Mrs. Claypool: “I’ve
been sitting at this table for forty-five minutes.”
Otis B.
Driftwood: “Yes, with your back to me. When I have dinner with a woman I expect
her to look at my face. That’s the price she has to pay!”
And that was my
introduction to Groucho Marx at the age of eight.
To say that the
Marx Brothers would get cancelled today goes without saying; the only reason
they managed to get away with as much as they did in their movie career was
probably because most viewers could not comprehend what they were actually
doing. So much of what they did in an hour and a half – and those were often
their long films – went by so fast and furiously that I’m pretty sure half of
it went over the audiences head. There were, however, no dissatisfied customers
because the parts they got were so brilliant that the audience was laughing
hysterically at it when it happened.
I can’t imagine
for the life of me what it is must have been like to watch the Marx Brothers
when they were doing vaudeville or performing on stage. I’ve seen the movie
versions of their first two plays The Coconuts and Animal Crackers so
many times as a youth there are still passages I have committed to memory. That
might appall the Marx Brothers because according to reports, in the original
productions Groucho and Chico would change the lines so many times their
supporting cast almost had no idea what they were going to say when they came
out on stage each night. It must have been like performing with four different
Robin Williams and each one had a completely different set of lines. The movie
versions of their plays and the nine films they subsequently made in the decade
that followed must be the restrained versions of their insanity possible. I
sometimes pity the screenwriters who were given credit for their films over
their years; how much of their scripts could have survived two minutes of the
brothers looking at it, ripping pages out and saying: “We’ll do what we’re
going to do.”
I don’t think
I’ll get much argument that comedy on the screen, when done well, has a far greater
lasting power then drama. Certain elements that have entered the zeitgeist are
more from comedy: Charlie Chaplin’s Tramp character, Harold Lloyd
climbing a building in Safety Last; Abbott and Costello’s ‘Who’s On
First’ and the wonderful world of Looney
Tunes, Tom and Jerry and all the animated cartoons that served as short
subjects. I have just as much confidence that half a century from now we will
still be quoting the dead parrot sketch and almost everything else we saw in Monty
Python’s Flying Circus.
But the Marx
Brothers managed to transcend even that. Much of this comes from the persona of
Groucho: his mustache and glasses have been copyrighted and sold even for
children who don’t know who he was. When Rob Zombie was doing his horror movies
the characters bore the name of Otis B. Driftwood and Rufus T. Firefly. In the
series finale of Breaking Bad, one of the villains was using ‘Lydia the
Tattooed Lady’ as a ring-tone. And I’m pretty sure there is a universal appeal
to children: the Warners of Animaniacs are for all intents and purposes
the animated Marx Brothers, though they all mix and match elements of all three
of the major characters that you don’t have a one-to-one correlation. But all
of them were as much Groucho as anybody.
The eleven films
the Marx Brothers made between 1929 and 1941 were all hysterically funny. (The
last two they made A Night in Casablanca and Love Happy, made
after the brothers decided to come out of retirement, have moments of
inspiration but are far fewer of the jokes land then they did in their earlier
films.) Many of them are clearly in the
greatest comedies ever made category and even the ones that don’t work
perfectly have moments that leave you in awe. But if I had to pick the one that
is perfect in every way, it’s still the first one I ever saw, which was A
Night at the Opera.
In his Great
Movies collection, Ebert says that Duck Soup is their masterwork and
that A Night at the Opera is ‘lesser’ because of the musical interludes.
There is vast truth in Ebert’s narrative: Duck Soup is hysterical from
the opening credits to the last frame, it’s filled with a comic insanity that
have moments that comedians have been trying to echo ever since, and you can’t
stop laughing from beginning to end. That is, however, also what makes it the most
disorganized movie they ever made. It’s nothing but comic insanity with barely
a structure to hang your hat on and it is absolutely a classic. But I’m pretty
sure that its total insanity is the main reason it was the troops first box
office disaster and led to their careers nearly ending.
Because the film
did bomb, Paramount cancelled their
contract and the brothers didn’t make another film for two years. (That’s
almost certainly why Zeppo ended up leaving the act.) The remaining brothers
went from studio to studio until they ended up at MGM. The story of how they
managed to get a contract there is the kind of thing that would fit in a Marx
Brothers film. The brothers parked themselves in the waiting room of Irving
Thalberg, the wunderkind producer behind so much of MGM’s success who
notoriously never had a meeting with anybody. After waiting two weeks, they
took papers out of the wastebasket and set them on fire. When Thalberg smelled
smoke, he left his office to see the brothers roasting marshmallows over his
wastebasket fire. Impressed by their moxie, Thalberg met with them and signed
them to MGM where they would make six pictures, starting with A Night at the
Opera.
