Written by Jorge Zamacona; story
by Tom Fontana
Directed by Peter Markle
When I first reviewed this
episode more than twenty years ago I said it was the least successful one of
the first season. Not because it was unwatchable or even mediocre - as one very quickly finds the worst episode
of Homicide was still better than eighty percent of network TV in the
1990s – but it seemed a bit unfocused.
And there is a certainly
underlying truth to an episode that was originally planned to be the
penultimate episode of Season 1. During the 1990s traditional dramas built to a
climatic season finale that would be a cliffhanger which was almost never the
show’s style. What you get in Rockets’ is an episode that seems to be trying to
wrap up some stories, telling new stories about existing characters and
building up new relationships for the future. That’s something that by and
large most shows get more time to do overall even in the shorter seasons of
today. And indeed much of the ‘sins’ -
if you can call them that - is that
Zamacona are trying to fill in as many gaps about their characters as quickly
as possible without any time to breathe. To be fair to the writers all of the
stories would play out to an extent in future seasons but it’s a lot to take in
at first (and maybe even third) viewing.
The most important element in
terms of the show’s legacy involves John Munch. We’ve gotten hints of his
character’s nature in the series so far – lovelorn, inclined towards trivia,
not perhaps the best investigator – but in the episode the series opens up its
greatest well. The murder involves the death of Ambrose Urban, a marijuana
dealer who was gunned down. From the start of the investigation its very clear
not only that Munch knows far more about the subject of marijuana and its
growth then the average detective should but unlike so much of its other
ramblings, it’s clear that this is something he feels very strongly and
emotionally about.
The show makes this very clear
by having his scenes clash with Detective DeSilva, the first narcotics
detective we’ve met on Homicide so far. Steven Marcus would only make
two appearances on the show but in his scene in the breakroom, he lays a
discussion that would become one of the bigger ongoing arguments on Homicide
and almost certainly the inspiration for The Wire.
It starts humorously enough –
Munch shows up in the squad with a bag of dope that a young man tossed to him
because apparently he didn’t look like a cop. Munch and the others are joking
about this when Da Silva comes in with the news that the man pulled a gun and
they took him out. There’s grousing about this – no one wants to do the
paperwork – but Munch actually brings up the major point about how many of the
murders in Baltimore involve drug dealing. He argues if they legalized it (the
theme of Season 3 of The Wire) it might make things easier.
Da Silva makes a point much
louder than anyone ever will on that show about its futility. When Bayliss
brings up the idea of legalization he says Baltimore will drown. (That it
pretty much is a decade later is a sad aftermath) Then he argues: “Why let the
mafia make all the money? You want the government to get involved in
extortion?” This is actually a point you honestly wonder why none of the bosses
ever think to make. When Bayliss argues for regulation he says: “The government
can’t even deliver the mail! You want them to start handing out dime bags?”
(Another very valid point.) When Bayliss points out cancer kills more people in
a year than heroin does Da Silva argues: “Tobacco and alcohol are as addictive
as heroin and in large enough doses they kill.” When Munch adds we rarely have
people kill each other over a Marlboro light he is denying the very real level
of the problem. Da Silva has just a cynical an idea about the war on drugs is
being fought – and he makes a telling comparison between foreign policy and
drug addiction that is something McNulty never seems to get – but he’s arguing
for escalation, not legalization.
But Munch will never give up
this point. And in the scene in the squad car with Baltimore we get our
clearest sense of his counterculture upbringing to take. Its also the first
real sense that Munch may not entirely be repentant – he refuses to
answer Bolander’s question about getting high and you actually wonder about
whether he pass a test for clean urine. Bolander never presses the point the
way other members of the squad will but it does explain something. It’s pretty
clear based on what Munch says in this episode that he and Bolander are roughly
the same age but the reason that Bolander thinks himself as the grownup in this
partnership has to do with emotional maturity. He has it; Munch never will.
