Monday, July 14, 2025

The Institute Is Another Solid Example As To Why TV Is The Best Medium to Adapt Stephen King

 

 

I've previously written that when it comes to the work of Stephen King, television has always been a superior medium to tell his stories than film. This was definitely true when I came of age in the 1990s thanks to the relation of ABC and filming of what were then called miniseries that adapted some of his most complicated novels from The Stand to Tommyknockers to a more fully realized The Shining. To be sure there were good film adaptations during the decade but the majority were either of those that were told in a limited setting (Misery) or of his short fiction (The Shawshank Redemption).

We went through a dry spell on both fronts in the 2000s as the relationship between King and ABC came to an end and we got a series of mostly inadequate films (Dreamcatcher and Secret Window being the biggest disasters on the film front). Then with the appearance of streaming and the rise of limited series King finally started getting the kind of grand treatment he deserved whether it was 11.22.63 on Hulu, Mr. Mercedes on Direct TV and The Outsider on HBO (with the latter two giving us two different interpretations of Holly Gibney). Filmmakers such as Mike Flanagan are become skilled at handling his work as well and it is conceivable that Constant Readers may finally get the adaptation of The Dark Tower series we've been promised for twenty years.

This past week a superb utility player in the world of pay cable original series MGM+ debuted the two episode premiere of The Institute. I've written very little about MGM+ for my blog but that is not because of a lack of appreciate for its programs. This is the network that has created two superb original series the horror series From which King himself is a huge admirer of and Godfather of Harlem, which shows the brilliant Forest Whitaker as Bumpy Johnson role is underworld boss and civil rights advocate. We've also seen more than our share of superb adaptations of complicated books: A Spy Among Friends with the story of Kim Philby's long history as the most notorious double agent in MI6 history and The Emperor of Ocean Park, the story of how the family of an African-American jurist whose death becomes the subject of upheaval for his children. In many ways this is a better home for the work of Stephen King than HBO where so much of their adaptations bear the weight of prestige projects and therefore often have an unfair burden.

The Institute is a fairly recent King novel (2019) and deals with a teen genius named Luke Ellis (Joe Freeman). He's an ordinary fourteen year old whose biggest dream at the start of the episode is to go to MIT. It's clear he has a slight telekinetic power though it's never clear if his parents know about it. The night he tells them his house is invaded by a wet-ops team and Luke is abducted waking up in The Institute.

Luke is greeted by the staff of the institute, led by Ms. Sigsby (Mary Louise Parker) Sigsby is clearly the face of The Institute and the only person who doesn't appear to be a creep on first sight. Mr. Stackhouse (Julian Richings) is the head of security, Dr. Hendricks is the head of testing and all the rest of the staff basically seem like their sadists in waiting or in practice. Mrs. Sigsby tells Luke that she has been selected for the most important work in the history of humanity, that all he has to undergo is a few minor experiments and after they are done his memory will be erased erased and he will return this normal life. Luke clearly doesn't believe this for a second even before he meets the other kids.

All of them are around his age, with telekinetic powers and are almost blasé by what is going on save for Nicky, the oldest, a veteran of foster homes and who knows there's no such thing as a happy ending. The younger kids are trying to believe there's a way out of this. Luke knows better from the start.

It is a credit to the creators of the show that The Institute looks pretty much the way it was described in King's original novel: there are certain high tech security apparatus but even that's at least a decade out of date, the candy in the vending machine has things that expired in the 1990s and the inspirational posters look like they were created in the 1970s at best. The decision to have Jack Bender be the director of the series is also a good choice. Bender is a hero to genre fans for his work on Lost and for this kind of show you want the man who spent years filming the Dharma Initiative directing. Looking at The Institute you get the feeling this is the kind of place that the DeGroot's might have founded had they gone corporate – and that hasn't gotten a paint job since it was found in the 1970s.

One of the better in-jokes of King's original book was that the project that was designed to supposedly save the world is run like every other government bureaucracy in the country. Sigsby has to complain about budget cuts to her boss (who while unseen I'm pretty sure is played by genre veteran Jeff Fahey) and he tells her very simply that she'll just have to make do with less. The explanation King gave in his books was that in order to maintain security it was impossible to let anyone look at the place and not raise questions and while that's no doubt true, you also get the feel that The Institute has been suffered the same kind of budget cuts as every other program in the so called Safety Net. (I don't think it's a coincidence we see a picture of Reagan on the desk of one of the bosses.) Added to the mix is that the testing equipment looks likes it's been taken off the set of St. Elsewhere and the men involved are trying to freeze out Sigsby because she's the only woman in authority here.

Mary-Louise Parker is perfectly cast as Sigsby; in a sense she's been playing roles like this on television for much of the 2000s. As the iconoclastic Amy Gardener who gave the Bartlet Administration so much grief and the mother in Weeds who went from growing marijuana to help her kids to running an empire you can see that this character is an older version of both. We also see glimpses into her private life which include burning herself with a hot poker and having sex in the closet with the youngest male there – and not talking about it.

The major difference between the novel and the limited series is one of necessity. The parallel story being told was that of Tim Jamieson (Ben Barnes) who impulsively takes an offer for a plane ticket to Georgia with cash, ends up in a small town there and becomes what's known as a night knocker – someone who makes sure all the small towns and business are locked up at night. He has a history in law enforcement, good and bad and he develops a quick report with the townspeople. The major difference is the small town has been moved to Maine where The Institute is located. I suspect that it is a decision of storytelling necessity and I don't object. He clearly has a report with certain people, including Annie the local bag lady who seems to be schizophrenic but in the second episode casually mentions 'The Institute'. Tiim doesn't have to time to hear it before he has to interrupt a robbery and help save an injured shopkeeper but I suspect it will come back.

The Institute series also gives slightly more of an idea as to where the people who worked at the title place lived and in another wonderful in-joke, they seem to live in a private suburb not far from where they work. It's clearly close enough Hendricks and Stackhouse walk to their homes after work – and feal no remorse about being caught talking in front of Sigsby's.

Having read the original book I'm familiar with the basic metrics of the plot but as it was several years ago the details escape me. I have no desire to refresh my memories until after I have seen the entire original series. What I do know is that MGM+ gets most of the details right when it comes to atmosphere and with any King adaptation that's eighty percent of the battle right there. The series is scheduled to be ten episodes all of which are roughly fifty minutes to an hour long and that also seems like more than sufficient time to tell the full story with enough details added in to give in verisimilitude. The performers across the board are superb, particularly the teenagers who've been cast. And it has the perfect mesh of surrealism and the ordinary that makes up so much of King's fiction: the second episode begins with Ms. Sigsby gathering everybody together for a 'birthday party'  - really a way to 'celebrate'' one of the teenagers 'graduating'. The adults are the only ones who are trying to be celebratory, the children are annoyed they have to have sugar for breakfast and the subject herself just wants to wish to go home.

I suspect that many people last night watched the two episode debut of Dexter: Resurrection. I could have to, I suppose, but as someone who was tired of Michael C. Hall's serial killer long before New Blood I wasn't particularly eager to see him wreak havoc in New York, even with Peter Dinklage and Uma Thurman. My summer will be a busy one on Sunday nights: I'm going to spend the early evening enjoying The Gilded Age and the late evening with The Institute. My advice to my followers: save the Dark Passenger for later in the year and Hail to the King. It's more original than whatever happens there – and it just might be a better show.

My score: 3.75 stars.

  

No comments:

Post a Comment