of last year in the category, as well as The Middle, a series that this group has loved and may want to honor.
I still think The Good Place deserves to win for its consistent excellence. But Atlanta is a far deeper and more engaging series that was basically ignored by the Emmys. I’m thinking that this year, the Critics, who have been advocating for it, will recognize it.
Should Win: The Good Place.
Will Win: Atlanta.

BEST ACTOR IN A COMEDY
Michael Douglas is facing, if anything, even tougher competition than he did at the Globes. Danson, last year’s winner, has been nearly as good this year, and Glover deserves to get recognize as well. Frankly, so should Andy Samberg, and the Critics have really liked Brooklyn Nine-Nine.
This is an ever tougher category to plumb than before, and I do know this is an organization that occasionally has ties.  I think it comes down to a choice between Glover and Danson, and I’m going to give Glover the barest of edges.
Should Win: Glover/Danson.
Will Win: Glover.

BEST ACTRESS IN A COMEDY
Could Rachel Brosnahan do that rarest of feats, and duplicate her win last year? She did at the Golden Globes, but the competition is a bit tougher here.
Let’s work backwards. Allison Janney has drunk from this well a little too often, and Justina Machado hasn’t exactly been loved by this group. Debra Messing lingers as a dark horse, but I think the nomination will count for more. I think it will come down to a showdown between the two hyphenates in this category, Rachel Bloom for Crazy Ex-Girlfriend and Issa Rae for Insecure. I’d like to see Bloom prevail because, well, I love everything she does. But Rae is just as talented and nearly as fun. I give her the barest of edges, knowing that it’s just as likely the Broadcast Critics will find Brosnahan Marvelous once again.
Should Win: Bloom.
Will Win: Brosnahan/Rae.

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR IN A COMEDY
As I said in a dramas, this is a hard category to try and figure out. All of the nominees, with the possible exception of Hayes, are very worthy. So I’ll try and break this one down by my personal preference.
William Jackson Harper has earned a win for his incredible work as Chidi on The Good Place, though his character would probably have a hard time admitting he’d deserve it. Tony Shalhoub is doing his best work in decades in Marvelous Mrs. Maisel. Henry Winkler deserves to prevail for Barry. And Bryan Tyree Henry has remarkable depth as Paperboy. Oh boy. Eenie, meenie… I’m going to go with Shalhoub, whose exasperated father is one of the few characters on this series who hasn’t been given an award yet.
Should Win: Harper.
Will Win: Shalhoub (possibly)

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS IN A COMEDY
I have a lot less invested in this category then just about all the others, but that doesn’t mean there still might be some fun times with mother and daughter Laurie Metcalf and Zoe Perry competing for the same award. Considering the stink hanging over The Conners, though, I think Metcalf is out of the running.
I may not be interested, but this is just as strong a field. My personal preference would be for Betty Gilpin to prevail for her superb work on GLOW which the Broadcast Critics have strangely chosen to shut out this time around. But I think it more likely it’ll go to an industry veteran  - either Annie Potts for her work on Young Sheldon or Rita Moreno for One Day at a Time. I’ll give the edge to Potts. The Critics like recognizing Big Bang Theory in this category. Absent that, a nominee from  Young Sheldon is the next best thing.
Should Win: Gilpin.
Will Win: Potts (maybe)



Wednesday, January 9, 2019

My Hopes for Critics Choice... Sigh: Part 1, Dramas


As I have mentioned on numerous occasions, I considered the Critics Choice Awards among the most eccentric and enjoyable awards, particularly when it comes to television. I was especially looking forward to it this year, but now it seems that fate has thrown me a curve/
Due to some kind of conflict between Spectrum (my cable provider) and Tribune Networks (the service that provides many channels – among them Channel 11) I am currently not receiving the CW. Oh A & E, why did you surrender the rights to the Broadcast Critics. It’s not like they were doing much better on the CW.
I am hoping they will resolve this before Sunday, but I am not optimistic. This is a great pity, because it now seems the Broadcast Critics will be influential in regard to this year's Oscars as well. Sure, I’ll be able to catch it on streaming or YouTube, but it won’t be the same.
Nevertheless, I will soldier on. It’s always difficult for me to try to handicap the Broadcast Critics as dance to the beat of a drum that makes the HFPA seem rhythmic. But that’s kind of what I find appealing about them. I’ll start with the Dramas.

