I have never
really liked most comic book movies for a very bizarre reason. They don’t take
place in the real world.
I’m not talking
about the aliens or the demigods or the costumes. I mean that none of the
problems that Superman or Wonder Woman or Spider Man or almost any of those
beloved costume heroes are dealing with exist in a recognizable world. It’s
that the only think that happens in these worlds are alien invasions or
interdimensional wormholes or crises with mutants or threats that can be
resolved in two hours. The comic book world has always solved crises but not
problems. Perhaps that is the real reason so many of us have been drawn to Watchmen:
it shows that at end of the day, the smartest man in the world or a man who
can see every bit of time and space still can’t do anything to stop the fact
that mankind will destroy itself even with them existing. (At some point I will review both the film and
HBO adaptation of Watchmen because I do consider them both
masterpieces.) Superman might be able to get the earth to rotate backwards, but
can he stop bigotry? Can Wonder Woman stop poverty? At least Tony Stark was
willing to spend some of his money on saving a city rather than giant iron
suits.
The only comic
book character who I have ever thought existed at least in part in the real
world is Batman. And that’s because he’s not a superhero in the conventional sense.
For all intents and purposes, he’s a vigilante. The only think that truly
separates him from the criminals he spends the nights beating up is that he has
decided he wouldn’t kill any of them, and we all know that’s done more harm
than good. Bruce Wayne by any definition of the term is insane. All of the
criminal he fights are institutionalized rather than jailed. Christopher Nolan
has acknowledged as much in The Dark Knight. In the midst of locking up
Scarecrow (Cillian Murphy) Batman yells at some fellow vigilantes: “I don’t
need any help.” Scarecrow says: “That’s not my diagnosis” and he’s spot on. Rachel
Dawes, the woman Bruce Wayne loves, knows this and tells him so at the end of Batman
Begins. He never gets a letter from her before she dies that she knows that
he will never not need the Batman, that Bruce Wayne is essentially the costume.
Christopher
Nolan’s Dark Knight trilogy will, in my opinion, always be the gold
standard for all comic book movies and while individual films within the DC universe
and the MCU might surpass some of the films in quality, I feel assured that
none will ever surpass the accomplishment that Nolan showed in these three
films. There are many reasons for this but there are three critical ones. The
first is simple: Nolan uses his three films to tell a complete saga from
beginning to end. In the more than a decade since The Dark Knight Rises Nolan
has never attempted to revisit the world he has created and while the most
recent version of Batman at least tried to hit on some of the themes Nolan did,
Matt Reeves film essentially started with Batman essentially in media res.
The second
equally important one, is that from beginning to end, much of what happens in
the Dark Knight series is based in real life situations. Only Nolan has
ever used the lens of the comic book movie to hold a mirror to the world we
currently live in. Many people considered The Dark Knight the most
accurate reflection of the War on Terror that we saw in the first decade
following 9/11. Few movies – and fewer comic book films – have raised the moral
issues about the compromises we make as a society for security and how thin the
moral layer that we consider truly is.
The third is
subtler but no less important. Nolan’s movies are as much about Bruce Wayne as
they are about Batman. Indeed, in The Dark Knight Rises Batman has much
less screen time then he does in the previous two films. The Caped Crusader
only appears in a short sequence halfway through the movie, a major fight
sequence about twenty minutes later and then only for the film’s final
half-hour. The rest of the time the movie is focused on Bruce Wayne. In that
sense The Dark Knight Rises is unique among comic books movies as it as
much about the absence of its hero then his actual presence. This gives Nolan a
chance to do something I never saw any other comic book film do actually argue
whether the hero at the center is even a positive force in his own franchise.
I don’t think
this could have been done with any other character but Batman, who has been
famous for more than eighty years not only for being isolated but not truly
highly regarded by even the people he wants to help. Batman has always been
regarded as a menace, not only by the villains and criminal elements of Gotham
City, but by law enforcement and indeed most civilians. In a sly referral to
this in The Dark Knight, a media figure spends much of the movie
considering that Batman is a threat that needs to be stopped (in typical
fashion Batman saves him by the end of the film) but it’s clear that he is
speaking for the majority of the public. Commissioner Gordon (Gary Oldman) is
the only true ally he has among the police force and throughout the first two
movies he is barely tolerated. It is only when we meet Jon Blake (Joseph
Gordon-Levitt) that we realize Batman has had a positive impact at all, and he
has to threaten to expose him in order to even get in the door of Wayne Manor.
The Dark Knight
Rises makes
perhaps the strongest argument possible that Bruce Wayne and by extension
Batman’s quest is ultimately futile: that he needs it more than Gotham City
does. The movie opens eight years after the end of The Dark Knight and not
only has their been no sign of Batman since then, Bruce Wayne has disappeared
from sight as well. Early in the movie a Congressman says that Wayne spends his
days ‘peeing into Mason jars’ and he’s not far off. Alfred tells Bruce early in
the film that you stopped being Batman “but you didn’t get a life. You’ve just
been waiting for things to get bad again.” When Bruce begins to take on the mantle Alfred
keeps warning him not to get involved. “You’re afraid I’ll fail.” Bruce says. “No.
