Author’s Note: This was
originally meant to be a two-part article but because the stories involved are
more complicated then can be summed up in a single article, I’ve decided to
write three separate articles, possibly a fourth, in the lead-up to the Tournament
of Champions. Many of the names in this article will be familiar to recent fans
of Jeopardy as the majority of them have appeared in the Jeopardy Invitational
Tournament this past March or I have advocated for their inclusion in future
tournaments in my previous articles on Jeopardy. I will do my best not to
regurgitate past articles whenever possible.
I was eagerly
anticipating the 2013-2014 season of Jeopardy well before it began. By that
point I had been watching the show long enough to know that they had a history
of doing Tournament on significant anniversaries of the show’s run and since
the 30th season was coming I expected the same.
I was proven correct as
early in October the Battle of the Decades was announced and the show began
preparing for what was the best postseason tournament in its history to that
point. What I had no idea of knowing – what no Jeopardy fan could have known –
was that before the first round of that Tournament started, the show was going
to witness the arrival of the kind of champion the show hadn’t seen in nearly a
decade.
On January 28, 2014
Arthur Chu then a compliance analyst from Ohio, made his first appearance on
Jeopardy. He won $37,200 in his first game and when the week ended he’d won
$102,800 in four games.
He then had to wait
three weeks for his next appearance as the first round of the Battle of The
Decades took place, followed immediately afterwards by the 2014 College
Championship. (This was won by Terry O’Shea, who we’ll actually be talking
about later in this same article.
When regular season
play returned on February 24, he promptly won five consecutive games, all but
the last runaway victories and on the eighth game he won $58,200. After win
number nine he had to then wait another week to defend his title as the
1990s round of the Battle of The Decades was taking place. He then promptly won
two more runaway games. Finally on March 12th his remarkable run
came to an end after eleven wins and $297, 200 in earnings.
I’m honestly more
impressed Arthur did as well as he did with so many layoffs between his
appearances then his actual record which is remarkable in itself. At the end of
his run he was now in third place all time in both games won and money won in a
Jeopardy players original appearance. His approach to the game was clearly
modeled after Roger Craig as Alex pointed out talking to Roger during his
appearance during the Battle of the Decades. He went to the bottom of the
board, sought out the Daily Double and bet big on them. It had worked for him
with the same level of success as it had for Roger and for longer.
It had been almost nine
years since any player had won this many games on Jeopardy. It would be less
than six weeks before someone arrived who won that many games – and then some.
Julia Collins didn’t
seem like a great Jeopardy player when she won her first game on April 21st,
barely inching out a victory over two game winner Frederique Delapree. By the
end of the week she was still there having won over $100,000. She was also
there at the end of the following week with 10 wins and $220,610.
Then like Arthur her
run was interrupted by the Battle of the Decades, in this case for the final
two weeks of the tournament. She was back on May 19th – and picked
up right where she left off. Slowly and methodically she kept winning games and
money. At the end of that week she had fifteen wins and over $300,000. On May
29 she had nineteen wins, tying David Madden’s second place mark. The next day
she outpaced him. Her luck only held one more day as she was unseated by Brian
Loughnane after 20 wins and $428,100.
This was not only one
of the greatest performances in Jeopardy history but the best for a female
contestant by a long shot: the previous record in games won by a female
contestant had been set the previous season when Stephanie Jass won seven
games. Julia was a more traditional type of Jeopardy player than Arthur,
starting at the top of categories and waiting until they were done before
moving on to the next one. She didn’t seek Daily Doubles out and she was far
more conservative in her wagers than Arthur had been. She was methodical in her
skill, rarely winning enormous sums of money in her wins the way later
super-champions did. No one, certainly not me, could deny her dominance or
effectiveness.
Around this time – as
much in regard to the Battle of the Decades as the arrival of Arthur and Julia
– the idea of trying to figure out who
the greatest players in Jeopardy history was starting to take root in my mind.
Writing about it in some fashion hadn’t occurred to me but I was starting to
take it more seriously then the casual Jeopardy viewer or even the long time
fan. In a sense the Battle of The Decades was solidifying the idea because by
the end of it Alex himself had referred to the three finalists – Brad Rutter,
Ken Jennings and Roger Craig – as perhaps the three most significant players in
Jeopardy history. Roger had the one-day record, Ken had won the most games and
Brad, by virtue of his wins in the Million Dollars Masters and the Ultimate
Tournament of Champions, had won the most money. When the finals were over and
Brad had emerged victorious – again – Brad, Ken and Roger were ranked first,
second and third in all-time money won. By finishing third in the Tournament
Roger had earned $50,000 which put his total winnings to that point at
$530,200.
