Thursday, January 9, 2025

This IS Jeopardy - Failures of the Superchampions, Interlude: A Personal Reflection on the Jeopardy Greats Prior to the Age of James Holzhauer

 

By the time Season 35 began in 2018 the idea of trying to rank who the greatest players in Jeopardy history were was becoming a more concrete idea in my mind. I suspected - and I would be proven correct – that because the show was entering its 35th year, there would be a special tournament in recognition of this anniversary.

As any fan of the show is aware that turned out to be correct as in October the show’s producers announced the Jeopardy All-Star Challenge. Quickly I had issues with it, not just because it involved for the first time in the show’s history a team format, but also because the show only chose to invite eighteen players back to play again as opposed to the forty-five they had brought back in the Battle of the Decades to celebrate their thirtieth year on the air.

My frustration at the time was that none of the players invited back had played prior to 2000, only two (Brad Rutter and Pam Mueller) dated prior to before Ken Jennings arrival in 2004 and the majority were from the past ten years. And at the time three of them hardly seemed to be stretching the definition of All-Star past its breaking point. For all the skills that Leonard Cooper and Monica Thieu (winners of the 2013 Teen and College Tournaments, respectively) would demonstrate in the All-Stars I thought their selection seemed arbitrary at best and did a disservice to many of the other great champions during that same period at worst.

But in hindsight the producers seemed to have had a better grasp on what the fans of the show wanted to see in those selections. And in many ways by watching that Tournament I began to appreciate how difficult it would be trying to figure out how ranking Jeopardy champions would be, even after the sudden appearance of so many super-champions. That fact was clear in regard to how the all-time money winners had changed – or more accurately, hadn’t as of the All-Star Games.

By the end of the 2017 TOC Jeopardy had witness the rise of five players who had won eleven or more games. But because they had all come up short in the Tournament of Champions by the end of the 2017-2018 season, the all-time money winners had not altered much. Roger Craig was still in third place all time with $530,200.

For the record this is how all five super-champions ranked at the end of the 2017-2018 season when it came to money won:

Matt Jackson: $511,612

Julia Collins: $478.100

Austin Rogers: $461,000

Arthur Chu: $397,200

Seth Wilson: $272,000

 

The reason Roger was still in third place was because he had won the 2011 Tournament of Champions. Even without the benefit of his third place finish in the Battle of the Decades, he would have only dropped to fourth place all time in money won.

If nothing else, the All-Star Challenge may have driven home to me just how significant winning the Tournament of Champions is when it comes to determined how great a Jeopardy champion is in a way that all of my previous – and, it must be said, future – calculations of what it means to be a great Jeopardy champion truly means.

That might have been something that was a subtext to my watching the show for most of my life but previous ‘special tournaments’ such as the Million Dollar Masters in 2002 and the Ultimate Tournament of Champions in 2005 had done much to obscure that fact. When many previous winners of Tournaments of Champions were among those who were among the earliest eliminated in both previous tournaments part of me had begun to ponder whether winning this tournament may have been more of a testament to luck than skill. While that may well have been true in the first twenty years of Jeopardy in all the years since Jennings’s arrival that becomes clearer with each passing year and in many ways the All-Star Games helped illustrate that point to me when I was looking at how well so many of the participants had done on the show in regard to money won.

I have alluded to this throughout the series but it’s worth looking at the track record of many of them here because all of them would be invited back to the All-Star Games.

When the All-Star Games took place it was announced in the opening sequence – in something that would remind Alex Trebek of how the Mercury 7 were introduced to him as a child – they were referred to as ‘eighteen of the most celebrated Jeopardy players have been invited back to play again!” Aside from the hyperbole it wasn’t that much of an exaggeration.

The six captains were, by any logical standard, some of the greatest players of all time. No one doubted the significance of Brad and Ken’s accomplishments, Julia and Austin’s have been related in previous articles, Buzzy Cohen’s choice was fitting because he was the last Tournament of Champions winner and Colby Burnett had won both the 2012 Teachers Tournament and the 2013 Tournament of Champions.