BEST DRAMA
This is actually a little tougher than the Golden Globes, considering that Better Call Saul and The Good Fight are among the nominees, and that Killing Eve is slowly becoming one of my favorite series. But I think the end result will be the same as the Golden Globes, albeit for different reasons.
The Broadcast Critics have always been generous to The Americans. As I’ve mentioned, they gave it a Best Drama prize a full year before the Emmys even nominated it. And considering its established itself as one of the greatest series of all time. I think it’s going to easily triumph tonight.
Should Win/Will Win: The Americans.

BEST ACTOR, DRAMA SERIES
This is a tougher field than the Golden Globes, particularly considering that Madden surprisingly triumphed for Bodyguard earlier this week, and Bob Odenkirk, who has already won twice in this category, is present. That’s without counting Milo Ventimiglia who may well be a dark horse in this category.
It’s probably going to go to Rhys – every argument I made for him in the Golden Globes applies as much here. Still, I’d be lying if I didn’t say I wasn’t pulling for Bob Odenkirk, who is very close to reaching the same pinnacles that Bryan Cranston did in Better Call Saul.
Should Win: Odenkirk/Rhys
Will Win: Rhys.

BEST ACTRESS, DRAMA
This is even trickier than the field in the Golden Globes. Yes, Oh deservedly triumphed over mostly the same field on Sunday. But she wasn’t competing against someone nearly as good as her – her co-star Jodie Comer, whose work as Villanelle is just as good as Oh’s and maybe even better. They very well could split the vote.
I would like to Maggie Gyllenhaal prevail for her superb work in The Deuce, if only for the season finale. But I think the division will lead to one of the other strong actresses – most like Julia Roberts for her fine work in Homecoming. No matter who wins, it’ll be a great night for women.
Should Win: Comer/Gyllenhaal.
Will Win: Roberts.

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR, DRAMA
These categories are always a lot of fun to watch – usually because the Critics Choice will recognize the underdogs and ignored. Four of the actors in this category are some of my favorite working in television today, and I’d love to see one prevail.
My personal preference is Asia Kate Dillon for their superb work as Taylor on Billions. I know they may not like being qualified in this category, but I’ll take whatever I can get to see them win. That said, my personal preference remains Noah Emmerich for The Americans. For six superb seasons, his work as FBI agent Stan Beaman was one of the most brilliant lights in a great cast. He deserves to win – if for no other reason than his extraordinary work in the confrontation scene in the garage. It’s television history and he deserves to be acknowledged for his part in it.
Should Win: Emmerich.
Will Win: Emmerich.

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS, DRAMA
Another tough category to fathom. It could theoretically go to last year’s Emmy winner, Thandie Newton – she’s won in this category before against tougher competition. But as you can never accurately get Supporting Awards, I’ll go out on a limb.
Holly Taylor’s work as Paige was a  master class of acting, particularly in the final season, and I’d like to see her prevail. But there’s another unrecoginized talent in this category whose more than earned it. Rhea Seehorn’s work in Better Call Saul has been one of the more undervalued performances, particularly as her love for Jimmy comes into conflict with the corruption overcoming his nature. And as Kim’s relation to him finally came to a breaking point, it was a truly sad moment for this character and the series. I think she deserves to win something, and this is the Awards group to lead the way.
Should Win: Taylor.
Will Win: Seehorn.