So around the time of
the next Tournament of Champions the following November I knew that it was
significant in a way that past ones hadn’t been. If either Arthur or Julia won
the grand prize of $250,000, they would vault ahead of Roger and become the third
highest money winner in Jeopardy history. That being said I was also in a
position that no fan of Jeopardy had ever been into that point: there were two
champions who’d won more than ten games in this tournament and I’m not sure
anybody could honestly have told you at the time which one had a better chance
of winning the grand prize.
Like everyone else I
assumed that one would end up winning the Tournament. However I didn’t believe
for a moment that it would be easy for either to get to the finals if for no
other reason that even without the two of these super-champions the 2014 TOC roster
was incredibly, almost ridiculously strong.
For one thing, there
was only one player in the entire roster who had won fewer than five
games. (I’ll exclude the College Champions and the winner of the Teachers
Tournament in this list.) Three players had won six games: Andrew Moore, Sandie
Baker and Jared Hall. And in what may have been the biggest sign of how changes
were coming, there were also two eight game winners: Drew Horwood, who
won $138,100 in March of 2013 and Ben Ingram, who’d won $176,534 in July of
that year. In almost every previous Tournament of 2007 to 2013 they would have
been the leaders in games won. In the 2014 TOC, they were tied for third place.
In his first appearance
Arthur started slowly against Andrew Moore and Rani Pfeiffer. But in Double
Jeopardy Arthur resumed his natural dominance and by the end of Double Jeopardy
had $21,000 amassed a runaway victory. He made it look easy.
“20-time Jeopardy
champion” (that was how Julia introduced herself in the Tournament of Champions
actually started out stronger and led practically from beginning to end against
Joshua Brakhage and Jim Coury, the winner of the 2013 College Champions
participating that year. Going into Final Jeopardy she had $16,200 to Joshua’s
$11,800.
And then in Final
Jeopardy it went wrong. The category was THE US CONSTITUTION: “The three Latin
phrases found in the Constitution are ‘pro tempore’, ‘ex post facto’ & this
legal 2-word phrase.” Jim and Joshua both knew the correct response: “What is
habeus corpus?” Julia wrote down: “What is magna gloria?” That cost her $7100
and dropped to her to second place with $9100. Her only hope was for a wild
card spot.
She got in – by the
skin of her teeth. The four high scores for non-winners made it in and she had
the fourth highest score.
Redemption came for
Julia in her semi-final match which was played against Terry O’Shea, the winner
of the 2014 College Championship and Jared Hall who’d won six games and an
impressive $181,001 in the course of them. Both Terry and Jared had won their quarterfinal
matches so Julia was, at least theoretically, the odd one out.
Again Julia took an
early lead and managed to hold it throughout the game, helped by a mistake by
Jared on a Daily Double early in Double Jeopardy that he never came back from.
She had $12,000 at the end of Double Jeopardy to Terry’s $8200 and Jared’s $7600.
It came down to Final
Jeopardy and the category THE OTHER SIDE OF THE GLOBE: “This capital city,
which at 12,330 miles is farthest from Madrid, is named for a soldier who spent
time in Madrid.” Julia was the only player who knew the correct response: “What
is Wellington?” (the capital of New Zealand named for the Duke of Wellington.)
Arthur won his
semi-final game somewhat more convincingly though it wasn’t as easy as Julia’s
victory. The third semi-finalist would turnout to be Ben, who ran away with his
semi-final match. All three players managed to be the only player to get Final
Jeopardy correctly though in Ben’s case, he was the only one who took it
seriously.
As Alex himself
remarked in the introductions to the first game of the finals Ben, Julia and
Arthur were already an impressive field: combined they had already won 39 games
and just over $900,000. The first game of the finals was one of the greatest
games I’ve seen played in a Tournament of Champions in over thirty years of
watching the show.
In the Jeopardy round
of Game 1 Ben and Arthur spent much of the match battling for supremacy and it
wasn’t until the end of the round that Arthur pulled ahead with $8400 to Ben’s
$6400. Julia struggled throughout the round and finished in a distant third
with $2400.
Julia managed to change
her fortune early in Double Jeopardy with a category that the show rarely goes
back to: “INITIALS TO ROMAN NUMERALS TO NUMBERS.” Alex explained: “I’ll give
you an example. If we said, ‘French bag maker,” that would be Louis Vuitton. We
take the letters LV, and that translates to what number? 55.”
Julia went right for it
and found the Daily Double in it. She bet the $4400 she had:
“For the judge best
known for the 1994 O.J. Simpson Case.” She responded: “What is 51?” (LI, Lance
Ito.) She was right back in it.