The other case that the show is
dealing with is Lewis and Crosetti’s investigation into the murder of a Chinese
student who was apparently one of the leaders at Tiananmen Square (still
memorable to America viewers in 1993) They meet a witness who claims the
Chinese government had Wong murdered which leads to Lewis and Munch making a
trip to DC to get information from the Chinese embassy.
At first this seems like an
excuse for Crosetti to realize his ambition of seeing all of the sites on his
tour of the Lincoln conspirators which has been his obsession throughout Season
1. (Compared to the kind of rants Munch will go on later in the series, it’s
kind of adorable watching Steve go all fanboy outside Mary Seurat’s boarding
house.) But when the detectives get to the embassy things get very peculiar:
men in a town car show up and the detectives are brought into meet a man with
the Secret Service who tells them to drop their investigation and that the
woman who they talked to doesn’t exist. Munch might be thrilled with this of
thing; Meldrick and Crosetti are annoyed.
The two detectives go to Ford’s
Theater and while Steve is overjoyed to see his favorite place in the world
Lewis is stone-faced. The discussion about the Secret Service starts in a dark
place and Lewis starts going after Washington in comparison to Baltimore. It
becomes clear very quickly that this is more about an argument of civic pride.
(And for those who watch it from the present the Ravens were not in Baltimore
until 1996 and Washington had no baseball team until 2005.)
Meldrick Lewis will have a
tendency to be self-righteous more often then most characters and while this
can be tiring later on, in contrast with Munch’s antiestablishment position
there’s something righteous about how this humble detective has no use for the
institutions that the Secret Service defends and believes in government being
of, by and for the people. This has nothing to do with politics (Homicide
rarely brings up current events) and more to a higher principle that
Meldrick will not find in DC.
The most interesting storyline
in a sense is the conclusion to the Ida Mae Keene case which was closed
yesterday. In what will be one of the few times in the show’s history the
detectives go to the court. I can’t imagine what today’s viewers where Law & Order is always on
somewhere will think if they see the court proceedings here. To be sure there’s
the sparring between the detectives and Danvers that we sometimes get on Law
and Order but we see very clearly that Ed Danvers is not Jack McCoy. And I
have a feeling based on what we do see that Homicide’s depiction of
criminal trials are far more accurate than what we get on Law & Order.
The big deal is that Howard and
Felton spent the majority of the episode sequestered unlike so many other cop
shows where the detectives seem to observe the proceedings from start to finish.
A lot of the humor in the episode comes from seeing Howard, dressed in clothes
and wearing makeup she absolutely never wears on the job because she
wants to make an impression on the jury, sitting in an anteroom, nervous and
antsy about how things are going. Felton is more relaxed and is watching a
portable TV but unlike other episodes this is a case of being smart rather than
unprofessional. He gets why Howard is so twitchy – she’s a very active and dedicated
investigator and she’s not comfortable with this part of the process. In the
squad room and the box she has control of everything: now she’s basically
isolated from whether or not Pony Johnson goes to prison. Felton’s laxness is
more about someone who knows that the process is out of his hands and is not
being lazy but accepting.
And when Howard is called as a
witness we do see a side of her we haven’t as Johnson’s defense attorney
flusters her. This is the first appearance of Michael Willis as the slimy
Russom, who seems to be the only defense attorney in Baltimore based on the fact
every time a client needs an attorney he’s on hand. That said, when we do see
Russom in the courtroom you might understand why he is always on call:
he manages to fluster Howard by poking holes in the evidence and causing her to
make a critical misstatement on the stand.
Furthermore anyone who’s used to
trials on Law & Order would be astonished to see how the defense
becomes undone. We don’t see a soaring closing argument delivered by Sam
Waterston, the accused doesn’t become unraveled on the stand – indeed we never
see the defense witnesses at all – and there’s no soaring musical chords when
things go wrong. Indeed the case unravels when Russom makes procedural misstep
so subtle that the average viewer might not realize unless they were paying
close attention. (I think I know what it is but I won’t spoil it here.) And
like so much else on the show, this comes from how the investigation in Simon’s
book unfolded basically at trial.
