Note:
This article could just as easily appear in other series I have written – it could fit in the Disruption Series, my arguments
with extremists, even TV criticism. I am including it as part of this series
for two reasons. The obvious one is that, as you’ll see, it deals directly with
both education and the way both sides turn it into a war. The other is because
Sorkin is far more upfront about it and makes the kind of arguments that you honestly
think need to be listened to.
As
I mentioned in a previous article every Thanksgiving my family and I rewatch
the ‘Shibboleth’ episode of The West Wing.
In that article, I mentioned how it took me years to realize the
deeper meaning behind one of the subtle arguments Sorkin was making.
The
article in this series is about a point that the viewer picks up fairly
immediately and has as much context today as it did almost a quarter of a
century. It deals with the flashpoint of religion and education, but it makes
it very clear that there are far more sides to this than the black and white
that the talking points will tell you.
As
the episode begins Josh tells C.J. that they are holding off announcing the
recess appointments because they want to add one more name: Josephine McGarey,
Leo’s sister. When C.J. asks Josh if this was about Leo, Josh says with slight
glee: “This is about Toby picking a fight on school prayer.” “He’ll get one,”
C.J. says. The rest of this story is fundamentally focused between Toby and
Leo.
We
first see Toby discussing in it the Oval Office with the President. It’s clear
that Bartlet does not like the idea that much. Toby (Richard Schiff) tries to
argue that it’s not patronage if she’s qualified and Josie is – she’s a
respected educator, the former superintendent of schools in Atlanta and a
significant Democrat. Bartlet reminds him the recess appointment is used because
it assumes the Senate will have no problem with the nominee. “They will have a significant
problem with this nominee.” Toby says this is about starting a debate on
school prayer, but that’s not the only reason. Bartlet says he’s known her for
over twenty years and ‘he thinks she ‘All About Eve’.
This
reference will not make a lot of sense to those who get the majority of Sorkin’s
references. For those who might not know the movie, Eve Harrington is an
aspiring actress who becomes a star after worming her way into the life of several
creative people and is willing to climb over innocent people to get there. Toby
deflects by saying: “I wouldn’t cast her in a play” but he doesn’t realize the
deeper meaning. He will soon.
Leo
(John Spencer) knows the moment that Bartlet tells him she’s on the list. He
asks if she called the President. When he tells him no, his reaction is: “I’m
amazed.” Toby says she called him. “I’m less amazed.” Then he gets the real
problem: “Don’t get on Toby’s band wagon. It’ll take you to a place we are not
prepared to go.” Toby and Leo spar and Toby says he will take the meetings with
Republican leadership who will tell him very quickly how dumb an idea this is.
In
the second act, Toby does meet with
aides to Republican leadership. Toby sometimes can have a certain amount of
arrogance and he goes into this meeting with the same level of it. He lectures
the aides on how the recess appointment work, degrades them when they mention
Josephine badly and dances around what the problem is with her. When they tell
him you know what, he says: “I do, but I’d like to hear you say it.” When they
say she’s anti-religion, he cheerfully tells them she’s the deacon at her church
and teaches Sunday school. Finally they say: “she’s against prayer in school.”
Toby’s
reaction is blasé: “ You know who else is against school prayer. The Court of Appeals.
And your problem with her is when she was in superintendent she enforced the
law.” When one of the aides points out that somewhere between fifty and sixty
percent of the people think its wrong, Toby tells him: “Laws don’t work that
way! We don’t ask for a show of hands!” (Remember a Democrat is saying this in 2000.
How far we haven’t come.)
At
the peak of his bluster he tells the aides that if they want to wage this
fight, it will give them a second term: “But not because I’m right and you’re
wrong – even though I am and you are – but because I’m just a little better at
this than you.” Then one of the aide speaks up and tells him: “Not this time.
This is a photograph of her.” When Toby asks what she’s doing, he says three
words: “Enforcing the law.”
The
third act is where all of this ends up playing out and it is the biggest reason
this article is here and now in another series. Toby is trying to spin this for
Leo saying that this is a photo of Josie breaking up several students praying.
Leo goes into detail saying that: “It is a photo of her standing next to two
cops, handcuffing two students who are kneeling for prayer, and one of the cops
has his hand on his night stick.” Toby weakly says: “It’s not good.” Leo goes
in for the kill: “One of the students is in his marching band uniform. One
of the students is black. And you’re saying it’s not good? That’s a penetrating
analysis from the White House communications director.”
Leo
then tells his secretary to get his sister on the phone. When she leaves he
said: “I begged you not to do this.” He laughs off the excuse Toby says that
the post needed to be filled and Toby finally gets the core of why he did this:
“It brings the problem front and center.” Exasperated Leo says: “Great! And
what prize do we get for that?”