Monday, January 7, 2019

Golden Globes Did Good... For TV, At Least


Over this decade, the Golden Globes has always been somewhat hit or miss when it comes to the ceremony. When it works, you have Tina Fey and Amy Poehler making us dance for joy; when it doesn’t you have Ricky Gervais doing… whatever the hell he does. Unfortunately, the presence of Andy Samberg and Sandra Oh came closer to the latter than the former.  Considering how good a job Samberg did hosting the Emmys a few years back, this is a huge disappointment. It seemed as if they were trying to say every uncomfortable thing possible, and it is telling that Poehler and Maya Rudolph generated more laughs in their five minutes than Samberg and Oh did in three hours plus.
For all that, thought, I’m inclined to be forgiving. For one thing, a lot of more of my predictions came true than I usually get, and for another, I generally was satisfied with those predictions. I think I practically leapt into orbit when The Americans won Best Drama. From that point on, the Globes could do no wrong, even when they did.
Sandra Oh was a dreadful host, but she almost made up for it in her exceptional speech when she deservedly won for Best Actress in a Drama for Killing Eve. Indeed, the Globes spread the love a lot this year, not just among series – the most any show won was two – but among services. Netflix and FX were the biggest winners with three trophies apiece, and I think the FX choices were far superior than the ones that Netflix gave out.
Maybe I was just shocked that The Kominsky Method did as well as it did. I have yet to get around to seeing it, but I never thought Michael Douglas had a chance in the Best Actor in a Comedy category. And it was rather shocking to see Chuck Lorre, who has become known almost more for the controversy surrounding his shows than for the often high quality, to actually seem gracious and overwhelmed when he won. I wonder how Charlie Sheen feels.
My greatest satisfaction came with the majority of the awards for TV Movie/Limited Series. The Assassination of Gianni Versace more than deserved to triumph over a strong field, as did Darren Criss. But it was also good to see Patricia Arquetter triumph for his radical work in Escape from Dannemora, (and it was cool to see Ben Stiller be there to give it to her) and Patricia Clarkson also emerge triumph for her strong work in Sharp Objects. Both are among the greatest character actresses working today, and I hope this is a sign of things to come. I’ll reserve judgment on Ben Whislaw’s triumph for A Very English Scandal until I see it, which should take too long.
And I was beyond overjoyed to learned that finally, the Golden Globes has decided to show the way, and give a Lifetime Achievement Award for people who in television. It is just as fitting that it should be named for Carol Burnett, one of television and entertainment’s greatest light. (Had they come to their senses earlier, they could’ve named it for Mary Tyler Moore, who had even greater success, but that’s just a sour grapes.) Burnett gave an amusing and powerful speech, about how lucky she was to work at the right time, and that it would be unlikely for a series like The Carol Burnett Show to get made today. “Thank God for re-runs and You-tube,” indeed. And yes I know, this will probably mean the Golden Globes will run an extra fifteen minutes each year, but frankly, I don’t care. Television has been long overdue for getting recognized as an art form. It is our solemn duty to recognize our ‘precious television heritage’ whenever possible. We need to remember the greats and immortals while they are still with us. Are the Golden Globes the ideal forum for it? I’d have preferred the Kennedy Center, but this will do. I just hope there is an audience to appreciate it.
See you in a couple of days when I discuss the Broadcast Critics.

Friday, January 4, 2019

My Picks For This Years Golden Globes TV, Part 2


BEST TV MOVIE, LIMITED SERIES …
Let’s not bother with the rest because, like last year, they’re all limited series. There are some strong contenders here, and its possible Sharp Objects and Escape at Dannemora will prevail elsewhere, but I think its likely to go to Assassination of Gianni Versace. The series is about to finish up its award march, and it likely deserves to.
Should Win/Will Win: Assassination of Gianni Versace

BEST ACTOR, LIMITED SERIES OR TV MOVIE
Personally, I still think that Benedict Cumberbatch deserves to triumph for his superb work in the title role of Patrick Melrose. But really, this is another easy one to predict. Darren Criss has had a lock on this award since February for his performance as Andrew Cunanan. It’s not like the competition is as strong as it was the last two years, so I think he’ll win in a walk.
Should Win: Cumberbatch.
Will Win: Criss.