A Night at the
Opera is
a masterpiece for countless reasons but perhaps the best is because it gives an
example of all three archetypes each of the three brothers played in everyone
of their careers. Groucho’s Otis B. Driftwood holds a job with the New York
Opera company and is wooing a wealthy socialite played by the brothers favorite
partner-in-crime, Margaret Dumont. (She appeared in seven of their films always
playing a wealthy socialite with a ridiculous amount of money; in Duck Soup,
her character has so much wealth she’s essentially bailing out an entire
nation.)
As always
Groucho is simultaneously wooing and insulting Dumont’s character for her
money. Unlike all of their other films together, where he’s almost always
trying to marry her, this time its completely professional: he’s trying to get
her as a backer for his boss Herman Gottlieb, played by that wonderful comic
character actor Sig Ruman. Ruman’s characters were always wonderful at playing
people with bluster and egos needing to be punctured; his most famous roles was
in To Be or Not Be as
‘Concentration Camp’ Erhardt, who Jack Benny manages to completely
humiliate.
Gottlieb works
for the New York Opera company and is trying to get money from Claypool to
finance a great tenor from Italy to make his American debut. Driftwood is
working more than Groucho’s characters in most of his film, which is to say the
bare minimum. At the last performance when his carriage pulls up and he’s told
that it’s still going on, he berates his driver: “On account of you, I nearly
heard the opera!”
Groucho Marx is,
of course, the premiere insult comic of all time – every satirical remark is a
dig at the action onscreen – but it’s worth noting that in this film as much as
all the others, all of his insults are directed towards the rich and powerful,
the structures of society, or the true villains of the piece. Groucho is
clearly a social climber who is usually punching above his weight financially
and always trying to con the rich and powerful. Groucho is always berating the
society and authority; he never once does so to the poor or downtrodden, or in
this case, the love interest.
All the Marx
Brothers are essentially playing con men, but different kinds. Chico is
essentially the working class con man, who is essentially salt of the earth and
has less room for pretention than Groucho does. Chico is as much a womanizer as
Groucho is but he never gets in the way of true love; if anything, his
character is always working hard to make sure in runs smoothly. This is true in
A Night at the Opera as much as the others. He plays Fiorello, who has
known Alan Jones’ struggling tenor Ricardo all his life and believes in him. He
agrees to be his manager and laughs when Ricardo tells him he won’t make any
money.” “That’s a fine. I break even. Just as long as I no lose nothing” he
tells him when he signs on.
Most of the
highlights of the Marx Brothers movies come when Groucho and Chico have scenes
together, and A Night at the Opera is no exception. The two of them meet
when both men are putting their legs on a tenor than Harpo has just knocked
unconscious (twice) and the two of them
start having a conversation (“Two beers, bartender,” Groucho begins it).
Groucho believes Chico is the manager of a tenor that’s about to be signed for
$1000 a night and spends it trying to con Chico for $10 a night. The comedy always
comes because invariably Chico’s characters thinks Groucho’s are higher up the
social ladder then they invariably are and that Groucho so badly wants money,
he falls for anything.
After this comes
the classic contract bit, where Groucho and Chico take out the enormous
contracts and the two of them start going through the boilerplate language,
none of which Chico agrees with, no matter how basic: “The party of the first
part…” This bit will make the most
hard-hearted person laugh because it matches
both physical comedy, word play and perfect timing. The last exchange
involving the ‘sanity clause’ has essentially entered comic lore: when The
Santa Clause came out in 1993, Roger Ebert bemoaned the entire film went by
and the punch line from this exchange never got made.
Harpo is the
noble savage, brutal, chasing skirts, always able to contort himself, saying
volumes by saying absolutely nothing, driving everybody around him nuts –
except Chico and Groucho (occasionally). Harpo is essentially a live-action
cartoon, who seems able to do just all the physical comedy the movie requires.
At the climax of the film, he spends much of the time behind the scenes, ripping down scenery,
making havoc onstage blissfully unintentionally (“A battleship in Il Trovatore!’
is just one consequence of his actions). In many ways he is a live-action
pre-cursor of so many of the Warner Brothers Cartoons that were just a few
years away of debuting; the rules of physics never seem to apply to him. At one
point, trying to get away from authority figures, he simply runs up the
curtain in defiance of gravity and manages to get away. You sometimes wonder
how much men like Chuck Jones and Tex Avery took the inspiration for Wile E.
Coyote’s antics or Tom and Jerry’s
simply by watching Harpo Marx in basically any film.