I’m afraid you want too.”
In the eight
years between the films, it truly seems like Gotham has recovered. The Mayor
tells a crowd that the city has seen a historical rebirth, and while this is
clearly only on the surface it is very clear that Wayne has been waiting all
this time to be proven wrong, for him to be needed again. Commissioner Gordon
seems to have taken a similar approach: in an early scene we see him by the
ruins of the Batsignal and he actually seems to be happy that a Congressman has
been abducted. (In truth, he’s just gotten drunk and run off with Selina Kyle
as leverage.) In both his case and that of Bruce Wayne, you realize that they
have never stopped waiting for things to go wrong, no matter how great the
cost. Gordon’s wife and son, who he risked his life to save at the climax of
the last film, have left him in the interim and Gordon had chosen the city over
his family. In Bruce Wayne’s case Rachel’s words have proven a prophecy: he
will always need it more than human contact.
The Dark Knight
Rises bares
the closest resemblance to any actual comic book storylines: Knightfall, the
saga in which Bane arrives in Gotham, breaks Batman’s spine in battle and he
spends months in recovery; and No Man’s Land, when the government decides
that Gotham is a lost cause, essentially isolates from it the rest of America,
and the city is left to fend for itself. However as with the previous movies in
the trilogy, Nolan uses the trappings of the comic book to paint a larger
picture of our society.
In the years
that followed many would consider the actions of Bane to be a parallel of the
populism and politics of rage that would be the focus of the 2016 election. Despite
so many of the scenes that show the rich celebrating in glamor, an action by
Bane at the stock exchange in which the head insists that it’s a robbery (“It’s
everybody’s money” he says when a police official balks at stopping the trading
first) and the nature of Bane’s ‘revolution, Nolan would say that this message
was unintentional. I am inclined to view the film as a continuation of the story
that Nolan was telling in The Dark Knight about the consequences of the
War on Terror, particularly long term.
When the film
begins, the Mayor is celebrating the anniversary of The Dent Act, which we
later learn is an action to lock criminals up in a maximum security prison
known as Bloodgate and deny them parole. The Mayor says when it comes to repealing
the Dent Act, “Not on my watch.” It is hard not to think of both the passage of
the Patriot Act after 9/11 and the problems we’ve had closing Guantanamo. When
Bane (Tom Hardy) begins his revolution, one of his first major acts is to
reveal the reasons behind the Dent Act were a lie, and that these criminals
were falsely imprisoned. This lie is in fact called out by Blake to Gordon over
TV. Gordon gives a speech about how there comes a point where the rules become
shackles and that there will come a point when you’ll want ‘a friend like man,
willing to bloody his hands to keep yours clean.” Blake says to Gordon: “Your
hands look plenty dirty to me.” That he comes around to Gordon’s way of
thinking at the end of the film basically takes the form of the ends justifying
the means – which has been one of the basic tenets of the War on Terror.
The symbolism
is clear in other forms; some more direct. Bane begin his attack on Gotham
after a young man sings the National Anthem at a football game. His comments
while it is going on are: “That’s a lovely voice” before he says: “Let the
games begin!” and then blows up the field while the players are still on it.
The image of a running back eating up yardage while the field collapses behind
him is one of the most striking in the film. Like all of Nolan’s films, he is a
master of the visual: the movie opens with a scene where Bane uses a larger plane
to kidnap a doctor in mid-air that I have never been able to forget. Just as he
takes the man hostage he says: “Now is not the time for fear. That comes later.”
Hardy’s portrayal
of Bane took a lot of abuse at the time because filmgoers had difficulty
understand his speech during the movie. I never had any real difficulty with
that when I saw the film. Lost under that is the fact that Bane is by far the
most interesting villain in Nolan’s world (though as we find out, he is in a
sense a red herring) Bane comprehends what Bruce Wayne has fundamentally been
in denial about in all his years in the comics: that Gotham is beyond saving.
Bane wants to torture both Gotham and Batman who he is sees as two sides of the
same coin.
In this sense, he decides to use methods that
are not unlike the ones we see the government using in both Afghanistan and
Iraq: by using the threat of destruction to get the military itself to hold
Gotham hostage by essentially making the city a nuclear deterrent. There is footage
of the military looking on from TV and we see an official saying: “We do not
negotiate with terrorist but we do accept reality.” Nolan is no doubt using
this as a metaphor for the failed occupation of Iraq; at one point, he uses the
government’s attempt at obtaining intelligence by ‘hanging them where the world
can see’. One can just as easily see this as a metaphor for Al-Qaeda’s beheading
of American soldiers online. The fact that Bruce Wayne in his prison around the
world has a television perpetually tuned to what is happening in Gotham is a metaphor for how America views
so much of foreign policy these days.
