Last night I endured
one of the most painful cancellations of a TV series I’ve had to endure in
2023. I was planning to write in reaction to it that night, but then I learned
that there were more details not only to why it was cancelled but why the
network itself was doing so.
I have also been
meaning to begin a series for the past several months in which I try to reconcile
the divide between what critics and consumers think Hollywood is and what it
actually is. As you will see when I begin this article properly, last night’s
cancellation is as pertinent an entryway into subject as I could have hoped
for.
So this article will be
the first in what will be a continuing series on the divide between how we
should view Hollywood and how most people do.
Those of you who have
read my blog know that there are few people out there who have thought more
highly of Freeform’s anthology series Cruel Summer. When it debuted in
April of 2021, I regarded it as one of the great accomplishment of that year
and gave the newly founded HCA TV awards full points for not merely nominating
it for Best Cable Drama but actually giving in their inaugural prize in that
category. I named the series the best
show of 2021 and was overjoyed when it was renewed for a second season.
I was just as ecstatic in
the leadup to Season 2 and to when it actually aired. It is one of my favorite
series of 2023 and will be among the top five series of this year, if not among
the top three. So you can imagine
how devastated I was to learn that Freeform had cancelled it last night.
This is the kind of
blow that would normally have wrecked me for days, if not weeks. However, when
I was doing research for the article I was considering right I learned two
things that numbed the pain in different ways.
The first was that Cruel
Summer had originally just been planned to be a one-shot and that the
series had been such a huge hit (the biggest success Freeform had ever had)
they had decided to renew it for a second season, this time as an anthology.
So, while it is still a huge blow that Cruel Summer is gone, I am at
least gratified that we got the second season in the first place.
The second thing is the
reason this article is being written. I was so stunned at the cancellation of Cruel
Summer that I barely registered that Good Trouble, an iconic series
that had been going on for nearly five seasons, had also been abruptly canceled
before the writers had been able to finish it.
I imagine this will come as a blow to far more people considering that
in addition to being a successful series, Good Trouble was a spinoff of
another huge success for Freeform The Fosters. This will rock a significant amount of TV fans’
worlds – though maybe it should neither it nor Cruel Summer’s
cancellation should come as a shock based on another event that happened earlier
this summer.
This June Freeform also
cancelled two series that I was very fond of. The first was its freshman
thriller The Watchful Eye, a brilliant mix of intrigue and possibly
horror set in a New York Hotel involving a suspicious death and a new arrival among
a prominent family. I thought very highly of this series (if you read my column
you know how much I thought of it) and it bothered me that it had been cancelled
before it got a chance to grow.
The bigger blow by far was
the cancellation of Single Drunk Female which was a scalding comedy with
Sofia D’Elia playing a millennial trying both to get sober and deal with her wrenching
family and friend situation. The fact that both of these shows were canceled
this spring should have been a big flashing light that more cancellations were
on their way; last night’s cancellations were the other shoe dropping.
Now some inside
baseball. The head of Freeform’s original programming, who greenlit all of
these shows, left the network last year. The only original series left on
Freeform is grown-ish which will air its final episodes in 2024.
None of this is a
coincidence when you take into context an article I read in the Wall Street
Journal earlier this year. Freeform’s parent company, Disney, is as we all know,
in the midst of some major financial restructuring. In this article, I learned
that company was starting to make hard choice as to which of its networks and
services were going to continue to broadcast original program. The fact that Disney
Plus and Hulu are merging was one sign of how the industry was changing; that
some of its cable networks will stop making original series altogether is
another.
So taken in this very
large context, while the cancelation not only of Cruel Summer but every
Freeform had been airing for the last three years is devastating from an
artistic standpoint, it is not the least bit shocking from a financial one. And
it is keeping in the general theme that has been going on for years that I
myself have commented on of cable networks increasingly getting out of the
business of making original programming.
Now I imagine all of
you TV viewers who have been upset that so many shows are being killed are
blaming either cable or the parent companies for doing so. You are grossly
incorrect. In fact, this is the
inevitable consequence of why so many critics tended to think Prestige TV
worked so well. Every cable network seemed to be creating a brilliant show and
they seemed to be going on forever.