As I said I had doubts about three of the players who had been invited back at the time: Monica Thieu, Leonard Cooper and Jennifer Giles the winner of the 2015 Teachers Tournament. (I remain baffled as to the rationale for the last selection compared to some of the other winners I’ve discussed in the articles above.) As to the other nine, well, the only difficulty I had was the era they represented: I couldn’t exactly fault them on their records.

Matt Jackson and Seth Wilson were invited back among them as well as David Madden, who for reason that are not worth going into had decided not to participate in the Battle of the Decades five years earlier. He was, as Alex Trebek himself mentioned, sorely missed.

As to the other six anyone who had watched the show would deny their merit of inclusion. Roger Craig was, naturally, one of them (I wondered later why he wasn’t made a captain instead of Colby) Pam Mueller, whose track record in Jeopardy Tournaments has been well documented in other articles was invited as was Alan Lin who perhaps deliberately would not be drafted by either Buzzy or Austin. The other three were Larissa Kelly, Ben Ingram and Alex Jacob.

So of the eighteen players invited back a third of them had won a Tournament of Champions. Brad, of course, had won considerably more Tournament then that and Colby had been a semi-finalist in the Battle of the Decades before he was ultimately beaten by Roger Craig.

So let’s have a look at the cash-winnings of the six players invited back who weren’t super-champions in the way that some of the others were. I’ll list them chronologically:

 

Larissa Kelly: $327,597

Colby Burnett: $375,000

Ben Ingram: $426, 534

Alex Jacob: $399,802

Buzzy Cohen: $414, 603

Alan Lin: $223,600

 

Aside from Colby, all of them won at least six games in their original appearance and indeed Roger had won that many in his original run.

To win the Tournament of Champions does much to move any contestant up on the leaderboard. At the time of the All-Star Games the five contestants listed above were all among the greatest money winners in Jeopardy history along with the super-champions above and, of course, Brad, Ken and Roger.

 In addition Larissa had been in fourth place in money won in a regular appearance until 2014 when Arthur Chu started putting her down the leaderboard. It’s a measure of how great a player Larissa was that it took Arthur eight days to get past that total (and he had to win $58,200 to do so) and Julia needed eleven. Obviously Buzzy never came close to doing that in his original run but Austin was better at it then her. (Roger Craig is the only player invited to the All-Stars who played at a comparable level to her in his six wins.)

One would have been hard-pressed to argue that the producers didn’t make the right selections among this group overall but one does still wonder why the three players I listed above were chosen if the purpose was to bring back memorable players. Even if you were to limit the selection from the past decade then there will still clearly several choices who would have had more reason to be chosen and who might have led to an even better competition.

Those three choices probably should have been the three players who at the time were similar ranked on the leaderboard. Arthur Chu is the most obvious exclusion and the only explanation I have was his reputation among fans as being something of a ‘Jeopardy villain’ at the time. However there were two other champions who’d had records that were nearly as impressive as most of all the other major invitees. I referred to them in passing in the first article in this series but it is worth going over it now because for that reason I considered them among the all-time greats later on.

Dan Pawson first appeared on Jeopardy on December 27, 2007 little more than a month after that year’s Tournament of Champions. It wasn’t a remarkable game – he only won $9700 but from that inauspicious beginning he managed to win nine consecutive games, the most that any Jeopardy Champion had won since David Madden’s 19. There were big wins and small wins – on his seventh win he prevailed with $200; on his eighth, he won $25,000 – but at the end of his run he’d managed to win $170,902. It was an impressive figure in 2007 but by the end of the season Larissa Kelly had managed to win $222,597 in six.

The two ended up facing off in the 2009 Tournament of Champions (which was filmed in Las Vegas)  and though such things rarely happened in my experience both of them managed to make it all the way to the Finals. They faced off against Aaron Schroeder who’d won an impressive five games and $127,902 on his own. He was more than up to the challenge actually going into Game 1 with a narrow lead over both players but Larissa and Dan would respond correctly on that games Final Jeopardy and bet almost everything they had. Aaron was wrong and while his wager was not significant, it put him at a disadvantage he would be unable to overcome.