One admits that
there are flaws in the film that don’t make sense as part as canon of the world
of DC but I’d argue that they make sense in part of the larger narrative Nolan
is telling. A third of the way through the movie, Alfred tells Bruce that he
has no intention of helping him any more and that he won’t watch him die. While
this is inconsistent with the narrative we saw in Batman Begins where
Alfred was Batman’s biggest cheerleader, one can see this as part of Alfred’s
own arc. Over more than a decade, he has seen the man he considers a son
essentially lose any human contact he might have for a city that thinks nothing
for him and who refuses any desire to try and move past it.
This has honestly
been a flaw that many long time fans of Batman have discussed. It’s
worth noting that while Bruce is being held prisoner he has a vision of Ras
(Liam Neeson) and in a sense, his subconscious is telling him what he has to
have known: “You thought the evils of Gotham. With all your strength. All your
resources. All your moral authority. And the only victory you could achieve was
a lie.” It is worth noting that Bruce
returns to Gotham only to save it from being wiped off the face of the earth.
At a critical moment Selina Kyle tells him: “You don’t owe Gotham any more. You’ve
given these people everything.” Bruce says: “Not everything.” In a sense his
actions in the final third of the film are perhaps his epiphany: that the
battle will never end, and that only by giving his life can he finally be free
of the struggle.
Because Batman
is fundamentally absent from the film for much of the movie, far more attention
is focused on the police, most notably Gordon and Blake. Oldman does some remarkable
work in the film that shows his power as an actor. He spends the first half of
the movie in a hospital bed recovering from an earlier attack. When Bane
launches his attack on Gotham, he sends two of his henchmen to seek him out.
Blake runs through the streets and we intercut between the men, Gordon in the
hospital bed, and finally Blake arriving to hear gunshots. He reaches Gordon’s
room to find his bed empty. Then we hear a gun cock. “Clear the corners,
rookie,” he says simply. “Get my coat.”
Gordon spends
most of the film to try to organize a resistance, tracking a truck that has the
bomb, determined to find a way to stop it. Near the end of the film, he tracks
down a colleague of his (Matthew Modine)who has lost his nerve and urges him to
find a way to fight: “This only gets fixed from inside the city!” he shouts. When
the final battle for Gotham rages we see Modine in his dress blues with a
baton, walking down the streets. When the military tells him to disperse he
says: “There’s only one police in this town.” The final battle for Gotham is
not so much between Batman and Bane but between the police and the army and its
more brutal than anything we’re used to in this kind of film.
The last half
hour of the film have been said to have so many flaws that they stop The Dark
Knight Rises from being a true masterpiece the way the second film was.
Perhaps Nolan, who had basically spent most of the movie ignoring typical comic
book references, decided to satisfy the fanboys and put in one too many easter
eggs. Yet as a body of work the
film is a fitting conclusion to the trilogy because Nolan makes clear it’s a conclusion.
Batman might well exist in some form, but Nolan has made it very clear in
the age of the endless sequels and reboots that he has no intention of ever
revisiting the world of Batman. And he does not need too. His saga of Batman
had a beginning, middle and end. In the world where everything has to be a
franchise, that’s a testament to him as an artist.
Nolan has been
one of the greatest filmmakers in the 21st century, one whose films
appeal to your brain as much as the eye. Such has been the case since he broke
on to the national scene with Memento one of the true masterpieces of
independent film and one of the greatest mindbenders in history. When he took
over the world of Batman he completely redefined what a superhero movie
was capable of. Nor did he rest on his laurels: before The Dark Knight came
out he made the remarkable The Prestige and before The Dark Knight
Rises, he brought us Inception. People are still trying to figure
out what the endings of those films meant years after the fact, but few would deny
the visual power and the way they make you think.
After The
Dark Knight Rises, he created the complicated space opera Interstellar, a movie that dealt with the possibility
extinction of humanity, the limits of space and time and how love can drive us.
Dunkirk told the story of one of the most famous events in World War II
from three very different perspectives. (By Nolan’s standards, it was a short
film, clocking in at an hour and forty five minutes; most of the films he’s
made since Batman Begins have been in the two and a half hour range.) Tenet,
which Nolan insisted have theatrical release even when the world was in
lockdown, would unlikely have been a box office success even had it come out in
a normal release; it is far too confusing and cerebral to follow even after multiple
viewings but few filmmakers would have bothered to tell a story this
complicated at all.
From the moment
Oppenheimer was greenlit in the spring of 2022, many entertainment
critics viewed that it might very well be the last of its breed: a big budget
studio epic that was going be released in multiple theaters. Even when
Americans lit up at the sight of the trailers and the early critical praise
began to roll in, few really thought that audiences would go to see an R-rated
three hour film in the middle of July. On its opening weekend, Oppenheimer
grossed $81 million domestically and over $180 million internationally, one of
the best starts ever for either an R-rated movie or a biographical drama. Christopher
Nolan has managed many remarkable feats in his incredible career. If he manages
to completely change how studios think about releasing serious movies in the
summer and funding them at all, that is a far greater act of salvation than
anything Batman ever accomplished Nolan made about him.
No comments:
Post a Comment