But the bill was always
going to come due. The fragmentation of the TV audience may have been willing
to lead to great creativity but it always going to come at a cost. Any business – and lest we forget television
is one – can only continue to exist as long as it is making a profit for the
investors. It has always been the way since there were only three networks; it
was just as true when dozens of networks were providing it.
And eventually when it
was time to cut costs or the budgets ran in the red, these networks basically
had two options:
1. They could stop making
original programming altogether.
2. They could be bought
out or merge with another larger company.
Critics and audiences have
never understood that there is no third option where they keep on making your
favorite show until the network closes down and ceases to exist. To be clear,
that’s happened in a few cases but most of the audiences will shrug it off when
it does.
This is what critics
and viewers have never truly understood or appreciated about everything that
entertains them. I realize trying to feel sympathy for a corporate entity may
be beneath any real progressive but an institution is not one person and it is
not all the billionaires at the top. And
they are not just making a single product for you and you alone. If not enough
people are going to Bob’s Big Boy, it disappears from truck stops. If no one goes
to see the A’s play baseball, they have to move to Oakland. And if almost no
one is watching The Winchesters or Stargirl, the CW has to start
importing Canadian dramas if it is to exist in any form.
Nor am I going to blame
the streaming services that have taken away jobs from cable or other services.
No the fault, as always, lies not in the network but in ourselves. Really it
lies in the entire nature of how life is today.
We want our food, our packages and yes, our entertainment as quick and as
cheaply as possible.
So yes, it could be bad
for art if there are only a handful of places where brilliant creative shows can
be made. But the average American will not give a damn as long as they can pay
as little as possible to get it. This was the way when there were only three
major networks to get TV from. This has
always been the way with TV, film and plays. The critics care about art, the
talent and investors care about making money, and the public cares about being
entertained. The fundamental flaw of so
many critics is that they think their approach is the only acceptable one and
they blame the other two groups for not having the ‘intelligence’ the see it
the way they do.
I’ve always been more
of the opinion, as a TV critic, that I view my work more as the public does
then as the critic has. I don’t come to
any major TV show – whether it be The Wire or Only Murders in the Building
or yes, Cruel Summer -
expecting to find some great work of art. I want to be entertained first and
foremost. I want to have fun. I would like to have my brain stimulated and my
heart strings pulled. All of this can be done just as easily with lowbrow TV as
highbrow. I’ve always felt it you get enjoyment from a program you shouldn’t be
judged whether its Station 19 or Station Eleven. One group of
people might think highly of the latter than the former but that doesn’t make
them the final word. I’m going to go
into this in more detail in future articles but critics are not gods but human
beings, capable of their own flaws and prejudices. We should never blindly
follow their judgments.
Similarly we must also
remember that TV has always been a business and any businesses job is to make
money. As a TV critic I get reminded of this perhaps more frequently and
painfully than any one else. Year after
year, you have to endure the fact that the shows you love and invested time in
will not becoming back next season because while you may love them, not enough
of the rest of the world does. It doesn’t get easier if shows you like survive
season after season; the more invested in them you become, the larger the risk is
they will end up falling by the wayside. Peak TV may have done much to improve
the art of TV but its done nothing to ensure job security or that the show’s
you love will keep on surviving in an era where the margin for renewal can
differ depending on which network or service your on.
In that sense, the
truly remarkable shows that stand as critical classics – The Americans, Parenthood,
Damages are among my favorites of these – are remarkable in the fact
that they survived long enough to realize their vision. Peak TV might have been a great time for art
but there was no more guarantee the show you loved would survive any more than
many of the characters on it.
So yes it will be
harder for great artistic series to succeed and thrive in the years to come. How
is that different from any point in the history of television? TV has always
been driven by the number of eyeballs who are on the screen. The only thing
that changed in the last twenty years was that a show could be a hit with far
fewer eyeballs than there were with each passing decade.
As for how I’ll deal
with the loss of Cruel Summer, last night I managed to finally track
down a DVD of the first season online. I paid about $30 for it. I’ll do the
same when the second season comes out on DVD in some form. I’m doing this in
part because this how I appreciate my art; I’m always felt that you owe it as a
viewer to have both a record of your favorite shows in something that isn’t
digital and you should be willing to pay some form of largesse to show your
appreciation. I recognize TV is an art, but I also respect that is a business
and I think we should all remember to do the same.
No comments:
Post a Comment