Game 2 was a back and forth battle for Larissa and Dan for supremacy with Larissa going into Final Jeopardy with a very narrow lead. However this time she was the only player who didn’t know the correct response in Final Jeopardy and as a result Dan won $250,000.

At the end of the Tournament of Champions Dan had winnings totaling  $420,902, only slightly behind David Madden then in fourth place on the leaderboard. Larrisa’s $100,000 put her at $322,597. Both returned to the Battle of the Decades five years later, based on their impressive merits during the 2009 season.

Larissa competed in the third game and basically led from beginning to end. However a Daily Double on the penultimate clue of Double Jeopardy and a correct response by Russ Schumacher stopped her from having a runaway going into Final Jeopardy. Like so many of the Final Jeopardy clues in that tournament no one gave a correct response and it came down to wagering. Because Russ bet nothing and Larissa played to win, Russ would end up advancing while Larissa went home with $5000.

Dan had better luck against Maria Wenglinsky and Keith Whitener in what would be the last game of Round 1. He had a big lead throughout the Jeopardy round and much of Double Jeopardy. However in the final stretch Maria made a huge comeback and went into Final Jeopardy with a narrow lead over Dan. Once again everybody got Final Jeopardy wrong and what worked for Russ in his match ended up working for Dan in his game – he wagered the least of the three players and that allowed him to advance.

Unfortunately Dan’s luck only went so far: in his quarterfinal match he ran into Brad Rutter and like so many before and after him,  he was runover. He didn’t qualify for a wild-card and he left with $10,000.

Considering their respective track records you would have thought if Larissa was invited back Dan should have been as well. That said, Larissa was second on the all-time list for money won by a female contestant and considering that Julia Collins had broken that record in her original appearance (which began not long after Larissa’s defeat in the Battle of The Decades) the logic was understandable.

The other choice was harder to comprehend, but ultimately understandably given the circumstances of his original appearance. Tom Nissley had first appeared on Jeopardy on December 14th 2010 and won $24,801 in his first game. On his fourth win he won a very impressive $43,800 and while he never hit that high a figure when he departed the show on Christmas Eve, he’d won eight games and $235,405. At that point that total was the third most any Jeopardy champion had won in their original appearance – and no one would win more than that until Arthur Chu in 2014.

But I don’t remember ever thinking of Tom Nissley when I was anticipating the Tournament of Champions the following November. Like all Jeopardy fans we were waiting for the return of Roger Craig who’d won nearly as much as Tom in six games. The fact that Tom had won more games and more money was likely viewed as a technicality for most Jeopardy viewers at the time; there was no question which one of these men was the superior player.

And even though Tom was good in his quarterfinal win and his semi-final win Roger Craig was, well, Roger Craig. When Tom went into the Double Jeopardy round of Game 1 of the Finals with a narrow lead over Tom, I know I was thinking: “Roger will come to life in Double Jeopardy. Which he did: he found both Daily Doubles back to back and quadrupled his total. From that point on, the TOC was an exercise and by the end of Game 1, it was all over sans the shouting. Tom was lucky to finish in second place and get the $100,000.

That being said, it did strike me as odd in retrospect that when the time for the Battle of The Decades came around Tom was not among the fourteen players granted an invitation initially. Having won $335,405 altogether he was still very high on the Jeopardy leader board of winning, ahead not only of several Tournament of Champions winners from that decade but basically everyone else who got an invitation – with the exception of Roger Craig, Dan Pawson and Colby Burnett.

To be fair when the time came for voting on fan favorites for the 2010s (the fans were allowed to vote between five choices for the fifteenth spot) Tom was invited back. That being said when you consider who the other four nominees were it makes Tom look horrible by comparison:

Kara Spak had won five games immediately following Roger’s appearance and just over $83,401. She was a semifinalist in the 2011 Tournament of Champions, qualified for a wild card spot (she lost to Roger Craig) and lost in the semifinals to Buddy Wright who finished third to Roger and Tom.