The round was fundamentally
dominated by Julia and Arthur with Ben only able to ring in four times the
entire round. He made them count and got $6400 out of them.
By the end of the round
Arthur had been superb with 29 correct responses and just one mistake the
entire game. He’d accumulated $25,600. But Julia and Ben were anything but
quiet: Julia finished the round with $18,200 and Ben with $12,800.
Now I should mention
that while I’ve had a lot of luck with Final Jeopardy throughout the Tournament
of Champions over the last decade, I have always found their Final Jeopardys in
the two-game finals ludicrously difficult. So, it’s worth noting, did the three
contestants during that period. Such was the case here.
The category for Game 1
was 20th CENTURY PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS: “In this year, there were
no presidents or vice presidents running but three of the 4 men on the 2 major
party ballots would later become President.”
After the music ended
and the lights went up, Alex acknowledged: “This was a tough one.” Ben’s
response was revealed first: “What is 1920?” He was correct. Harding won the President;
Coolidge would ascend to the White House after Harding’s death and the
Democratic Vice President that year was FDR. Ben gambled and bet everything to
double his score. Julia had guessed 1952. And it cost her $11,800. Arthur
thought it was 1932 and he lost $10,000. In the blink of an eye the tables were
turned: Ben was in the lead with $25,600, Arthur was in second with $15,600 and
Julia trailed with $6400.
In Game 2 Ben got off
to a fast start in the Jeopardy round but Arthur managed to catch and pass him
on his last correct response. At the end of it Arthur had a narrow lead with
$4200 to Ben’s $3800 and Julia, who struggled throughout, had $1200.
Arthur got off to a
fast start in Double Jeopardy and had a chance to pick up a lot of lost ground when
he found the first Daily Double in McWRITERS. He bet the $7000 he had: “In 1962
‘Marshall McLuhan wrote ‘Electronic Independence recreates the world in the
image of a global’. Arthur guessed: “What is ‘web” when it was village. (No one
I should mention got a single clue correct in this category including yon
scribe at home.) Arthur recovered by finding the other Daily Double and by the
end of the round he had moved back into the lead with $10,400 to Julia’s $7600
and Ben’s $6600. Julia’s low score meant she wouldn’t be contended for anything
other than second place and that it was between Arthur and Ben for the grand
prize.
The deciding Final Jeopardy
dealt with SHAKESPEAREAN GEOGRAPHY. It too was a mother: “Of the 5 cities
mentioned in Shakespeare play titles, it’s the only one not found in Europe.” Alex
acknowledged it was a tough one.
Ben wrote down: “What
is Cairo?” As Alex pointed out Cairo didn’t appear in a Shakespeare title. Ben
lost $4201, bringing him down to $2399. His two-day total was now $27,999.
Julia couldn’t come up with anything. She lost $2000 and guaranteed herself a
third place position.
It was all on Arthur. His
response was: “What is Thebes?” As Alex explained afterwards the play was Pericles,
Prince of Tyre. (That city is located in what is now Lebanon.) That Arthur
had bet everything was irrelevant; Ben was already ahead of him and it was Ben
who became the winner of the 2014 Tournament of Champions.
It’s hard to consider
Ben’s performance an upset, considering that he’d played by far the best of all
three finalists. He won both his quarterfinal match and semi-final in fairly
convincing fashion and was the only contestant to give a correct response in Final
Jeopardy in either Final. Arthur played exceptionally throughout the entire
Tournament, no question, but Ben was clearly as good as him at least in the
Jeopardy rounds.
At the time I was by
far the most stunned by how disappointing Julia’s performance overall had been:
she only got one Final Jeopardy correct in all four games she played, backed
into the semi-finals and with the sole exception of her quarterfinal, she didn’t
play particularly well. Though I didn’t know it until a few years later Julia’s
performance was a harbinger of how super-champions have generally performed
once they reach the Tournament of Champions. It always seemed to be a slog for
them to get past the quarterfinals and luck was often far more important than
skills.
It must also be said
that along with being a short series this is a lineup of the best of the best
and none of the players were undeserving of being there. Once you get to the
TOC, it doesn’t matter if you’ve won five games or twenty, you’re all starting
out at the same place. I’d learned that with David Madden; I’d clearly
forgotten it when it came to Julia – and like all Jeopardy fans, I’d have to
keep learning this lesson.
In the next article in
this series I will deal with the incomparable Matt Jackson who seemed like an
unstoppable force in his original run – only to come face to face in the 2015 Tournament
of Champions with an immovable object.
No comments:
Post a Comment