Of course the fun story comes
when Howard starts talking up Danvers and Felton starts to sense that his
partner might have a crush on this poor civil servant. Howard adamantly denies
– and of course that’s the moment we see that Danvers has entered the room. At
the end of the episode Danvers shyly asks Kay out on a date and she’s more than
willing to go. This relationship will go on throughout the next few seasons but
in keeping with the series behavior we only learn about it from behind the
scenes. Howard values her privacy very deeply and in an era when female
characters were defined exclusively as love interests, there’s something
revolutionary about it.
The character who shows up the
least in this episode is Pembleton, who is working a case. He is sent up to see
Granger and Bonfather and he actually thinks he’s here to be disciplined.
Bonfather goes out of his way to praise Pembleton’s work as a detective,
mentions streamlining the department and gets to the point that the brass is
considering Pembleton to be the next shift commander.
It's rare we see Frank taken
aback and his first reaction is not to tell Gee. We then get a different
insight into Frank we haven’t seen before – he’s a husband. In one of those
acts of talent we meet Mary Pembleton who is played by Ami Brabson, Braugher’s
real life wife and a superb actress in her own right. Right from the start we
see that Frank truly loves Mary and that he truly wants what’s best for her. She
tries to talk up the meaning of both the money and what it means and Frank,
tellingly, says that it would mean he’d see even less of her than he already
does. Mary says that if he wants it they’ll find a way to make it work – and
she also knows her husband well enough to know what he’s thinking.
Andre Braugher usually makes his
scenes work with the power of his delivery so there’s something moving about
how he wordlessly goes to Gee’s office, looks around nervously, sits in Gee’s
chair, looks at the picture of Gee and Scinta, respectfully cleans it and then
walks out. Afterward he talks to Gee and apologizes for lying and then makes it
very clear that while he respects the man he doesn’t want his job.
And the thing is we already know
Frank would suck as a leader. He himself knows it: “I don’t want to me in the
squad room when I’m supposed to be,” he tells Gee. We know the kind of man
Pembleton is and we already know he would be wasted behind a desk. He is where
he needs to be and Gee is where he needs to be. He also knows that he’s the
wrong person to be the kind of disciplinarian Gee is; it’s not in his nature.
The bosses will eventually move to fill Scinta’s spot – it will take until
Season 3 to find a candidate – but Pembleton is never considered for leadership
again. And television is all the greater for it.
NOTES FROM THE BOARD
Detective Munch: “I really
enjoyed how Jimi Hendrix played the Star-Spangled Banner at Woodstock.” The
first line that really tells us the kind of person Munch is, even if he wasn’t
actually there.
First Appearance: Michael Willis
as Russom and Ami Brabson as Mary Pembleton. We also learn that Felton’s wife
grew up in the town Boring in Maryland. “And you wonder why we’re in
counseling?” he tells Howard when she asks. (There’s more to it as we’ll soon
find out.)
Hey Isn’t That… No you didn’t
read the opening credits wrong, that is Bai Ling in the opening sequence as
Taryn Chow. The same woman who has been appearing in B-Movies in America. To
her credit she also appears in a lot of Chinese films and in this case her more
annunciation skills work in the episode’s favor. She’s also only there for
ninety seconds, which is just about the appropriate amount of screen time
before she becomes unbearable.
Ed Lauter plays THE Secret Service Agent in the middle of
what was a long and storied career as a character actor in a career that mostly
had him playing authority figures on every 1970s TV show to The Longest Yard to
his last role in The Office. He might best be known for his role in Family Plot
what would turn out to be the last movie Hitchcock ever made. His only role as
a series regular was on The Golden Years the first TV series that Stephen King
ever wrote for. (It didn’t last long.)
This episode was directed by
Peter Markle who is one of the hardest working directors in television. His
film work is less reputable including such forgettable movies as Youngblood,
Bat 21 and Wagons East, the last movie John Candy ever starred in before he
died. He has a better track record with television, later directing episodes of
The X-Files, NYPD Blue and such critically acclaimed series as Life, Rescue Me
and Crash.
No comments:
Post a Comment