Ryan Chaffee had won four games in 2009 and $91,900. He was thrashed in his quarter-final.

Erin McLean (2010 College Champion) In the 2011 College Championship she lost to Buddy Wright and was runover in the semi-finals – by Tom Nissley in his win.

Joey Beachum (2008 College Champion). Joey  competed in the 2010 Tournament of Champions. (He was unavailable to play in the 2009 Tournament. He was thrashed in his quarter-final match.

Now a personal disclosure. In 2013 when the Battle of the Decades was announced while I was very familiar with Jeopardy I was not entirely the scholar I am today for reasons not worth discussing. That said I was familiar, due to my past experience as well as previous tournaments with the overwhelming majority of the players extended invitations to each of the three decades represented and would have been able to defend in a public forum the selection of the vast majority of those invited. And though because of my issues with technology in 2013 I didn’t get to vote in the fan favorites I could have made a case for every one of the five players considered a fan favorite for the 1980s and all but one in the 1990s.

I have no memory of what I thought of about the five players chosen for the 2000s but based on the records here, this is a clear case of ‘one of these things is not like the other.” It seemed unfair that Tom Nissley given his record on the show had been reduced to being picked this way.

And apparently the fans themselves felt that same way as Tom was in fact the one who received the most votes. Tom appeared in the first game of Round 1 against none other than Colby Burnett and the winner of the 2007 Tournament of Champions Celeste DiNucci.

Tom played well in the Jeopardy round up to a pint and then began to struggle. He was at $2600 and in second place at the end of the round. Then in Double Jeopardy Celeste and Colby caught fire and Tom wasn’t able to ring in until the eighteenth clue of the round and was only able to give four correct responses. He was still in contention going into Final Jeopardy with $7400 to Celeste’s $16,200 and Colby’s $16,400 which had to make how Final Jeopardy played out all the more excruciating for him.

The category was OPERA & LITERATURE: “An aria in this Shakespeare-based opera says: “Di scozia a te promettono le profetesse il trono…Che tardi?” Tom wrote down his response very quickly and it was the correct response: “What is Macbeth?” Alex translated: “The witches promise you the Scottish throne…what are you waiting for?” Tom added $6000 to his total.

Celeste’s response was: “What is Falstaff?’ (Right composer, wrong opera.” However she waged $1399, leaving her with $14,801. She was clearly playing to beat Tom by $1 if she was incorrect and he was right and bet everything. But Colby was even smarter: he wrote an incorrect response but wagered only $199. When it was over he dropped his head to the podium in relief. Tom had to go home with $5000.

Just for fun let’s see where Dan and Tom were compared with all of the biggest money winners (aside from the Big Three at the time) who were invited back to the All-Star Challenge at that time:

 

Matt Jackson: $511,612

Julia Collins: $478.100

Austin Rogers: $461,000

David Madden: $440, 400

Dan Pawson: $430,902

Ben Ingram: $426,534

Buzzy Cohen: 414,603

Colby Burnett: $375,000

Alex Jacob: $399,802

Tom Nissley: $340,405

Larissa Kelly: $327,597

 

Obviously Tom and Dan are still among the greatest Jeopardy players in the show’s history and considering their past interactions with many of the players who were invited back to the All-Star Challenge there would have been the kind of shared history that so many of those who were invited already. Alan Lin went into the All-Star Games with a (only half-joking) single minded mission to ‘absolutely crush Buzzy Cohen’ and you could imagine Tom feeling a similar desire towards a couple of players who were invited back. Dan might have been more sanguine but Brad did humiliate him in the Battle of the Decades (though to be fair, he did that everybody)

A month after the All-Star Games ended Jeopardy would be changed forever by two different events: Alex Trebek announced his diagnosis with the pancreatic cancer that would kill him. And on April 4th James Holzhauer made his first appearance. Jeopardy would never be the same afterwards.

In the penultimate article in this series I will tell the saga of Jason Zuffranieri, the greatest Jeopardy player you’ve probably never heard of.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment