I've written in some of my other
pieces that I've never really liked the majority of the comic book movies I've
seen in this past century. One of the reasons is simple. I came of age in the
1990s and if you did you grew up in an era where animation after nearly thirty
years of trying with middling results finally completely cracked the code on
comic book adaptations whether they were DC, Marvel and even a few lesser
brands. As a result, adolescents like myself witnessed some of the greatest
animated series based on comic books done so brilliantly that even for people
like me who knew nothing about the lore of comics, any live-action adaptation
could only pale by comparison.
It took until Christopher Nolan
came along for any film director to finally master the world that Batman:
The Animated Series did practically from its first episode. Three different
Spider-Man franchises have never come close to the masterpieces that Spiderman:
The Animated Series did when they set up the Insidious Six by the end of
its first season – something that still hasn't happened in more than twenty
years. And one of the reasons I was never impressed by the MCU was that Spiderman:
The Animated Series had for all intents and purposes gotten that far by the
end of its third season. And as anyone who's watched the recent cinematic
disasters, they completely mastered Michael Morbius, Kraven the Hunter and
Madame Web the first time around. (It also only took them one try to
master Daredevil and The Punisher, too.)
And it really says something that
no matter how many times they try to recreate X-Men, nothing that Bryan
Singer or any of his colleagues have done have some anywhere close to how the
1990s animated series managed to completely land everything you needed to know
about the entire world in the two part series premiere. I remember when I first
saw it at the age of 13. The only thing I knew about X-Men was
through video games and the odd action
figure. But it says a lot that at thirteen I knew this was something
incredible. The fact that the show was willing to kill off Morph in the series
premiere – something live-action TV didn't do to series regulars, let
alone children's animation – showed a level of confidence in the writing and a
willingness to go as dark as possible. To be fair, Morph did return in the
series in a later season (this was, after all, a show based on a comic book)
but that the series was willing to do this with more than a few characters
during its run showed that this wasn't going to be the Disney Afternoon.
Like Spiderman, X-Men was
willing to radicalize the format of the Saturday morning cartoon: they would
have storylines that were resolved in a week as well as a serialized story that
would take up entire seasons or in some cases multiple weeks. They started with
a basic team that we see in the credits and were more than willing to expand it
to some of the more prominent figures: we would see Nightcrawler, Dazzler and
Bishop eventually make appearance for the good guys and Juggernaut, Mister
Sinister and Apocalypse for the villains. The show dealt with the storyline of
Jean Grey and Phoenix – and carried it to its original end – as well as Dark
Phoenix a season later and in both cases did it far better and with a greater
sense of tragedy then either of the attempts to do so in the film franchise.
Indeed, looking at the animated series I find it hard to find a cinematic
equivalent who was better than their cartoon counterpart. This may seem like
heresy to those who love the work of Patrick Stewart as Xavier or Ian McKellen
as Magneto but in both cases they were trying to breath life into stale
scripts. All the characters had far better dialogue and stories to work with in
the animated series. (I won't say the same for Hugh Jackman's work as Wolverine
but it took a while for him to surpass what I saw on the Animated Series.)
If the animated series had just
been willing to make the story about the war between factions of mutants and
other conflicts involving time travel and outer space, it would still have been
a great show. But one of the reasons I recognize the world X-Men live in
is it does take place in the real world. The first three films never shied away
from the darker political implications, the bigotry that all the mutants were
facing, the fact that the President wanted to have them register. The '90s
cartoon could have backed away from it – most television shows in that period
rarely became political. Instead, it leaned into it hard. The show never let us
forget that their were, for all intents and purposes, a KKK against mutants and
the darker implications as to who they were attacking on the streets, the
rallies they held, the purity standards they met. The show acknowledged the
sickness of this by having one of the most virulent anti-mutant bigots have
both his parents be mutants – and two of the greatest villains in the world: Sabretooth
and Mystique. None of this made him hate mutants any less if anything he was
more determined to purify his bloodline by killing them. X-Men was
created in the 1960s and no one can deny the parallels between Xavier and
Magneto as the two sides of civil rights: Xavier preaching cooperation; Magneto
preaching violence and the show never let us forget the reasons why Erik had to
feel the way he did.
This made X-Men '97, a
licensed continuation of the incredible animated series one of the most eagerly
anticipated series of the last year. With both Marvel and DC suffering in a
decline in quality and box office returns of the majority of the films so far
this decade and particularly with all the troubles Disney has had with so many
of the franchises it has taken over in that same period, I have little doubt
people were sure they would ruin a classic. They absolutely didn't: the first
season is currently ranked #95 on imdb.com. It helped that Kevin Feige only had
two conditions: bring back the original voice cast and the rights to the theme
music for the series.
Finally this past week when FXX
began to rerun all of Season 1 (as part of the continued merger of that channel
with Disney+) I managed to get caught up with a show that I wanted to see but
hadn't the time. Now to be clear, had it just been a recreation of the same
thing I might not have been inclined to like it: I've never been a fan of
nostalgia for nostalgia's sake and have in countless other reviews degraded
reboots for that very purpose. I acknowledge some can be better than others (Twin
Peaks, The X-Files) but I don't particularly think we need four seasons of Will
& Grace, Dexter: New Blood and I could have lived without The
Connors. There had to be a reason for X-Men '97 to exist beyond
nostalgia. The first three episodes have given it to me, and I suspect many
others.
I'll admit seeing the original
theme and introduction did much to assuage my doubts about the show being true
to the original in body. The show is a continuation as it takes place one year
after the series finale of the original. The series, as those of us who have
never forgotten it know, ended with Charles Xavier being assassinated at the UN
by Trask, one of the most virulent leaders of the anti-mutant forces. The
action takes place one year. Xavier's death has done much to bring sympathy for
mutants from the government, including the UN but it has done nothing to end
the bigotry and hatred that anti-mutant forces still feel across the world nor
has it done anything to stem the most violent mutants of the group. The 'Friends
of Humanity' are still in force and still have the will and finances to express
their virulent message. We are never allowed to forget that in this world 'X'
is the first letter in 'xenophobia'.
All of the X-Men who were regulars
in the original series are part of the team, including two recurring faces that
might be unfamiliar to those who only have seen the movies. Morph (who in this
version is clearly more outwardly homosexual then was implied in the original)
and Bishop, the mutant from a distant future who was involved in many major
storylines in the original series. There has been some movement towards family:
Scott and Jean are still married and Jean is on several months pregnant in the
pilot and it looks like Gambit and Rogue have found a kind of happiness. Scott
and Jean are actually considering leaving the team to raise their son when the
show begins and by the end of the series premiere, things are thrown into chaos
when it is revealed that in his last will and testament Xavier left everything to
Magneto.
In the original series Magneto
was radically different then even animated series characters allowed their lead
villain to be: Xavier was always sympathetic to Erik's cause and the two worked
together many times over the show. In 97, Erik's backstory as a survivor
of the Holocaust is stated directly and explains his motivations in a way the original
cartoon wasn't allowed to. (You could imply Nazis on the show but you
couldn't show actual ones in a 1990s cartoon.) Considering how much of
the original series showed the team fighting against Magneto they are as little
inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt as the international justice system
is when they move to arrest him at the start of the second episode. We are as
shocked as everyone else when he agrees to peacefully surrender.
The second episode is the
clearest parallel to modern events as while Magneto is pleading his case,
anti-mutant protestors storm the facility with the implicating of killing both
him – and the court for daring to give him due process. This leads to the first
big shock of the series as while trying to protect him Storm is hit by a blast
from a gun – and loses her mutant powers. Erik is enraged and lifts both the justices
and his would be assassin several miles about the ground. We're not sure if the
series would be willing to go this far in an animated cartoon (this is the 21st
century) but the longtime viewers know enough that this is a realistic
possibility. Instead Magneto delivers a stirring monologue in favor of his old
friend that isn't that far removed from the original series. He is pardoned and
the mutant nation of Genosha is granted status by the UN, something Scott never
thought possible. Still Erik knows that the battle is far from won.
The worst implications come in
the third episode when another Jean shows up at the mansion. We're given to
expect that she's a clone but the reality is far more shocking: this is the
real Jean. (This is an old storyline of the original series.) It comes as little
shock that Mister Sinister, the mutant Nazi scientist of Marvel Comics, is
behind this clone and indeed his intentions are far worse than usual. By now
Jean has given birth to their new son and Sinister has every intention of using
the possibilities. He uses the clone to invoke havoc on the Mansion in images I
know the original series would never try. Eventually Magneto leads a team and
they rescue the son – but the worst has already happened. This leads the
Summers' to make a decision even more painful then they've ever wanted – and something
they may have driven a break between the original love story of the mutants in
a way that not even the Phoenix could.
X-Men '97 is brilliant on an animated level
as well as a story one and while some online 'friends of humanity' might argue
it's more woke, I'd remind them that the X-Men always have been. They
were created as much as a reaction to the civil rights movement in comic book
form and for all the comic book aspect they've always been the most political
of all the comic books either franchise has designed. If you really can't see
the metaphor for racism in a show where the world has a problem with
characters who often have different color skin then most people then you
have a more willful blindness then I associate with most comic book fans.
People have been trying to read the idea of the mutants being a metaphor for
homosexuality when they've always been a metaphor of any level of difference in our society. The
fact that when Jean is in labor the hospital makes it clear it doesn't treat mutants
is leaning into the original metaphor as anything else.
X-Men '97 is yet again another argument why
animation is almost always a better format to tell a comic book story and that
television is the superior way to tell these stories. Over the last five years
we've been blessed with a super group of limited series that have retold comic
book sagas in a way that movies have increasingly been failing at. I speak not
just of last year's The Penguin and Agatha All Along, but also Wandavision,
Watchmen and Loki all of which have received multiple award
nominations from critics groups and many of which have either been nominated
for Emmys or will be. It didn't shock me that the first comic book films of any
kind to win a Best Picture award were the Spider-Verse adaptations of
the last few years. It has always been easier to express the grand scope of
comic books in long form stories than the most elongated cinematic universe and
it is always easier to show the wonder of it in animation then the most
brilliant CGI.
It doesn't shock me that comic
book films are started to decline in both box office and critical acclaim in
recent years though that may turn around this summer, I'm not sure. But series
like X-Men '97 demonstrate that this remains the superior method to tell
the kind of stories that even the best movies just can't. (And to repeat, I've
never really liked on a creative level the majority of the comic book films
even by the standards of other well-made blockbusters.) X-Men '97 is the best example of how to
adapt a franchise perfectly: it's one step backwards but also two steps
forward. And for once, I actually can't wait for a sequel – or the next season.
My score: 4.75 stars.
No comments:
Post a Comment