A Night at the
Opera does
have a plot, to be sure, as well as a love story but even this is an advance
forward for the film. During their first five movies, Zeppo had frequently been
the quasi-romantic lead in many of them, and that proved a distraction. Zeppo
was handsome and a decent actor, but his being shifted that way made him seem
as an outsider. It is possible if he had stayed with the act Zeppo would have
continued serving that purpose for the rest of the way. Theoretically I could
have seen him playing Ricardo – like his brothers Zeppo had a good singing
voice and he was handsome – but it would have distracted from the seriousness
of the plot.
There were love
stories in every Marx Brothers film that went forward but I think they helped
their movies. Now their insanity and ridiculousness towards society and the
world had a purpose: they were using their insanity for love as well as money.
I also
appreciate the musical interludes in this film the way I didn’t before. It’s
worth remembering that while Chico and Harpo never took anything seriously when
either sat before their instrument, they were deadly serious. How many movies
would dare pause for a few minutes today just to let a performer play the
piano, much less the harp? Harpo was probably the most skilled musician of the
brothers; in one film he and Chico did a duet on the piano and in The
Coconuts he played a clarinet. These
interludes may have made less sense than the antics onscreen but I imagine most
of it had to do with the Marx Brothers training in vaudeville.
It's a shame
that Groucho doesn’t sing in the film; he was actually a skilled singer and
many of his songs are among the highlights of the films. Songs such as ‘Hurray
for Captain Spaulding’, ‘Hello I Must Be Going’, and of course ‘Lydia the
Tattooed Ladies’ are highlights of his pictures and there were more than a few
other skilled ones. There have been many great Broadway performers who have transitioned
to movies over the years, but the idea of the musical clown has died out. It
was a major factor in comic movies for decades and I will deal with one of the
most undervalued in another review.
But of course
you don’t discuss A Night at the Opera without the stateroom scene, and
it’s worth noting that the brothers build to it gradually. Groucho has a cabin
that compared to the others we’ve seen is barely the size of a closet.
“Tomorrow, you can open the trunk and leave the room,” he says as the porter
leaves. He opens the trunk and Chico, Harpo and Alan Jones have stowed away
having thrown away all his clothes. Driftwood has invited Claypool to his room
and tells them to get out of there, but they insist on being fed.
The scene that
follows would be one of the comic highlights of a lesser movie as Groucho
stands outside his door and places his order, but at the end Chico says: “And
two hardboiled eggs.” After which Harpo (who is asleep) honks his horn and
Groucho says: “Make that three hard-boiled eggs.” Each time he says it gets
funnier and there’s a punch line so great at the end, I won’t spoil it if you
haven’t seen the film because Groucho’s reactions sells it.
Driftwood comes
in and is jovial: “If that steward is deaf and blind, we’ll be fine.” Then the
scene officially begins when three maids come in to make up the room. Slowly
more and more people begin showing up and Driftwood cheerfully invites each one
in no matter what. When a woman asks if he ask for a manicure, he actually
says: “No. Come on in!” Another woman comes in looking for her Aunt Minnie and
asks if she can use the phone: “Use the phone? I’ll lay even money you can’t
get in the room.”
As viewers we’re
aware how crowded the room is getting, and we know the inevitable is coming but
this a case where the punch line is as good as the buildup. In a film studies
course in college, I showed the entire scene to a group of students, saying it was
one of my favorite scenes. I didn’t have to explain why the same way others
did; with each new arrival, the laughter got bigger and bigger.
Like every Marx
Brothers films, A Night at the Opera ends with a hysterical comic
set-piece where all the plot elements are resolved, the bad guys are
humiliated, love triumphs and the Marx Brothers make fun of every single thing
that happens. Groucho climbs all over the opera house, giving commentary as he
tries to escape. Chico and Harpo engage in slapstick everywhere and the bad
guys keep getting hit in the head. And because these are satires and farces, it
is the stiffs and upper class who have to come crawling to the lower class and
as is frequently the case, the same people who have spent the entire film
humiliating them. Indeed, it’s not enough for Gottlieb to have come crawling
back to the brothers, the last gag of the film is of Harpo ripping up his suit
as he does.
I will close
with a personal reminiscence to say what an effect this film has had on me. My
father has loved opera his whole life and I am fond of certain pieces. We’ve
gone to the Met and New York Opera many times. When we discussed this film he
said that the two of us should see Il Trovatore the opera that is being
performed at the climax of the film. I’ll admit I probably should – it is a
masterpiece and well worth seeing. But I told my dad it would probably be
disappointing by comparison. And really, if an opera doesn’t start with the
orchestra suddenly transitioning from
Verdi to ‘Take Me Out To the Ball Game’,
it’s probably going to be a disappointment for most fans.
No comments:
Post a Comment