Leo’s
statement is yet another example of the difference between trying to govern in
a rational and civilized manner and how many extremists - in this case, those on the left who feel very
strongly about issues like this – think its better to argue for issues they think
are relevant and lose badly on them then to try and have fights that aren’t
winnable. I mentioned in my previous article on Shibboleth that Josie tells Leo
she doesn’t shrink for a fight and Leo says she looks for them. As someone who
has read to much by the left – and that includes so much about education - they are doing this not to solve problems
but to start fights.
Leo
then tells Josie that she has to withdraw her name from consideration in order
to make sure the President doesn’t look bad by having to do the same. Josie is
angry about it and their argument gets to the core of what so many battles in
society are waged - and how it is seen
by those who shout the loudest and those who have to govern.
Leo
tells Josie about the picture and when she denies knowing, she says: “There were
a lot of pictures.” Leo tells her this one is special. She knows it the
handcuffs, but still tries to fight. Leo then tells her that a few years ago on
a campaign strong through the south, he met a photographer who told him that he
had Josie to thank for launching his career in photojournalism. Josie still
pleas ignorance and then Leo shouts: “Look at the attribution on the photo! You
called the press in!”
Now
you could argue that all of this is just another story of posturing, except
Sorkin gives Leo and Toby two speeches that make it very clear that they are
not just looking at it from the perspective of politics. Leo says about the
kids she is handcuffing: “These kids are remarkable in this day and age. These
kids are phenomenal. Now there are laws and they need to be enforced. But
we do not strut ever!”
Sorkin
is saying as directly as he ever does (and he can be very blunt) that the proxy
battles so many on both sides wage have an all-too human cost. We never see Josephine again on the show, but its far too easy to
imagine a world where she uses this as a path to run for elected office,
perhaps governor. She would use it to say that she might have a relative in the
Bartlet White House but they wouldn’t hire her because she spoke the truth to
power. She already said she had the AFT
and NEA lined up to fight for her for this appointment, I imagine she could
have done the same even with this photo.
I could see so many leftist newspapers using photos like these as
marketing strategies, saying she was standing up to the right on religion. That
she was willing to throw teenagers in jail for it might give some pause, but I
imagine they’d shrug it off by saying: :It’s in the South and these aren’t the
good ones.” Considering that so much politics has become about ‘strutting’,
they’d consider it an argument in her favor.
What
makes this episode remarkable is that when Josie leaves Toby comes into Leo’s
office and admits his error and that Josie was the wrong face for this. Then he
tells Leo exactly why you want the problem front and center, that it’s not
about separation of church and state, it’s not abstract. Leo asks what it is
about and Toby says one of the most memorable few lines Sorkin’s ever written:
“It’s
about the fourth grader who gets beat up because he sat out the voluntary
prayer. It’s about a way of making kids different from other kids when they’re
legally required to be there. The fourth-grader that’s the prize.”
Leo
asks Toby: “What did they do you?” Toby doesn’t answer. He doesn’t have to. We
know he’s Jewish and that this battle was one in a long line he’s had to fight
his whole life. Leo acknowledged. “You’re right about that part. That part should
be talked about more often.”
Those
two lines of dialogue are why I have included this article in the education
series. So many of the battles that are being fought in schools are essentially
proxy battles that do not take children into consideration at all. The Republican
aides see it that way, and it’s clear that Josie herself has done so. Leo is the
White House Chief of Staff and he does have larger political considerations to
consider, but when he tells Josie about the photo he makes it clear that he is
very aware of the cost of these kinds of stunts. Similarly Toby may be using
Josie in order to wage a political vendetta of his, but when he reveals that
this isn’t just ‘his problem’ as Leo suggested at one point he cuts to the core
of why this is something that needs to be put at the forefront of these
battles.
I
think that so many of the arguments that are being put forth about education
today is posturing and proxy battles. Both sides are willing to arguing at the
top of their lungs that this is for the good of the children and never listens
to them at all. Leo points this out to Josie when he brings up the photo and I
can’t help but think there’s a similar level of posturing when we see, saying,
photos of school libraries with empty shelves or arguments about curriculum. I
grant you these are bad things for the students but as Toby puts it “they’re legally required to be
there’ and many probably wouldn’t give a damn.
It's
why I look at all of the arguments about the ‘threats students’ face from the
religious right and the radical left as what it truly is: proxy battles with
our children involved in fights they didn’t ask to be in, probably don’t care
about and are fundamentally irrelevant to the issues involved. That’s what I’m
going to get to when I finally deal with the issue that we are talking about a
lot but never from the people of those who it affected the most.
No comments:
Post a Comment