BEST ACTRESS, LIMITED SERIES OR TV MOVIE
The toughest category to handicap of the night. My personal preference among this very strong field would be Patricia Arquette for her incredible work as Tilly Mitchell in Escape at Dannemora. But I think this is going to come down to a showdown between Amy Adams and Regina King, who are up against each other in two categories tonight. Since King is a shoo-in to triumph in Best Supporting Actress, I think the Hollywood Foreign Press will try to make amends, and give the prize here to Adams, who gave an equally stunning performance at the center of Sharp Objects.
Should Win: Arquette.
Will Win: Adams (but they’re all good choices)

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR, SERIES, LIMITED SERIES OR TV MOVIE
It’s always hard to try and figure out which way the Academy is going to go in the supporting categories. The last couple of years they have gone to the same project, but I find that unlikely this year. I think its going to come down to a showdown between Edgar Ramirez for Gianni Versace or Henry Winkler for Barry. Since Winkler gave a superb performance as the acting teacher, won the Emmy, and is the sentimental favorite, I’ll give him the barest of edges, acknowledging that Arkin could sneak in.
Should Win: Winkler.
Will Win: Winkler/Arkin.

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS, SERIES, LIMITED SERIES OR TV MOVIE
This is an even tougher category to fathom than Supporting Actor. All five nominees have a justifiable reason to being consider as winners, and all gave superb performance. I kind of think Strahovski’s the odd woman out, considering The Handmaid’s Tale wasn’t nominated for Best Drama.
My personal preference among the established character actresses would be for Patricia Clarkson. Her work as the manipulative matriarch who looked to be behind the murders at the center of Sharp Objects was one of the most quietly terrifying performances this past year. But I think the Globes will go for Penelope Cruz for her work as Donatella Versace in Gianni Versace. She got shafted by the Emmys for her work, and there’s more of a chance to make it up to her here, where as Clarkson has a chance to triumph later.
Should Win: Clarkson.
Will Win: Cruz (but again, all good choices).

See you Monday with the results.

My Picks For This Years Golden Globes TV: Part 1


As I seem to say every year around this time, the Golden Globes are the hardest awards show to handicap. They have a tendency to go for newer and shinier things rather than the staid patterns that the Emmys (until recently) have held fast too. Admittedly last year, they held a bit too close to the Emmys for my own good, but with a new slew of nominees, there’s little chance of that this year. They may even be able to do something they rarely get a chance to do: make up for a couple of last year’s shortcomings.
So here are my predictions for this year’s Golden Globes.

BEST TV DRAMA
In an aberration for these awards in general, this may be the easiest pick of the night. Granted, since the nominations came out, I’ve seen more than my share of episodes of both Killing Eve and Homecoming, and am more than willing to consider them among the best series of last year.
But it’s still an easy choice. In its final season, The Americans not only delivered one of the greatest conclusion to any series of last year, but cemented itself as one of the greatest series of all times. Considering the Golden Globes mostly ignored it during its run, I have feeling that, like with Breaking Bad’s final season, they will make up for their errors with this one.
Should Win/Will Win: The Americans

BEST ACTOR IN A TV DRAMA
I would normally fault the Golden Globes for basically duplicating the Emmys when it came to giving a major award. But in this case, I will definitely make an exception. Matthew Rhys’ performance as Philip Jennings has been one of the great male performances in television, up there with Walter White and Don Draper. Were Sterling Brown or Bob Odenkirk in this category, I might argue the point. But the competitions not as strong, and even if it were better, Rhys would still deserve it.
Should Win/Will Win: Rhys

BEST ACTRESS IN A TV DRAMA
In contrast, this is a much stronger category than Best Actor, and I actually would understand and could even see why a rival should win. Now, I think that Keri Russell’s work as Elizabeth was at least the equal of Rhys, and is deserving of a trophy. But I think it more likely that one of her competitors will triumph. Both Julia Roberts and Sandra Oh gave superb performances in their respective series (though I do think Jodie Comer should have been included for the latter show). But considering that Oh is the host, and that no Asian born actor has ever won for a lead role in a series (though Oh did triumph in a supporting category), I think it likely Sandra Oh will end up prevailing.
Should Win: Russell.
Will Win: Oh.

BEST TV COMEDY/MUSICAL
This, by contrast, is a far trickier category to navigate than was Best Drama. I thought that both Kidding and Barry are solid entries, and other years would probably win. Marvelous Mrs. Maisel is coming off a big win at the Emmys, but there hasn’t been a repeat in this category for a very long time.
I’m going to give the barest of edges to my personal favorite The Good Place. I want it to win, because its been one of the more brilliant series on TV for quite some time, and the episode it used to finish the season was one of the highlights of the year. Besides, I think the Hollywood Foreign Press will want to give an award to the networks, and this is practically their only chance.
Should Win: The Good Place.
Will Win: Marvelous Mrs. Maisel/The Good Place.

Kidding (2018)

BEST ACTOR IN A TV COMEDY
An even harder choice than the previous one. Donald Glover got snubbed by the Emmys this year for his brilliant second season of Atlanta. Bill Hader is the actor who beat him. And Jim Carrey’s work on Kidding was one of the most quietly funny and moving performances I saw last year.
My personal preference is for Carrey, because he was good, and he’s been gone for awhile. But I think it more likely that the Globes will recognize Glover, who had an even better year than everyone else.
Should Win: Carrey.
Will Win: Glover.

BEST ACTRESS IN A TV COMEDY
Tough call. Candice Bergen and Debra Messing have no real chance here. Allison Brie really should be higher up on the list of contenders, but for some reason, hers was the only nomination that GLOW got. So I think it will come down to Kristen Bell or Rachel Brosnahan.
I really want it to go to Bell, who has been quietly ignored by every major award group for nearly fifteen years, and whose work on The Good Place is a personal triumph. But I think in this case, the Globes will go to a safer choice, and recognize the undeniably, well, marvelous Rachel Brosnahan again. I just hope Bell gets another shot.
Should Win: Bell.
Will Win: Brosnahan.

Thursday, January 3, 2019

No Sophomore Slump - grown-ish Season 2


In the very first minute of the second season of grown-ish, Freeform’s often quite wonderful spin-off/companion series to black-ish, lead Zoey Johnson (Yara Shahdi) talks quite openly about the idea of sequels being better than the original. In traditional Johnson fashion, she relates examples like Childish Gambino’s second album and Meghan Markle’s second marriage. She has prepared herself for a sophomore which is going to be far better than her freshman year, with a better living situation and a solid boyfriend. But because this series comes from the mind of Kenya Barris, it takes all of two minutes for things to begin falling apart.
Grown-ish had the double obstacle last season of becoming not just a spin-off from a brilliant comedy series, but being shown on a spinoff network. But over the past couple of years, freeform has managed to delight and even inspire with it’s own spin on original programming. As I’m sure Zoey would tell us, there’s an advantage to being on basic cable. And in a way, grown-ish has managed to be a part of this change. I’m not a hundred percent sure that ABC would’ve allowed Zoey to get addicted to uppers, let alone let one of its central character be a drug dealer.
And as always, the second season begins with that same kind of chaos. Everybody says that they had a hellacious summer, and now they’ve come back to an off-campus housing that’s barely acceptable, and a new set of problems. For Zoey, her main issue is trying to build a relationship with Luca (Luca Hall), who she managed to have a fine relationship with while he was in Paris, but the moment they’re on the same continent, things immediately start going badly. Of course, a lot of this is in Zoey’s head, as she’s more concerned with how things look on social media then trying to build an actual relationship. But in a way that I’m not sure even black-ish could embrace, social media is what manages to help them rebuild.
Everyone else is having their own level of difficulties. Aaron (Trevor Jackson), the student activist has now been promoted to RA, but his ideas of team building really leave something to be desired. (His idea of a movie involving black empowerment is 12 Years A Slave.) Nomi is still trying to deal with how to be bisexual, which kind of backfired last season. Jazz and Sky are now on an all-carb diet which let to real problems in the first episode. Frankly, the only person who seems to be doing well at all is Charlie, who somehow managed to get promoted to dean of students at the end of last season. (Dre would probably not be shocked that Charlie continues to fail upward.)
grown-ish still isn’t quite as hysterical or game-changing as its parent show is. But in a funny way, that’s actually an argument for it. black-ish had its own obstacles to get through in order to be come (as Aaron would put it, despite the constant objections) ‘a pillar of black excellence’ as well as a brilliant comedy. This series, by contrast, with less pressure from the censors, has been able to stake out its own turf, and has become as quietly entertaining and subversive. And since it has been guaranteed a Season 3, it may in its own way become as much a powerhouse as black-ish without the pressure of the world on it.
My score: 4 stars.